A Review of Test Protocols for Assessing Coating Performance of Water Ballast Tank Coatings

Authors: Emmanuel A. Oriaifo, Noel Perera, Alan Guy, Pak. S. Leung, Kian T. Tan

Abstract:

Concerns on corrosion and effective coating protection of double hull tankers and bulk carriers in service have been raised especially in water ballast tanks (WBTs). Test protocols/methodologies specifically that which is incorporated in the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), Performance Standard for Protective Coatings for Dedicated Sea Water ballast tanks (PSPC) are being used to assess and evaluate the performance of the coatings for type approval prior to their application in WBTs. However, some of the type approved coatings may be applied as very thick films to less than ideally prepared steel substrates in the WBT. As such films experience hygrothermal cycling from operating and environmental conditions, they become embrittled which may ultimately result in cracking. This embrittlement of the coatings is identified as an undesirable feature in the PSPC but is not mentioned in the test protocols within it. There is therefore renewed industrial research aimed at understanding this issue in order to eliminate cracking and achieve the intended coating lifespan of 15 years in good condition. This paper will critically review test protocols currently used for assessing and evaluating coating performance, particularly the IMO PSPC.

Keywords: Corrosion Test, Hygrothermal Cycling, Coating Test Protocols, Water Ballast Tanks.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096381

References:

[1] ABS Guidance Note on the Inspection, Maintenance and Application of Marine Coating Systems 2007.
[2] E. Askheim, J.O. Nokleby, L. Carlsson, and M. Palm, "Why Do Paints Crack,” P.C.E, March 2001.
[3] J. Eliasson, D. Rauta, and T. Gunner, "Ballast Water Tank Coatings for the Future” CORROSION2005.
[4] C. H. Hare, "Failure Analysis Part:I”, JPCL, October 2001.
[5] IACS Recommendation 87 Guidelines for Coating Maintenance & Repairs for Ballast Tanks and Combined Cargo/Ballast tanks on Oil Tanker. June 2006.
[6] International Maritime Organisation Performance Standard for Protective Coating (IMO PSPC).
[7] D.M. George and J. Eliasson, "Future Cargo and Ballast Tank Lining for Ship Tanks – Forward Looking Technology”, SSPC 2005 New Orleans.
[8] D.M. George and J. Eliasson, "Factors Influencing Early Crack Development in Marine Cargo and Ballast Tank Coatings”.
[9] K. B. Tator, "Risk Assessment and Economic Considerations When Coating Ballast Tanks”, NIST 2004 Special Publication 1035.
[10] L. Thorsten, "Implementing The IMO PSPC for Ballast Water Tanks,” JPCL February 2009.
[11] H. Vold, "Evaluating Protective Coating for Ballast Tanks”, PCE, June 1997.
[12] B. J. Zhang, C. Lim, B. C. Kim, and D. G. Lee, "Stress Analysis and Evaluation of Cracks Developed on Coatings for Welded Joints of Water Ballast Tanks”, CORROSION2005.
[13] J. Azevedo, "A New Approach for Ballast & Cargo Tank Coating: A Solvent-Free and Humidity Tolerant Epoxy System with Edge-Retentive Properties”.
[14] National Research Council "Stemming the Tide” (1996 p.22). Controlling Introductions of Nonindigenous Species by Ship’ Ballast Water
[15] I. Rowell, "Tankers and FPSO Corrosion”, NIST 2004 Special Publication 1035
[16] P.F. Weber, "An Overview of the Tanker Structure Cooperative Forum”, TSCF 2007 Shipbuilders Meeting
[17] DNV "Classification Focus on Protective Coating”, October 1998