The Academic Achievement of Writing via Project-Based Learning
Authors: Duangkamol Thitivesa
This paper focuses on the use of project work as a pretext for applying the conventions of writing, or the correctness of mechanics, usage, and sentence formation, in a content-based class in a Rajabhat University. Its aim was to explore to what extent the student teachers’ academic achievement of the basic writing features against the 70% attainment target after the use of project is. The organization of work around an agreed theme in which the students reproduce language provided by texts and instructors is expected to enhance students’ correct writing conventions. The sample of the study comprised of 38 fourth-year English major students. The data was collected by means of achievement test and student writing works. The scores in the summative achievement test were analyzed by mean score, standard deviation, and percentage. It was found that the student teachers do more achieve of practicing mechanics and usage, and less in sentence formation. The students benefited from the exposure to texts during conducting the project; however, their automaticity of how and when to form phrases and clauses into simple/complex sentences had room for improvement.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096051Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2599
 P. Klanrit, "Communicative Activities for developing English speaking proficiency in Thailand”, University of Melbourne, unpublished.
 G. I. Yuwono, and L. Harbon. English Teacher Professionalism and Professional Development: Some Common Issues in Indonesia. Asian EFL Journal. 2010. 12(3): 145-163.
 Partnership for 21st Century Skills, retrieved from http://www.p21.org/overview/skills-framework/57.
 R. Phillipson, retrieved from chinaholisticenglish.org/articles/trojanhorse. pdf on 14 August 2012.
 Office of the Education Council. (2004). Education In Thailand 2004 , Bangkok, Thailand.
 E. G. Woods, (1989). Some criteria for the development of communicative grammar tasks. TESOL Quarterly.
 H. G. Widdowson, (1983) Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 Moss, D. (1998). Project-based learning and assessment: A resource manual for teachers. Arlingtin, VA: The Arlington Education and Employment Program.
 F. Stroller, (1997). Project Work: A Means to Promote Language Content. English Teaching Foreum, 35(4), 29-37.
 Mikulec, E. and Miller, P. Chamness, (2011). Using Project-Based instruction to Meet Foreign Language Standards. The Clearing House, 84: 81-86.
 Foulger, Teresa S. and Jimenez-Silva, Margartita, (2007). Enhancing the Writing Development of English Language Learners: Teacher Perceptions of Common Technology in Project-based Learning, Journal of Research in Childhood Education, Vol.22,. no.2, p.109.
 Legutke, M. and H. Thomas, (1991). Process and Experience in the Language Classroom. Harlow: Longman.
 T. Iakovos, (2011). Content-based instruction in the teaching of English as a Foreign Language, Review of European Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, June.
 G. H. Beckett and T. Slater, (2005) The Project Framework: a tool for language, content, and skills integration, ELT Journal Volume 59/2 April, Oxford University Press, p. 108-116.
 F. Stoller, (2002). Project work: A means to promote language and content. In J. C. Richards & W.A. Renandya (Eds.). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 107-119). Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.
 M. Eusebia Iris, 2009. Student Performance, Student Motivation and Project Work in the EFL Classroom: Is There a Link?, The International Journal of Learning , 16, Number 7, 2009, p. 1-14.
 A. Poulsen, K. lam, S. Cisneros, T. Trust, (2008). ARCS Model of Motivational Design, EDTEC 544, November.
 D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and E. J. Holubec, (1994), The new circles of learning: cooperation in the classroom and school, Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.