Organization of the Purchasing Function for Innovation

Authors: Jasna Prester, Ivana Rašić Bakarić, Božidar Matijević

Abstract:

Innovations not only contribute to competitiveness of the company but have also positive effects on revenues. On average, product innovations account to 14 percent of companies’ sales. Innovation management has substantially changed during the last decade, because of growing reliance on external partners. As a consequence, a new task for purchasing arises, as firms need to understand which suppliers actually do have high potential contributing to the innovativeness of the firm and which do not. Proper organization of the purchasing function is important since for the majority of manufacturing companies deal with substantial material costs which pass through the purchasing function. In the past the purchasing function was largely seen as a transaction-oriented, clerical function but today purchasing is the intermediate with supply chain partners contributing to innovations, be it product or process innovations. Therefore, purchasing function has to be organized differently to enable firm innovation potential. However, innovations are inherently risky. There are behavioral risk (that some partner will take advantage of the other party), technological risk in terms of complexity of products and processes of manufacturing and incoming materials and finally market risks, which in fact judge the value of the innovation. These risks are investigated in this work. Specifically, technological risks which deal with complexity of the products, and processes will be investigated more thoroughly. Buying components or such high edge technologies necessities careful investigation of technical features and therefore is usually conducted by a team of experts. Therefore it is hypothesized that higher the technological risk, higher will be the centralization of the purchasing function as an interface with other supply chain members. Main contribution of this research lies is in the fact that analysis was performed on a large data set of 1493 companies, from 25 countries collected in the GMRG 4 survey. Most analyses of purchasing function are done by case study analysis of innovative firms. Therefore this study contributes with empirical evaluations that can be generalized.

Keywords: Purchasing function organization, innovation, technological risk, GMRG 4 survey.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096915

References:

