Students’ Level of Participation, Critical Thinking, Types of Action and Influencing Factors in Online Forum Environment

Authors: N. I. Bazid, I. N. Umar

Abstract:

Due to the advancement of Internet technology, online learning is widely used in higher education institutions. Online learning offers several means of communication, including online forum. Through online forum, students and instructors are able to discuss and share their knowledge and expertise without having a need to attend the face-to-face, ordinary classroom session. The purposes of this study are to analyze the students’ levels of participation and critical thinking, types of action and factors influencing their participation in online forum. A total of 41 postgraduate students undertaking a course in educational technology from a public university in Malaysia were involved in this study. In this course, the students participated in a weekly online forum as part of the course requirement. Based on the log data file extracted from the online forum, the students’ type of actions (view, add, update, delete posts) and their levels of participation (passive, moderate or active) were identified. In addition, the messages posted in the forum were analyzed to gauge their level of critical thinking. Meanwhile, the factors that might influence their online forum participation were measured using a 24-items questionnaire. Based on the log data, a total of 105 posts were sent by the participants. In addition, the findings show that (i) majority of the students are moderate participants, with an average of two to three posts per person, (ii) viewing posts are the most frequent type of action (85.1%), and followed by adding post (9.7%). Furthermore, based on the posts they made, the most frequent type of critical thinking observed was justification (50 input or 19.0%), followed by linking ideas and interpretation (47 input or 18%), and novelty (38 input or 14.4%). The findings indicate that online forum allows for social interaction and can be used to measure the students’ critical thinking skills. In order to achieve this, monitoring students’ activities in the online forum is recommended.

Keywords: Critical thinking, learning management system, level of online participation, online forum.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1097080

References:

[1] K.F. Hew and W.S. Cheung. “Higher-level knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions: An analysis of group size, duration of online discussion, and student facilitation techniques”. Instructional Science, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 303–319. 2010.
[2] C.M. Cheong, and W.S. Cheung. “Online discussion and critical thinking skills: A case study in a Singapore secondary school”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 24, no. 5, 19, 2008.
[3] C.S.L Ng, W.S. Cheung, and K.F. Hew. “Interaction in asynchronous discussion forums: peer facilitation techniques”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 28, no. 3, 280-294. 2012
[4] S.S. Cheng, E.Z.F. Liu, and R.S. Shieh. “Identifying the indicators attracting users to online question and answer discussion forums”. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, vol. 40, no.2, 283- 292. 2012
[5] A. Bandura. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, 1986.
[6] E. Hustad, and A.B.A. Arntzen, “Facilitating teaching and learning capabilities in social learning management systems: Challenges, issues, and implications for design”. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, vol. 17, no.1, 19, 2013.
[7] S. Bach, P. Haynes, and L.J. Smith, Online Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Open University Press, 2007.
[8] E. Yukselturk, “An investigation of factors affecting student participation level in an online discussion forum”. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, 9, 2010.
[9] T. Adeyinka, and I. Abdulmumin, Pattern of Undergraduates' Participation in the Online Discussion Forum at the University of Ilorin, Nigeria. Journal of Information Technology Management, 22(3), 18, 2011.
[10] A.G. Picciano, “Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course”. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, vol. 6, no. 1, 2140, 2002.
[11] B. Arend, “Encouraging critical thinking in online threaded discussions”. The Journal of Educators Online, vol. 6, no. 1, 23, 2009.
[12] D.R. Newman, B. Webb, and C. Cochrane, “A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning”. Retrieved fromhttp://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/ methods/contpap.html, 1996.
[13] M. Landis, D.K. Swain, and J.M. Friehe, “Evaluating critical thinking in class and online-comparison of the Newman method and the Facione Rubric”. Communication Disorders Quarterly, vol. 23, no.3, 2007.
[14] I.N. Umar, and N.H. Ahmad, “Trainee teachers’ critical thinking in an online discussion forum: A content analysis”. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, vol. 7, 17, 2010.
[15] B. Allan, and D. Lewis, Virtual Learning Communities: A Guide for Practitioners: Open University Press, 2005
[16] J. Coldwell, A. Craig, J. Mustard, and T. Paterson, “Online students: relationships between participation, demographics and academic performance. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, vol.6, no. 1, 10, 2008.
[17] S.Vonderwell, and S. Zachariah, “Factors that influence participation in online learning”, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 38, no. 2, 213-230, 2005.
[18] C. Vrasidas, and M. McIsaac, “Factors influencing interaction in an online course”, The American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 13, no.3, 22–36. 1999.
[19] S. Ho, “Evaluating students' participation in online discussions”. Retrieved from: http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw02/papers/refereed/ ho/paper.html, 2002.
[20] J.R. Landis and G.G. Koch, “The measurement of observer engagement for categorical data”, Biometrics, vol. 33, np. 20, 1977.
[21] L. Bye, S. Smith, and H.M. Rallis, “Reflection using an online discussion forum: Impact on student learning and satisfaction. Social Work Education, vol. 28, no.8, 841-855, 2009.