Effects of Cultivars, Growing and Storage Environments on Quality of Tomato
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Effects of Cultivars, Growing and Storage Environments on Quality of Tomato

Authors: E. Thipe, T. Workneh, A. Odindo, M. Laing

Abstract:

The postharvest quality management of tomatoes is important to limit the amount of losses that occur due to deterioration between harvest and consumption. This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of pre- and postharvest integrated agrotechnologies, involving greenhouse microclimate and postharvest storage conditions, on the postharvest quality attributes of four tomato cultivars. Tomato fruit firmness, colour (hue angle (h°) and L* value), pH and total soluble solids for the cultivars Bona, Star 9037, Star 9009 and Zeal, grown in a fan-pad evaporativelycooled and an open-ended naturally-ventilated tunnel, were harvested at the mature-green stage. The tomatoes were stored for 28 days under cold storage conditions, with a temperature of 13°C and RH of 85%, and under ambient air conditions, with a temperature of 23± 2°C and RH of 52± 4%. This study has provided information on the effect of integrated pre-harvest and postharvest agro-technologies, involving greenhouse microclimate and postharvest storage environment on the postharvest quality attributes of four of the tomato cultivars in South Africa. NVT-grown tomatoes retained better textural qualities, but ripened faster by changing from green to red faster, although these were reduced under cold storage conditions. FPVT-grown tomatoes had lower firmness, but ripened slowly with higher colour attributes. With cold storage conditions, the firmness of FPVT-grown tomatoes was maintained. Cultivar Bona firmness and colour qualities depreciated the fastest, but it had higher TSS content and lower pH values. Star 9009 and Star 9037 presented better quality, by retaining higher firmness and ripening slowly, but they had the lowest TSS contents and high pH values, especially Star 9037. Cold storage improved the firmness of tomato cultivars with poor textural quality and faster colour changes.

Keywords: Greenhouse, micro-climate, tomato, postharvest quality, storage.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1097217

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2618

References:


[1] DAFF, Production guidelines for tomato. Directorate on Agricultural Information Services, Pretoria, South Africa. Available from: www.daff.gov.za/publications. (Accessed 25 March 2013).
[2] H. Hanna, Influence of cultivar, growing media, and cluster pruning on greenhouse tomato yield and fruit quality. HortTechnology, 2009, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 395-399.
[3] M.M. Maboko, C.P. du Plooy, and I. Bertling, Performance of tomato cultivars in temperature and non-temperature controlled plastic tunnels. In: eds. Castilla, N, van Kooten, O, Sase, S, Meneses, JF, Schnitzler, WH and van Os, E, Proceedings of the XXVIIIth International Symposium on Greenhouse and Soilless Cultivation. ActaHort 927, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010, pp. 405-411.
[4] R.G.Snyder, Greenhouse Tomato Handbook. (Internet). Publication 1828, Mississippi State University Extension Service, Starkville, USA. Available from: http://www.msucares.com/pubs/publications/ pub1828.htm. (Accessed 15 August 2003).
[5] C.E. Sams, Pre-harvest factors affecting postharvest texture. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 1999, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 249-254.
[6] P. Sirisomboon, M. Tanaka and T. Kojima, Evaluation of tomato textural mechanical properties. Journal of Food Engineering, 2012, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 618-624.
[7] Gorini, FL and Testoni, A. 1990. The relation between colour and quality of vegetables. In: eds. Jordan, JL, Workshop on Measuring Consumer Perception of Internal Product Quality, 31-60. Acta Hort 259, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
[8] Genanew, T. 2013. Effect of post-harvest treatments on storage behaviour and quality of tomato fruits. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 29-37.
[9] L.A.F. Camelo, and P.A. Gómez, Comparison of colour indexes for tomato ripening. Horticultura Brasileira 2004, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 534- 553.
[10] J.R. Stommel, and K.G. Haynes, Inheritance of beta carotene content in the wild tomato species Lycopersicon cheesmanii. Journal of Heredity 1994, vol. 85, no. 5, 401-404.
[11] R.L. Jarret, H. Sayama, and E.C. Tigchelaar, Pleiotropic effects associated with the chlorophyll intensifier mutations high pigment and dark green in tomato. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1984, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 873-878.
[12] E.J. Sacks and D.M. Francis, Genetic and environmental variation for tomato flesh colour in a population of modern breeding lines. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 20011, vol. 26, no. 2, 221-226
[13] S. Brandt, Z. Pék, and E. Barna, Lycopene content and colour of ripening tomatoes as affected by environmental conditions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2006, vol. 86, no. 4, 568-572.
[14] A. Radzeviius, R. Karklelien, P. Viškelis, R. Bobinait and S. Sakalauskien, Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit quality and physiological parameters at different ripening stages of Lithuanian cultivars. Agronomy Res., 2009, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 712-718.
[15] F.R.B. Caliman, F.J.H. Da Silva, , P.C. Stringheat, P.C.R. Fontes, G.R. Moreira and E.C. Mantovani, Quality of tomatoes grown under a protected environment and field conditions. IDESIA (Chile), 2010, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 75-82.
[16] R. Sakiyama and M.A. Stevens, Organic acid accumulation in attached and detached tomato fruits. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1976, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 394-396.
[17] Bertin, N, Ghichard, N, Leonardi, C, Longuenesse, JJ, Langlois, D and Naves, B. 2000. Seasonal evolution of the quality of fresh glasshouse tomato under Mediterranean conditions, as affected by vapour pressure deficit and plant fruit load. Annals of Botany vol. 85, no. 6,741-750.
[18] ME Saltveit, 2003. Respiratory metabolism. In: eds. Gross, KC, Wang, CY and Saltveit, ME, the Commercial Storage of Fruits, Vegetables and Florist and Nursery Stocks. Agriculture Handbook 66. USDA, Beltsville, USA.
[19] J.W. De Bruyn, F. Garretsen, and E. Kooistra, Variation in taste and chemical composition of the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Euphytica, 1971, vol. 20, no 2, pp. 214-227.
[20] A.A. Kader, Perspective, Flavour quality of fruits and vegetables. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2008, vol. 88, no. 11,1863-1868.
[21] A.A. Kader, Effects of post-harvest handling procedures on tomato quality. In: eds. El-Beltagy, AS and Persson, AR, Symposium on Tomato Production on Arid Land. Acta Hort, 1984, vol. 190, pp. 209- 221.