A Comparison of Single Point Incremental Forming Formability between Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
A Comparison of Single Point Incremental Forming Formability between Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel

Authors: K. Rattanachan

Abstract:

In sheet metal forming process, raw material mechanical properties are important parameters. This paper is to compare the wall’s incline angle or formability of SS 400 steel and SUS 304 stainless steel in single point incremental forming. The two materials are ferrous base alloyed, which have the different unit cell, mechanical property and chemical composition. They were forming into cone shape specimens having 100 mm diameter with different wall’s incline angle: 90o, 75o and 60o. The investigation was continued until the specimens formed surface facture. The experimental result showed that the smaller the wall incline angle higher the formability with the both materials. The formability limit of the ferrous base alloy was approx. 60o wall’s incline angle. By nature, SS 400 has higher formability than SUS 304. This result can be used as the initial data in designing the single point incremental forming parts.

Keywords: NC incremental forming, Single point incremental forming, Wall incline angle, Formability.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1337589

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2639

References:


[1] P. Hausild, Ph. Pilvin and M. Landa: the 17th European Conference on Fracture, 2-5 September 2008, Brno, Czech Republic. p 1312-1319
[2] J. J. Park and Y. H. Kim: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 140 (2003), p 447-453
[3] L. Fratini, G. Ambrogio, R. Di Lorenzo, L. Filice, F. Micari: 2004
[4] G. Ambrogio, L. Filice, F. Micari: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 177 (2006), p 413-416
[5] F. CapeceMinutolo, M. Durante, A. Formisano, A. Langella: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 194 (2007), p 145-150
[6] Information on http www.chem.ufl.edu
[7] L. Filice, L. Fratini, F. Micari: Annals of CIRP Vol. 51/1/2002
[8] S. F. Golovashchenko, A. Krause: Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. Volume 14(4) August 2005, p 503-507
[9] G. Hussain, L. Gao, Z.Y. Zhang, Int J AdvManufTechnol (2007), Springer-Verlag London Limited.
[10] M. Ham and J. Jeswiet: Annals of the CIRP Vol. 56/1/2007
[11] M.B. Silva, M. Skjoedt, P.A.F. Martins, N. Bay: Article in press, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture.
[12] G. Hussain, L. Gao, N.U. Dar: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 186 (2007), p 45-53
[13] G. Hussain, L. Gao: International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol. 47 (2007), p 419-435
[14] G. Hussain, L. Gao, N. Hayat, L. Qijian: International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol. 47 (2007), p 2177-2181
[15] G. Hussain, N.U. Dar, L. Gao, M.H. Chen: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 187-188 (2007), p 94-98