The Potential Benefits of Multimedia Information Representation in Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking and History Reasoning

Authors: Ang Ling Weay, Mona Masood

Abstract:

This paper discusses the potential benefits of an interactive multimedia information representation in enhancing students’ critical thinking aligned with history reasoning in learning history amongst Secondary School students in Malaysia. Two modes of multimedia information representation were implemented; chronologic and thematic information representations. A qualitative study of an unstructured interview was conducted among two history teachers, one history education lecturer, two i-think experts, and five students from Form Four secondary school. The interview was to elicit their opinions on the implementation of thinking maps and interactive multimedia information representation in history learning. The key elements of the interactive multimedia (e.g. multiple media, user control, interactivity and use of timelines and concept maps) were then considered to improve the learning process. Findings of the preliminary investigation reveal that the interactive multimedia information representations have the potential benefits to be implemented as an instructional resource in enhancing students’ higher order thinking skills (HOTs). This paper concludes by giving suggestions for future work.

Keywords: Multimedia Information Representation, Critical Thinking, History Reasoning, Chronological and Thematic Information Representation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1097371

References:

[1] Sofos, M. “Critical Thinking - a Historical Overview. Develepment of Critical Thinking for Successful Future Career in EU: Practical Approach”. Retrieved 21 August 2014, from http://www.sdcentras.lt/ mind/CThistorical.pdf, 2004.
[2] Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D, “An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes”. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183–218, 2003.
[3] Masariah Bt Mispari, “Konsep Pentakrihan Dalam Sejarah”. Persidangan Kebangsaan MGCM 2007. Malaysia, pp. 139-149, 2007.
[4] Jabar, Baharuddin, “Pelaksanaan Kemahiran Pemikiran Sejarah dalam Pengajaran Guru-guru Sejarah: Satu Kajian Kes di Daerah Hilir Perak. In: Menanggapi keberkesanan dan perubahan.” Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, pp. 1-24, 2006.
[5] Terrie, E, “Preparing History Teachers to Develop Young People's Historical Thinking”. Retrieved, April 22, 2014, from http://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-onhistory/ may-2012/possibilities-of-pedagogy/preparing-history-teachersto- develop-young-peoples-historical-thinking, 2012.
[6] Van Drie, J, C van Boxtel, J Jaspers, & G Kanselaar, “Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL”. Computers in Human Behavior, 2005.
[7] Van Drie, J, C van Boxtel, J Jaspers, & Van der L. “Stimulating deep processing in a collaborative learning”. Social interaction in learning and instruction: the meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge environment, 2000.
[8] De Westelinck, K., & Valcke, M. “The impact of external graphical representations in different knowledge domains: Is there a specific effect?” In L. Verschaffel, E. DeCorte, G. Kanselaar & M. Valcke (Eds.), Powerful environments for promoting deep conceptual and strategic learning. Studia Paedagogical (pp. 213-232). Leuven: University Press, 2005.
[9] Barton, K.C, “Making Connections.” In Researching History Education: Theory, Method and Context, 148-56. New York: Routledge, 2008.
[10] Deborah, S, J. "Time" Activities from the Mundane to the Sophisticated”. Retrieved 12, August, 2014 from http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/ows/seminars/tcentury/TimeActivitie s.pdf, 2011.
[11] Prangsma, M. A, “Multimodal representations in collaborative history learning”. Dissertation Utrecht University. Retrieved, April 22, 2014, from http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2007-0620 201655/UUindex.html, 2007.
[12] Barton, K. C. “'Oh, that's a tricky piece!': Children, mediated action, and the tools of historical time”. Elementary School Journal, 103, 161-185, 2002.
[13] Barton, K. C. “Narrative Simplifications in Elementary Children’s Historical Understanding.” In Teaching and Learning History. Advances in Research on Teaching 6, edited by J. Brophy, 51-83. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1996.
[14] Van Boxtel, C., & Van Drie, J. (2004). “Historical reasoning: A comparison of how experts and novices contextualise historical sources”. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 4(2), 89–97. Retrieved from http://www.ex.ac.uk/historyresource/journalstart.htm.
[15] Brian, S. & Leah,H, “Aiding Students Understanding Of History Through A Thematic Approach”. Retrieved 29, April, 2014, from http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2630&conte xt=jwprc, 2010
[16] Fogarty, R, “Problem Based Learning and Other Curriculum Models for the Multiple Intelligences Classroom Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education”, 1997.
[17] Jensen, E, “Brain-based learning: The new science of teaching and training”. San Diego, CA: The Brain Store, 2000
[18] Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. “Teaching and the human brain. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development”, 1991.
[19] Davies. M, & Rajni, S , “A Programmatic Approach to Teaming and Thematic Instruction”. Retrieved, April 22, 2014, from http://www.napomle.org/May2010symposium/A%20Programmatic%20 Approach%20to%20Teaming%20and%20Interdisciplinary%20Instructi on.pdf, 2010.