Electroencephalography Based Brain-Computer Interface for Cerebellum Impaired Patients
Authors: Young-Seok Choi
Abstract:
In healthy humans, the cortical brain rhythm shows specific mu (~6-14 Hz) and beta (~18-24 Hz) band patterns in the cases of both real and imaginary motor movements. As cerebellar ataxia is associated with impairment of precise motor movement control as well as motor imagery, ataxia is an ideal model system in which to study the role of the cerebellocortical circuit in rhythm control. We hypothesize that the EEG characteristics of ataxic patients differ from those of controls during the performance of a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) task. Ataxia and control subjects showed a similar distribution of mu power during cued relaxation. During cued motor imagery, however, the ataxia group showed significant spatial distribution of the response, while the control group showed the expected decrease in mu-band power (localized to the motor cortex).
Keywords: Brain-computer interface, EEG, modulation, ataxia.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096501
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1968References:
[1] H. A. Teive, "Spinocerebellar ataxias”, Arg. Neuropsiquiatr., 67 (4) 1133–1142, 2009.
[2] X. Wang, H. Wang, "Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: Systematic patho-anatomical study reveals different phylogenetically defined regions of the cerebellum and neural pathways undergo different evolutions of the degenerative process”, Neuropathology, 30 (5) 501–514, 2010.
[3] B. Gonzalez, R. M. Ramirez, M. Sabate, "Disturbance of Motor Imagery After Cerebellar Stroke”, Behavioral Neurosciences, 119 (2), 622–626, 2005.
[4] D. J. McFarland, M. L. McCane, S. V. David, J. R. Wolpaw, "Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication. Electroencephalography”, Clini. Neurophysiol., 103(3), 386–394, 1997.
[5] L. J. Trejo, R. Rosipal, B. Matthews, "Brain-computer interfaces for 1-D and 2-D cursor control: designs using volitional control of the EEG spectrum or steady-state visual evoked potentials”, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 14 (2) 225–229, 2006.
[6] A. Chatterjee, V. Aggarwal, R. Ander, A. Soumyadipta, N. V. Thakor, "A brain-computer interface with vibrotactile biofeedback for haptic information,” J. Neuroeng. Rehail., 4(40), 2007.