Unsteady 3D Post-Stall Aerodynamics Accounting for Effective Loss in Camber Due to Flow Separation
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
Unsteady 3D Post-Stall Aerodynamics Accounting for Effective Loss in Camber Due to Flow Separation

Authors: Aritras Roy, Rinku Mukherjee

Abstract:

The current study couples a quasi-steady Vortex Lattice Method and a camber correcting technique, ‘Decambering’ for unsteady post-stall flow prediction. The wake is force-free and discrete such that the wake lattices move with the free-stream once shed from the wing. It is observed that the time-averaged unsteady coefficient of lift sees a relative drop at post-stall angles of attack in comparison to its steady counterpart for some angles of attack. Multiple solutions occur at post-stall and three different algorithms to choose solutions in these regimes show both unsteadiness and non-convergence of the iterations. The distribution of coefficient of lift on the wing span also shows sawtooth. Distribution of vorticity changes both along span and in the direction of the free-stream as the wake develops over time with distinct roll-up, which increases with time.

Keywords: Post-stall, unsteady, wing, aerodynamics.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1317078

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 935

References:


[1] C. L. Rumsey, J. P. Slotnick, M. Long, R. A. Stuever, and T.R. Wayman. Summary of the first aiaa cfd high-lift prediction workshop. Journal of Aircraft, 48(6):2068–2079, 2011.
[2] I Tani. A simple method of calculating the induced velocity of a monoplane wing. Aero. Res. Inst., Tokyo Imperial Univ., 9(3), 1934.
[3] R. S. Schairer. Unsymmetrical lift distributions on a stalled monoplane wing. Master’s thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1939.
[4] Stanley T. Piszkin and E. S. Levinsky. Nonlinear lifting line theory for predicting stalling instabilities on wings of moderate aspect ratio. Technical report, DTIC Document, 1976.
[5] John D. Anderson and Stephen Corda. Numerical lifting line theory applied to drooped leading-edge wings below and above stall. Journal of Aircraft, 17(12):898–904, 1980.
[6] Barnes W McCormick. An iterative non-linear lifting line model for wings with unsymmetrical stall. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper, 1989.
[7] Jing-Biau Tseng and C. Edward Lan. Calculation of aerodynamic characteristics of airplane configurations at high angles of attack. Technical Report NASA-CR-4182, Kansas Univ. Center for Research, Inc.; Flight Research Lab., 1988.
[8] C. P. Van Dam, J. C. Vander Kam, and J. K. Paris. Design-oriented high-lift methodology for general aviation and civil transport aircraft. Journal of aircraft, 38(6):1076–1084, 2001.
[9] Rinku Mukherjee and Ashok Gopalarathnam. Poststall prediction of multiple-lifting-surface configurations using a decambering approach. Journal of Aircraft, 43(3):660–668, 2006.
[10] Robert T. Jones. The unsteady lift of a wing of finite aspect ratio. Technical Report NACA-TN-682, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics., 1940.
[11] J. Katz and A. Plotkin. Low-Speed Aerodynamics. Cambridge Aerospace Series. Cambridge University Press, 2001.