Anthropometric Profile and Its Influence on the Vital Signs of Baja California College Students
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Anthropometric Profile and Its Influence on the Vital Signs of Baja California College Students

Authors: J. A. Lopez, J. E. Olguín, C. Camargo, G. A. Quijano, R. Martínez

Abstract:

An anthropometric study applied to 1,115 students of the Faculty of Chemical Sciences and Engineering of the Autonomous University of California. Thirteen individual measurements were taken in a sitting position. The results obtained allow forming a reliable anthropometric database for statistical studies and analysis and inferences of specific distributions, so the opinion of experts in occupational medicine recommendations may emit to reduce risks resulting in an alteration of the vital signs during the execution of their school activities. Another use of these analyses is to use them as a reliable reference for future deeper research, to the design of spaces, tools, utensils, workstations, with anthropometric dimensions and ergonomic characteristics suitable to use.

Keywords: Anthropometry, vital signs, students.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096729

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2573

References:


[1] D. J. Oborne, "Ergonomics in action: the adaptation of the working environment to the man". Ed. Tracks. pp. 9–16.
[2] B. Grace, C. de Silver, A. Rueda, A. Padilla, “Anthropometry by age, gender and socioeconomic level of the school population of the urban area of Cali, Colombia. Colombia Médica, volume 34 No. 2, 2003.from the action research educational change.Elliot, j., publishing Morata, Madrid, Spain, 1993. pp. 19–22.
[3] J. E. L. Carter, “The Heath-Carter method somatotype”. San Diego: San Diego State University Press. 1980.pp. 34–39.
[4] D.T. Drinkwater, W. D. Ross, M. Ostyn, G, Beunen& J. Simosns (Eds.) Anthropometric fractionation of body mass. Kinanthropometry II. Baltimore: University Park Press. 1980. pp. 1178–1191.
[5] B.H. Heath, & J.E.L. Carter, “A modified somatotype method”. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, pp. 77–92. 1967.
[6] J. E. L. Carter, J. Lindsay, “Morphological factors that limit human performance”.PubliCE. pp. 78–111.
[7] H. B. León, G. S. Ramírez, M. M. Acosta, I. G.Echevarría,“The somatotype of Heath-Carter in free and Greco-Roman styles highperformance Cuban fighters”. Sports Medicine Institute. pp. 13–23.
[8] Marín P. Searching a Common Definition for Functional Limitation in Latin America. The Ge-rontologist 2004; 44 (Special Issue I): 550s.
[9] H. Silva, J. C. Bruneau, H.P. Reyno, S. Comte, “Somatotype and body mass index in a sample of adolescents of both sexes in the city of Temuco”, Chile. International Journal of Morphology. pp. 89–104.
[10] Bowker and Lieberman “Statistics for engineers”. Prentice Hall publishing, 1985. pp. 41–44.
[11] Mason, Lind and Marchal.“Statistics for management and Economics”. edit. Alfaomega, 10th Edition, 2000. pp. 15–34.
[12] Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-008-SSA2-1993, Control of nutrition, growth and development of the child and the adolescent. Criteria and procedures for the provision of the service. pp. 788–881.