Currency Boards in Crisis: Experience of Baltic Countries

Authors: Gordana Kordić, Petra Palić

Abstract:

The European countries that during the past two decades based their exchange rate regimes on currency board arrangement (CBA) are usually analysed from the perspective of corner solution choice’s stabilisation effects. There is an open discussion on the positive and negative background of a strict exchange rate regime choice, although it should be seen as part of the transition process towards the monetary union membership. The focus of the paper is on the Baltic countries that after two decades of a rigid exchange rate arrangement and strongly influenced by global crisis are finishing their path towards the euro zone. Besides the stabilising capacity, the CBA is highly vulnerable regime, with limited developing potential. The rigidity of the exchange rate (and monetary) system, despite the ensured credibility, do not leave enough (or any) space for the adjustment and/or active crisis management. Still, the Baltics are in a process of recovery, with fiscal consolidation measures combined with (painful and politically unpopular) measures of internal devaluation. Today, two of them (Estonia and Latvia) are members of euro zone, fulfilling their ultimate transition targets, but de facto exchanging one fixed regime with another. The paper analyses the challenges for the CBA in unstable environment since the fixed regimes rely on imported stability and are sensitive to external shocks. With limited monetary instruments, these countries were oriented to the fiscal policies and used a combination of internal devaluation and tax policy measures. Despite their rather quick recovery, our second goal is to analyse the long term influence that the measures had on the national economy.

Keywords: Currency Board Arrangement, internal devaluation, exchange rate regime, Great recession.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096031

References:

[1] H. Hanke and K. Schuler, Currency Boards for Developing Countries, A Handbook, 2000.
[2] A. R. Ghosh; A-M.Gulde, C. H. Wolf: Exchange Rate Regimes: Choices and Consequences, 2002., MIT
[3] International Monetary Fund, Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions, 2013.
[4] K. Schuler: „What Use is Monetary Sovereignty" in The Dollarization Debate (edts: D. Salvatore, W. J. Dean, D. T. Willet) Oxford University Press 2003., pp. 140-153.
[5] I. K. Škabić and A. Mihaljević, „New Member States of the EU and EMU – Convergence and the Financial Crisis", Ekonomski vjesnik, No. 1/2010., pp. 12-26.
[6] A. R. Ghosh, S. M. Qureshi and Ch. G. Tsangarides, "The Cost of Tying One’s Hands”, IMF Finance & Development, June 2014., pp. 43-46.
[7] A. Hansson, M. and Randveer, M.,"Economic Adjustment in the Baltic Countries", Working Paper of Eesti Pank, No.1/2013
[8] Eurostat database
[9] A. Matysek-Jędrych; ”Competitiveness and Crisis – The case of Baltic States Economies", Working Paper, Faculty of International Business and Economics Poznan University of Economics,WP/2012/01
[10] I. T. Berend, Europe in crisis; Routledge, New York, 2013.