Effects of Gamification on Lower Secondary School Students’ Motivation and Engagement

Authors: Goh Yung Hong, Mona Masood

Abstract:

This paper explores the effects of gamification on lower secondary school students’ motivation and engagement in the classroom. Two-group posttest-only experimental design were employed to study the influence of gamification teaching method (GTM) when compared with conventional teaching method (CTM) on 60 lower secondary school students. The Student Engagement Instrument (SEI) and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) were used to assess students’ intrinsic motivation and engagement level towards the respective teaching method. Finding indicates that students who completed the GTM lesson were significantly higher in intrinsic motivation to learn than those from the CTM. Although the result were insignificant and only marginal difference in the engagement mean, GTM still show better potential in raising student’s engagement in class when compared with CTM. This finding proves that the GTM is likely to solve the current issue of low motivation to learn and low engagement in class among lower secondary school students in Malaysia. On the other hand, despite being not significant, higher mean indicates that CTM positively contribute to higher peer support for learning and better teacher and student relationship when compared with GTM. As a conclusion, gamification approach is flexible and can be adapted into many learning content to enhance the intrinsic motivation to learn and to some extent, encourage better student engagement in class.

Keywords: Conventional teaching method, Gamification teaching method, Motivation, Engagement.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096962

References:

[1] S. Saleh, and A. Aziz, “Teaching practices among secondary school teachers in Malaysia.” International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, vol. 47, pp. 63-67, 2012.
[2] Lee Ai Rene, “Minat sikap belajar dan masalah pengajaran dan pembelajaran di kalangan pelajar 4 SPA.” (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia, 2004.
[3] S. Maruli, and R. Wayan, “Identifikasi miskonsepsi guru Kimia pada pembelajaran konsep struktur atom.” Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, Lembaga Penelitian Undiksha, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 148-160, 2007.
[4] N. Chan, “Another Malaysian education dilemma: Can we trust our exams?” Retrieved May 10, 2014: http://www. theedgemalaysia.com/ commentary/270283-opinion-another-malaysian-education-dilemmacan- we-trust-our-exams.html, 2014.
[5] J. J. Lee, and J. Hammer, “Gamification in education: What, how, why bother?” Academic Exchange Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 2. Retrieved 5th May, 2014 from http://www.gamifyingeducation.org/files/Lee-Hammer- AEQ-2011.pdf, 2011.
[6] K. Erenli, “The Impact of Gamification - Recommending Education Scenarios.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 8. pp. 15-21, 2013.
[7] S. Blumenfeld, “The importance of rote learning.” Practical Homeschooling, vol. 34. Retrieved July 20, 2014 from http://www. home-school.com/Articles/the-importance-of-rote-learning.php, 2000.
[8] D. Ong, Y. Y. Chan, W. H. Cho, and T. Y. Koh, “Motivation of learning: An assessment of the practicality and effectiveness of gamification within a tertiary education system in Malaysia.” Paper presented at World Academy of Researchers, Educators, and Scholars in Business, Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Conference, 22 - 25 July 2013, Cape Town, South Africa.
[9] J. Hamari, “Transforming Homo Economicus into Homo Ludens: A Field Experiment on Gamification in a Utilitarian Peer-To-Peer Trading Service.” Electronic Commerce Resaerch and Application, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 236-245, 2013.
[10] S. Deterding, R. Khaled, L. E. Nacke, and D. Dixon, “Gamification: Toward a definition or Corcoran.” The Gamification of Education. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from http://hci.usask.ca/uploads/219- 02-Deterding,-Khaled,-Nacke,-Dixon.pdf, 2011.
[11] S. Smith-Robbins, “’This game sucks’: How to improve the gamification of education.” EDUCAUSE Review Online. Retrieved May 14, 2014, from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/game-sucks-how-improvegamification- education, 2011.
[12] Bunchball, Inc. “Gamification101: An introduction to the use of game dynamics to influence behavior.” Retrieved 10 May, 2014 from http://www.bunchball.com/sites/default/files/downloads/gamification10 1.pdf, 2010.
[13] J. Leming, L. Ellington, and K. Porter-Magee, “Where Did Social Studies Go Wrong?” A report from Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Retrieved May 8, 2014, from http://www.flagarts.com/facultystaff/ Jennifer%20Spensieri/documents/ContrariansFull.pdf#page=109, 2003.
[14] A. Hamilton, “Rote learning isn’t necessarily a bad thing.” FMT News. Retrieved July 30, 2014 from http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/ category/opinion/2014/04/08/rote-learning-isnt-necessarily-a-bad-thing, April 2014.
[15] E. L. Deci, and R. M. Ryan, “Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.” New York: Plenum Publishing Co, 1985.
[16] K. Cherry, “What is Motivation?” Retrieved May 8, 2014 from http://psychology.about.com/od/mindex/g/motivation-definition.htm, May 2014.
[17] Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68-78.
[18] E. L. Deci, and R. M. Ryan, “Promoting Self Determined Education.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 38, pp. 3-41, 1994.
[19] G. Wilson, “The Effects of External Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.” Journal of HYPERplasia Research. Retrieved July 14, 2014, from http://www.abcbodybuilding.com/rewards.pdf, 2006.
[20] J. A. Fredericks, P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, “School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence.” Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, pp. 59-109, 2004.
[21] H. M. Marks, “Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years.” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 37, pp. 153-184, 2000.
[22] The Student Engagement Instrument (SEI), University Of Minnesota. Retrieved July 21, 2014, from http://checkandconnect.umn.edu/ research/engagement.html, 2014.
[23] J. Hamari, J. Koivisto, and H. Sarsa, “Does Gamification Work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification.” In proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, January 6-9, 2014.
[24] The Glossary of Education Reform, “Student Engagement.” Retrieved May 9, 2014 from http://edglossary.org/student-engagement, 2014.
[25] M. J. Furlong, and S. L. Christenson, “Engaging Students at School and with Learning: A Relevant Construct for All Students.” Psychology in the Schools, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 365–368, 2008.
[26] J. J. Appleton, S. L. Christenson, D. Kim, and A. L. Reschly, “Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument.” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 44, pp. 427–445, 2006.
[27] J. D. Finn, “Withdrawing from school.” Review of Educational Research, vol. 59, pp. 117–142, 1989.
[28] J. Marquis, “Debates about Gamification and Game-Based Learning (#GBL) in Education.” Classroom Aid – Connecting Dots of Digital Learning. Retrieved July 20, 2014, from http://classroomaid. com/2013/04/07/debates-about-gamification-and-game-basedlearninggbl- in-education, 2013.
[29] D. Eseryel, V. Law, D. Ifenthaler, X. Ge, and R. Miller, “An Investigation of the Interrelationships between Motivation, Engagement, and Complex Problem Solving in Game-based Learning.” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 42–53, 2014.
[30] X. Wu, R. C. Anderson, K. Nguyen-Jahiel, and B. Miller, “Enhancing Motivation and Engagement through Collaborative Discussion.” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 622-632, 2013.
[31] C. P. Carter, A. L. Reschly, M. D. Lovelace, J. J. Appleton, and D. Thompson, “Measuring Student Engagement Among Elementary Students: Pilot of the Student Engagement Instrument - Elementary Version.” School Psychology Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 61-73, 2012.