The Effect of Social Structural Change on the Traditional Turkish Houses Becoming Unusable

Authors: Gamze Fahriye Pehlivan, Tulay Canitez

Abstract:

The traditional Turkish houses becoming unusable are a result of the deterioration of the balanced interaction between users and house (human and house) continuing during the history. Especially depending upon the change in social structure, the houses becoming neglected do not meet the desires of the users and do not have the meaning but the shelter are becoming unusable and are being destroyed. A conservation policy should be developed and renovations should be made in order to pass the traditional houses carrying the quality of a cultural and historical document presenting the social structure, the lifestyle and the traditions of its own age to the next generations and to keep them alive.

Keywords: House, social structural change, social structural, traditional Turkish houses.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338190

References:

[1] O. Kucukerman, Turkish House in Search of Spatial Identity, Turkiye Turing ve Otomobil KurumuYayini, Istanbul, 2007, pp.48-49.
[2] M. Es and O. Akin, “Konut Memnuniyeti,” Sosyal Sermaye ve Yerel Siyaset Dergisi, no:25, pp. 73-80, 2008.
[3] S. H. Eldem, Turkish Houses Ottoman Period, Turkiye Anit Cevre Turizm Degerlerini Koruma Vakfi Yayini, Istanbul, vol:1, 1984, pp. 16.
[4] E. F Arcan and F. EVCI, Mimari Tasarima Yaklasim Bina Bilgisi Calismalar, Tasarim Yayin Grubu, Istanbul, 1999, pp. 64-65.
[5] D. Kuban, Sanat Tarihimizin Sorunlari, Cagdas Yayinlari, Istanbul 1976, pp: 192.
[6] D., Atikand N., Erdogan, “Geleneksel Konut Mimarligini Etkileyen Sosyo-Kulturel Faktorler: Edirne’de Sinasi Dortok Evi, ”Trakya Univ. J Sci, 8(1), pp.21-27, 2007.
[7] M. Baran and M. Yildirim, “Geleneksel Turk Evi ve Renk Kullanimi, ”Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 26, pp. 223-234, 2008.
[8] S. Demirarslan, “Turk Insani Icin Yapilan Konutlarda Yasam Kalitesinin Elde Edilebilmesi Icin Gerekli Faktorler,” Konut Degerlendirme Sempozyumu 2004 I.T.U. Mimarlik Fakultesi Yayinlari, Istanbul, 2005, pp.102.
[9] M. Goker, “Turklerde Oturma Elemanlarinin Tarihsel Gelisim Sureci, ”Journal of World of Turks, vol. 1, no.1,pp.163-169,2009.
[10] N. Kucukaslan, “Toplumsal Iliskiler ve Protokol, ”Ekonomi Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, no:1, Bursa, 2007.
[11] V. Unal, “The Problem of Divorce during the Transition from Extended Family to Nuclear Family and Religion,” The Journal of International Social Research, vol. 6, Issue: 26, pp.588-602, spring 2013.
[12] C. Bagavos and C. Martin, “What Happens to the European Family. Family Observer, European Observatory on Family Matters,” European Commission Employment and Social Affairs, no.3, pp.20–28, 2002.
[13] H. Altintas, “Psikoloji Sozlugu Uzerine Kucuk Bir Deneme,”Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi, vol. 29, Ankara, pp.241-242, 1987.
[14] S. Budak, Psikoloji Sozlugu, Bilim ve Sanat Yayincilik, Ankara, 2000, pp. 319.
[15] Y. Gunindil and S. Yasa Giren, “Aile Kavraminin Degisim Sureci Ve Okul Oncesi Donemde Ailenin Onemi, ”Selcuk Universitesi Ahmet Kelesoglu Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, no.31, pp. 349-361,2011.
[16] G. Marshall, Sosyoloji Sozlugu, Bilim ve Sanat Yayinevi, Ankara, 1999, pp. 265.
[17] M. Yazici, “Toplumsal Degisim ve Sosyal Degerler,” Turkish Studies- International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, vol. 8/8, Ankara, pp. 1489-1501, Summer 2013.
[18] R. Aras, K. Yildirim and M. Utar, “Sosyo-Kulturel Degisimin Geleneksel Urfa Evlerinde Mekan Organizasyonuna Etkisi,” G.U. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, no: 16 (4), pp.780,2003.
[19] N. Gultekin, “Geleneksel Konut Dokusunda Kullanim Surecinin Değerlendirilmesi-Beypazari Orneği,” Gazi Universitesi Muh. Mim. Fak. Dergisi, vol: 22, no: 3, pp.261-272, Ankara, 2007.
[20] S. Kaygalak, Kentin Multecileri Neoliberalizm Kosullarinda Zorunlu Goc ve Kentlesme, Dipnot Yayinlari, Ankara, 2009, pp.9.
[21] Y. Kocak ve E. Terzi, “Turkiye’de Goc Olgusu, Goc Edenlerin Kentlere Olan Etkileri Ve Cozum Onerileri,” Kafkas University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Vol: 3, No: 3, pp.163- 184, 2012.