Preferred Character Size for Oblique Angles

Authors: Photjanat Phimnom, Haruetai Lohasiriwat

Abstract:

In today’s world, the LED display has been used for presenting visual information under various circumstances. Such information is an important intermediary in the human information processing. Researchers have been investigated diverse factors that influence this process effectiveness. The letter size is undoubtedly one major factor that has been tested and recommended by many standards and guidelines. However, viewing information on the display from direct perpendicular position is a typical assumption whereas many actual events are required viewing from the angles. This current research aims to study the effect of oblique viewing angle and viewing distance on ability to recognize alphabet, number, and English word. The total of ten participants was volunteered to our 3 x 4 x 4 within subject study. Independent variables include three distance levels (2, 6, and 12 m), four oblique angles (0, 45, 60, 75 degree), and four target types (alphabet, number, short word, and long word). Following the method of constant stimuli our study suggests that the larger oblique angle, ranging from 0 to 75 degree from the line of sight, results in significant higher legibility threshold or larger font size required (p-value < 0.05). Viewing distance factor also shows to have significant effect on the threshold (p-value < 0.05). However, the effect from distance factor is expected to be confounded by the quality of the screen used in our experiment. Lastly, our results show that single alphabet as well as single number are recognized at significant lower threshold (smaller font size) as compared to both short and long words (p-value < 0.05). Therefore, it is recommended that when designs information to be presented on LED display, understanding of all possible ranges of oblique angle should be taken into account in order to specify the preferred letter size. Additionally, the recommendation of letter size for 100% legibility in our tested conditions is provided in the paper.

Keywords: Letter Size, Oblique Angle, Viewing Distance, Legibility Threshold.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1097211

References:

[1] G. C. Jorna, and H. L. Snyder, “Image Quality Determines Differences in Reading Performance and Perceived Image Quality with CRT and Hard-Copy Displays,” Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 459-469, Aug. 1991.
[2] A. Dillon, “Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature,” Ergonomics, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1297-1326, 1992.
[3] L. K. Henning, and N. Ye, “Interaction of sceen distances, sceen letter height and soure document distance,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 8, pp. 311–322, 1996.
[4] H. Krueger, “Ophthalmological aspects of work with display workstations” in E. Grandjean and E. Vigliani (eds) Ergonomic Aspects of Visual Display Terminal, Taylor and Francil, pp. 31–40, 1980.
[5] H. Schmidtke, “Ergonomic design principles of alphanumeric displays,” in E. Grandjean and E. Vigliani (eds) Ergonomic Aspects of Visual Display Terminal, Taylor and Francil, pp. 265–270, 1980.
[6] M. G. Helander, and B.A. Rupp, “An overview of standards and guidelines for visual display terminals,” Applied Ergonomic, vol. 15, pp. 185-195, 1784.
[7] American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Human Factor Society (HFS) Joint Standard ANSI/HFS 100-1988, “American National Standard for Human Factor Engineering of Visual Display Terminal Workstations,” in L.K. Henning, and N. Ye, Interacting with Computers, pp. 311–322, 1996.
[8] Mil-Std 1472, “VUD letter height stadrad” in L.K. Henning, and N. Ye, Interacting with Computers, pp. 311–322, 1996.
[9] United States Department of Transportation, “Human Factors Design Guidelines for Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS) and Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO)”, 1998. Available from: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch03b.cfm.
[10] ISO Standard, “Font size,” The ergonomic working conditions: working with computers, pp. 12, 2013.
[11] M.S. Sanders, and E.J. McCormick, Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 7nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1992, pp. 102-113.
[12] H. L. Snyder, J. J. Decker, C. J. C. Lloyd, and C Dye, “Effect of Image Polarity on VDT Task Performance,” Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 34, no. 19, pp. 1447-1451, Oct. 1990.
[13] I.H. Shena, K. K. Shiehb, C. Y. Chaoc, and D. S. Leed, “Lighting, font style, and polarity on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays,” in Displays, vol. 30, Apr. 2009, pp. 53–58.
[14] A. H. Wanga , and M. T. Chenb, “Effects of polarity and luminance contrast on visual performance and VDT display quality,” in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 25, May 2000, pp. 415–421.
[15] C. C. Lin, “Effects of contrast ratio and text color on visual performance with TFT-LCD,” in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol 31, Feb. 2003, pp. 65–72.
[16] G. E. Legge, D. H. Parish, A. Luebker, and L. H. Wurm, “Psychophysics of reading. XI. Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast,” in Optical Society of America, vol. 7, 1990, pp. 2002-2010.
[17] JInternational Sign Association. Conspicuity and Readability, 2007. Available from: http://www.signs.org/portals/0/docs/signline/signline_51.pdf.
[18] American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Human Factor Society (HFS) Joint Standard ANSI/HFS 100-1988, “American National Standard for Human Factor Engineering of Visual Display Terminal Workstations,” in S.J. Morrissey, “Readability of VDU Messages with Oblique Screen Angles,” Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety I, pp. 337-343, 1998.
[19] M. B. Weinger, M. E. Wiklund, and D. J. G. Bonneau, Handbook of Human Factors in Medical Device Design, Ed. Boca Raton: CPS Press, 2011, pp.342.
[20] Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage (CIE) 2001/ ISO 2002 Joint CIE/ISO standard S008/E:2001/ISO 8995-1:2002(E): Lighting of Work Places - Part 1: Indoor. Available from: http://www.tieathai.org/know/ general/general0.htm.
[21] Illuminating Engineering Association of Thailand, The basic knowledge of illumination,” 2005. Available from: http://www.tieathai.org/know/ general/general0.htm.
[22] A. Colenbrander, Measuring Vision and Vision Loss, 2001. Available from: http://www.ski.org/Colenbrander/Images/Measuring_Vis_Duane01.pdf
[23] The Announcement Ministry of Education in Royal Thai Government Gazette, Guidelines for optimizing the utilization building in institution, 130 Special Section 43, 2013, pp.15-21.
[in Thai].
[24] T. Teoratanakul, Dictionary for Primary Education in Thailand, Bangkok: P.S. Pattana, 2013, pp. 9-306.
[25] C. Karagoslo, C. Kampangtong and P. Phuriprinya, Entrance Vocabulary Synonyms and Antonyms, Bangkok: P.S.P, 2001, pp. 5-141.
[26] M. Tangpijaikul, Vocabulary for Admission, Bangkok: The book, 2012, pp. 31-151.
[27] Kaiser, Peter K. "Calculation of Visual Angle", in The Joy of Visual Perception: A Web Book, York University. Available from http://www.yorku.ca/eye/visangle.htm.
[28] G. Beattie and A. Ellis, “Learning to read”, in The Psychology of Language And Communication, East Sussex: Prychology Press, 2010, pp. 307-311.