Water Saving in Arid Regions: Comparison of Innovative Techniques for Irrigation of Young Date Palms

Authors: R. Bourziza, A. Hammani, M. Kuper, A. Bouaziz

Abstract:

In oases, the surface water resources are becoming increasingly scarce and groundwater resources, which generally have a poor quality due to the high levels of salinity, are often overexploited. Water saving have therefore become imperative for better oases sustainability. If drip irrigation is currently recommended in Morocco for saving water and valuing, its use in the sub-desert areas does not keep water safe from high evaporation rates. An alternative to this system would be the use of subsurface drip irrigation. This technique is defined as an application of water under the soil surface through drippers, which deliver water at rates generally similar to surface drip irrigation. As subsurface drip irrigation is a recently introduced in Morocco, a better understanding of the infiltration process around a buried source, in local conditions, and its impact on plant growth is necessarily required. This study aims to contribute to improving the water use efficiency by testing the performance of subsurface irrigation system, especially in areas where water is a limited source. The objectives of this research are performance evaluation in arid conditions of the subsurface drip irrigation system for young date palms compared to the surface drip. In this context, an experimental test is installed at a farmer’s field in the area of Erfoud (Errachidia Province, southeastern Morocco), using the subsurface drip irrigation system in comparison with the classic drip system for young date palms. Flow measurement to calculate the uniformity of the application of water was done through two methods: a flow measurement of drippers above the surface and another one underground. The latter method has also helped us to estimate losses through evaporation for both irrigation techniques. In order to compare the effect of two irrigation modes, plants were identified for each type of irrigation to monitor certain agronomic parameters (cumulative numbers of palms and roots development). Experimentation referred to a distribution uniformity of about 88%; considered acceptable for subsurface drip irrigation while it is around 80% for the surface drip irrigation. The results also show an increase in root development and in the number of palm, as well as a substantial water savings due to lower evaporation losses compared to the classic drip irrigation. The results of this study showed that subsurface drip irrigation is an efficient technique, which allows sustainable irrigation in arid areas.

Keywords: Subsurface drip irrigation, Water conservation, Arid areas, Young date palms.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1337661

References:

[1] ASAE Std., 1999. Soil and Water Terminology. S 526.1. ASAE Standards. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph M.I..
[2] A.I. Al-Amoud., M.A. Bacha and A.M. Al-Darby. Seasonal water use of date palms in Central Region of Saudi Arabia. Agricultural Engineering Journal 9(2), 2000 pp: 51-62.
[3] B. Hanson and D. May. The effect of drip line placement on yield and quality of drip irrigated processing tomatoes. Irrig. Drainage Syst N°21. 2007, pp: 109-118.
[4] Safi B., Neyshabouri M.R. and Nazem A.H., 2007. Water Application Uniformity of Subsurface Drip Irrigation System at Various Operating Pressures and tape Lengths. Turk J. of Agric.and Forest. 31(2007): 275- 285.
[5] Singh D.K., Rajput T.B.S, 2007. Response of lateral placement depths of subsurface drip irrigation on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). International Journal of Plant Production, 1, pp 73-84.
[6] Ayers J.E., Phene C.J., Schoneman R.A., Meso B., Dale F. and Penland J., 1995. Impact of bed location on the operation of subsurface drip irrigation systems. In: Proc. 5th int.Microirrigation Congress, ASAE, p.168-174.
[7] Tiwari K.N., MalP.K., Singh R.M.et ChattopadhyayA., 1998. Response of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus”L.” Moench) to drip irrigation under mulch and non-mulch condition. Agric. Water Manage. 38, pp 91-102.
[8] Thompson T.L., Doerge T.A.et GodinR.E., 2002. Subsurface drip irrigation and fertigation of broccoli: agronomic, economic, and environmental outcomes and environmental outcomes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66, pp 178-185.
[9] Thompson T.L., WhiteS.A., Walworth J.L. et SowerG.S., 2003. Fertigation Frequency for Subsurface Drip-Irrigated Broccoli, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67, pp 910-918.
[10] Douh B. and BoujelbenA., 2010 (a), Water saving and eggplant response to subsurface drip irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Segment, 1 (2): 1525, pp 1-12.
[11] Payero J., 2002. Is subsurface drip irrigation right for your operations?. Crop watch new service web page, Univ. of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cooperative Extension.
[12] Patel N., Rajput T.B.S., 2008. Dynamics and modeling of soil water under subsurface drip irrigated onion. Agricultural water management 95, 1335 – 1349.
[13] Ayars J.E., Phene C.J., Hutmacher R.B., Davis K.R., Schoneman R.A., Vail S.S. and Mead R.M., 1999. Subsurface drip irrigation of row crops: a review of 15 years of research at the Water Management Research laboratory. Agric. Water Manage. 42 (1999): 1-27. 1999.
[14] Enciso J., Jifon J.et Wiedenfeld B., 2007, Subsurface drip irrigation of onions: Effects of drip tape emitter spacing on yield and quality. J. Agr. Water Manage, 92, pp 126–130.
[15] A.I. Al-Amoud, “Subsurface Drip Irrigation for Date Palm Trees to Conserve Water”. Acta Hort. 882, ISHS 2010.
[16] Qassim A., 2003. Subsurface irrigation: A situation analysis. Intern. In: Prog. For Technology and Res. In Irrigation and Drainage (IPTRID), Tatura, Australia.
[17] Keller J. and Karmeli D., 1974. Trickle irrigation design parameters. Transactions of the ASAE Vol. 24(4): 678-684.
[18] Singh D.K., 2004. Performance evaluation of subsurface drip irrigation systems. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, P.G. School, IARI, New Delhi, 135 pp.
[19] Meshkat M., Warner R.C., Workman S.R., 2000. Evaporation reduction potential in an undisturbed soil irrigated with surface and sand tube irrigation. Transactions of ASAE 43, 79–86.
[20] Philip J.R., 1991a. Upper bounds on evaporation losses from buried sources. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55, 1516–1520.
[21] Philip J.R., 1991b. Effect of root and sub irrigation on evaporation and percolation losses. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55, 1520– 1523.
[22] Thompson T.L., Pang H, Li Y., 2009. The Potential Contribution of Subsurface Drip Irrigation to Water-Saving Agriculture in the Western USA. Agr. Sci. in China, Vol. 8, Issue 7: 850-854.
[23] Douh B., Boujelben A., 2007. Effet du système d’irrigation goutte à goutte souterrain sur une culture d’aubergine. Séminaire international, Exploitation des ressources en eau pour une agriculture durable. Hammamet-Tunisie 21 et 22 novembre, in Abstract book, p70.
[24] Vermeiren L., Jobling G.A., 1980. Localized irrigation: design - installation - operation – evaluation. FAO irrigation and drainage paper, 36, pp 8.