Search results for: P. Stiles

Authors: I. Coxhill, P. Stiles, R. Westcott

Abstract:

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the LEROS 4 high-thrust apogee engine, intended for use on interplanetary spacecraft. The LEROS 4 rocket engine is a nominal 1.05 kN thrust engine, burning MMH and MON-3 with an Isp of >317s. The engine can be considered an enhanced thrust version of the conventional ~400N apogee engines used on many telecommunication platforms. The motivation for the development of this engine was the need for high-performance, high-thrust propulsion, particularly where gravity losses are high - typical of interplanetary maneuvers. There are a limited number of commercially available engines in the ~1kN class with a high specific impulse. The LEROS 4 engine aimed to fill this gap and provide a flexible engine for high-thrust applications. Two variants of the engine were developed out of the main programme: the LEROS 4 and the LEROS 4-ET. Whilst the LEROS 4 has a nominal thrust of 1.05kN, the ET (Extended Thrust) version operates at a nominal 1.31 kN, albeit at higher inlet pressure. This paper charts the design and development of the engine through the initial concepts, hot fire testing at sea level, hot fire testing at altitude, all the way through to engine qualification for ESA (European Space Agency). In addition to the engine itself, the test facilities in which the engine is tested are discussed. As the LEROS 4 has an unusual thrust level, there are few facilities in the world that can efficiently test an engine at this thrust level. Accordingly, Nammo designed and built a vacuum test facility that allows testing up to 1.5kN of thrust to accommodate the LEROS 4 program. Some unique features of this test facility are explained in the paper. The paper also discusses the in-flight experience of the inaugural flight (the LEROS 4-ET on board the Firefly Blue Ghost lunar lander) and the ongoing LEROS-4 qualification program for ESA, targeted at the EnVision mission to Venus. Finally, the paper summarises the achievements to date and presents a detailed specification of the performance capability.

Keywords: apogee, hypergolic, interplanetary, MMH, MON-3, rocket engine, spacecraft

Procedia PDF Downloads 2

Authors: Lindie Grebe

Abstract:

This paper reports on a study that explored the strategizing practices of professional accountants in the mining industry, based on Jarratt and Stiles’ dominant strategizing practice models framework. Drawing on a strategy-as-practice perspective, the paper recognises qualified professional accountants in strategic management such as Chief Executive Officers, as strategy practitioners that perform their strategizing practices and praxis within a specific context. The main findings of this paper were produced through semi-structured individual interviews with accountants that perform strategy on a business level in the South African mining industry. Qualitative data were analysed through conversation analysis over two coding-cycles. Findings describe accountant strategists as practitioners who challenge the dominant business model when a disconnect seems to exist between international corporate level strategy and business level strategy in the South African mining industry. Accountant strategy practitioners described their dominant strategizing practice model as incremental change during strategic planning and as a lived experience during strategy implementation. Findings portrayed these strategists as taking initiative as strategy leaders in a dynamic and volatile environment to combine their accounting background with strategic management and challenge the dominant business model. Understanding how accountant strategists perform strategizing offers insight into the social practice of strategic management. This understanding contributes to the body of knowledge on strategizing in the South African mining industry. In addition, knowledge on the transformation of accountants as strategists could provide valuable practice relevant insights for accounting educators and the accounting profession alike.

Keywords: accountant strategists, dominant strategizing practice models framework, mining industry, strategy-as-practice

Procedia PDF Downloads 179

Authors: A.D. Fredline, Beverly Stiles

Abstract:

This is a qualitative investigation that examines the social media site, Tumblr, for the goal of analyzing the controversy regarding the inclusion of asexuality in the LGBTQ+ community. As platforms such as Tumblr permit the development of communities for marginalized groups, social media serves as a core component to exclusionary practices and boundary negotiations for community membership. This research is important because there is a paucity of research on the topic and a significant gap in the literature with regards to intracommunity gatekeeping. However, discourse on the topic is blatantly apparent on social media platforms. The objectives are to begin to bridge the gap in the literature by examining attitudes towards the inclusion of asexuality within the LGBTQ+ community. In order to analyze the attitudes developed towards the inclusion of asexuality in the LGBTQ+ community, eight publicly available blogs on Tumblr.com were selected from both the “inclusionist” and “exclusionist” perspectives. Blogs selected were found through a basic search for “inclusionist” and “exclusionist” on the Tumblr website. Out of the first twenty blogs listed for each set of results, those centrally focused on asexuality discourse were selected. For each blog, the fifty most recent postings were collected. Analysis of the collected postings exposed three central themes from the exclusionist perspective as well as for the inclusionist perspective. Findings indicate that from the inclusionist perspective, asexuality belongs to the LGBTQ+ community. One primary argument from this perspective is that asexual individuals face opposition for their identity just as do other identities included in the community. This opposition is said to take a variety of forms, such as verbal shaming, assumption of illness and corrective rape. Another argument is that the LGBTQ+ community and asexuals face a common opponent in cisheterosexism as asexuals struggle with the assumed and expected sexualization. A final central theme is that denying asexual inclusion leads to the assumption of heteronormativity. Findings also indicate that from the exclusionist perspective, asexuality does not belong to the LGBTQ+ community. One central theme from this perspective is the equivalization of cisgender heteroromantic asexuals with cisgender heterosexuals. As straight individuals are not allowed in the community, exclusionists argue that asexuals engaged in opposite gender partnerships should not be included. Another debate is that including asexuality in the community sexualizes all other identities by assuming sexual orientation is inherently sexual rather than romantic. Finally, exclusionists also argue that asexuality encourages childhood labeling and forces sexual identities on children, something not promoted by the LGBTQ+ community. Conclusions drawn from analyzing both perspectives is that integration may be a possibility, but complexities add another layer of discourse. For example, both inclusionists and exclusionists agree that privileged identities do not belong to the LGBTQ+ community. The focus of discourse is whether or not asexuals are privileged. Clearly, both sides of the debate have the same vision of what binds the community together. The question that remains is who belongs to that community.

Keywords: asexuality, exclusionists, inclusionists, Tumblr

Procedia PDF Downloads 190