[1] Schumpeter, J.A. “The Theory of Economic Development: an Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle”. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ, 1982
[2] Davidsson, P., “Researching Entrepreneurship”, Springer, Boston, MA, 2004
[3] Kim, W.C., Maubourgne, R., “Blue ocean strategy”, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2005
[4] Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., BauschIs, A. “Innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 441–457, 2011.
[5] Goedhuys, M., Veugelers, R., “Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 516– 529, 2012.
[6] Evangelista, R., Mastrostefano, V.,“Firm size, sectors and countries as sources of variety in innovation”, Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, Vol. 15, pp. 247–270, 2006..
[7] Cáceres, R., Guzmán, J., Rekowski, M., “Firms as source of variety in innovation: influence of size and sector”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp 357-372, 2011
[8] Leiponen, A., Helfat, C. E., “Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 224- 236, 2010.
[9] Zhang, G. P., Yu, J., Xia, Y., “The Payback of Effective Innovation Programs: Empirical Evidence from Firms that Have Won Innovation Awards”, Production and Operations Management, DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01368.x, August 2012.
[10] Kim, D-Y., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., “Relationship between quality management practices and innovation” Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 295–315, May 2012.
[11] Kanda A, Deshmukh, S.G., “Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 115, No. 2, pp. 316–335, October 2008
[12] van Echtelt FEA, Wynstra F, van Weele AJ, Duysters G (2008) “Managing supplier involvement into New Product Development: a multiple case study”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 180–201, Jan. 2008.
[13] Howells J., “New directions in R&D: current and prospective challenges”, R&D Management, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp 241–252, June 2008.
[14] Lakemond N, van Echtelt F, Wynstra F., “A configuration typology for involving purchasing specialists in product development”, Journal Of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 37, No. 4., pp. 11–20, Apr. 2006.
[15] Schiele H., “Early supplier integration: the dual role of purchasing in new product development”, R&D Management, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 138– 153, Feb. 2010.
[16] Luzzini, D., Ronchi, S., “Organizing the purchasing department for innovation”, Operations Management Research, Vol. 4, No. 1-2, pp 14- 27, June 2011.
[17] Pearson, J.N., Gritzmacher, K.J., “Integrating purchasing into strategic management”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 91–99, June 1990.
[18] Van Weele, A. J., “Purchasing and Supply Chain Management: analysis, strategy, planning and practice”, Cengage Learning, Mason, OH, 2010.
[19] Smeltzer, L. R. and Siferd, S. P., “Proactive Supply Management: The Management of Risk”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 38–45, Apr. 2006.
[20] Narasimhan, R., Das, A., “The impact of purchasing integration and practices on manufacturing performance”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 593–609, Oct. 2001.
[21] Carr, A.S., Pearson, J.N., “Strategically managed buyer–supplier relationships and performance outcomes”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 497–519, Aug. 1999.
[22] Carr, A.S., Pearson, J.N., “The impact of purchasing and supplier involvement on strategic purchasing and its impact on firm’s performance”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp.1032 – 1053, 2002.
[23] Melander, L., Lakemond, N., ”Sourcing technology from suppliers in new product development – Purchasing’s role as a trouble shooter”, IPSERA 2012 Confenrence Proceedings. Purchasing & Supply Management in a Changing World, 1-4 Aril 2012 Nales Italy,(online) http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:547238/FULLTEXT01 Accessed 10.07.2013.
[24] Krause, D.R., Pagell, M., Curkovic, S., “Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 497–512, July 2001.
[25] Kersten, W. (Ed.), “Managing the Future Supply Chain : current concepts and solutions for reliability and robustness”, Joseph Eul Verlag, Lohmar-Koln, 2012.
[26] Schuh, G., Hoppe, M., “The Role of Purchasing in new Product Development–Results of a Consortium Benchmark Study”, in Kersten, W. (Ed.) (2012) Managing the Future Supply Chain : current concepts and solutions for reliability and robustness, Joseph Eul Verlag, Lohmar- Koln, 2012.
[27] Ettlie, J., “Managing Innovation”, Rutledge, New York, 2013.
[28] Svahn, S., Westerlund, M., “Purchasing strategies in supply relationships”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 24 No. 3-4, pp.173 – 181, 2009.
[29] Krause, D. R., Vachon, S. And Klassen, R. D., “Special Topic Forum On Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Introduction And Reflections On The Role Of Purchasing Management”, Journal Of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 45 No. 4., pp. 18–25, Sep. 2009.
[30] Zhang, C., Viswanathan, S., Henke Jr., J.W., “The boundary spanning capabilities of purchasing agents in buyer–supplier trust development”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 318–328, May 2011.
[31] Tidd, J., Bessant, J., “Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change”, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2011.
[32] Chiesa, V., Frattini, F., “Commercializing Technological Innovation: Learning from Failures in High-Tech Markets”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 437–454, March 2011.
[33] Ellis, S.C., Henry, R.M., Shockley, J., “Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 34–46, Jan. 2010.
[34] Wang, H., Chen, W-R., “Is firm-specific innovation associated with greater value appropriation? The roles of environmental dynamism and technological diversity”, Research Policy, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 141–154, Feb. 2010.
[35] Zsidisin, G.A., Panelli, A., Upton, R., “Purchasing organization involvement in risk assessments, contingency plans, and risk management: an exploratory study”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 187 – 198, April 2000.
[36] Whybark, D.C., “GMRG survey research in operations management”. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 686-696, July 1997.
[37] Whybark, C., Wacker, J., Sheu, C., “The Evolution of an International Academic Manufacturing Survey”.(online) http://www.decisionsciences.org/DecisionLine/Vol40/40_3/dsidl40_ 3pom.pdf, Accessed 5. 9 2010., May 2009.
[38] Leachman, C., Pegels, C.C., Shin, S.K., “Manufacturing performance: evaluation and determinants”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 851-874., Sept. 2005.
[39] Kraljic, P., “Purchasing must become supply management”, Harvard Business Review, Vol (9-10), pp. 109-117., Sept. 1983.