Teaching Speaking Skills to Adult English Language Learners through ALM
Authors: Wichuda Kunnu, Aungkana Sukwises
Abstract:
Audio-lingual Method (ALM) is a teaching approach that is claimed that ineffective for teaching second/foreign languages. Because some linguists and second/foreign language teachers believe that ALM is a rote learning style. However, this study is done on a belief that ALM will be able to solve Thais’ English speaking problem. This paper aims to report the findings on teaching English speaking to adult learners with an “adapted ALM”, one distinction of which is to use Thai as the medium language of instruction. The participants are consisted of 9 adult learners. They were allowed to speak English more freely using both the materials presented in the class and their background knowledge of English. At the end of the course, they spoke English more fluently, more confidently, to the extent that they applied what they learnt both in and outside the class.
Keywords: Teaching English, Audio Lingual Method.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096630
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3954References:
[1] Foley, J.A. (2005). English in…..Thailand.RELC 30(2):223 – 234.
[2] Kamolwan Chomwong. (2003). Language Attitudes of Students International Program and Thai Program towards the Use of English among Thai People. M.A.ResearchPaper, ThammasatUniversity.
[3] Chamaiporn Puttarat. (1991). Dramaticartsstudents’needs of English Views of English Teachers, Learners, Alumni and Managers. M.E.ResearchPaper, KasetsartUniversity.
[4] Sukumal Nilrat.. (1991). The need analysis of using English for Architecture of The Faculty of Architecture at King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang. M.E.ResearchPaper, Srinakharinwirot University.
[5] Saowapak Sutticha. (1994). The Needs of English of the Naval Cadets in Naval Academy. M.A.ResearchPaper, KasetsartUniversity.
[6] Sokol, A.E. (1946). The Army Language Program. Journal of Higher Education 17(1):9-16.(online) Available from: http://links.jstor.org (Accessed 25/11/06).
[7] Larsen – Freeman, D.(2000).TechniquesandPrinciplesinLanguage Teaching (secondedition). Oxford: OxfordUniversityPress.
[8] Richards,J.C.andRogers,T.S. (2001).ApproachesandMethodsinLanguage Teaching (second edtion). Cambridge: CUP.
[9] Brown,H.D. (2000). Principle sof Language Learning and Teaching (fourth edition).NewYork:Longman.
[10] Mora, J. K. (2002).Second – LanguageTeaching Methods: Principles &Procedures. (online) Available from: http://coe.sdsu.edu./people/Jmora/ALM Methods.htm (Accessed 30/10/06.)
[11] Thanasoulas, D. (2002). The changing winds and shifting sands of the history of English Language Teaching. (online) Available from : http://www.englishclub.com/tefl-artcles/history - english - language – teaching.htm (Accessed 30/10/06).
[12] Brooks, N. (1964). Language and Language Learning : Theory and Practice .2 ed. New York: Harcourt Brace