Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30379
Iran’s Gas Flare Recovery Options Using MCDM

Authors: Halle Bakhteeyar, Azadeh Maroufmashat, Sourena Sattari Khavas, Abbas Maleki

Abstract:

In this paper, five options of Iran’s gas flare recovery have been compared via MCDM method. For developing the model, the weighing factor of each indicator an AHP method is used via the Expert-choice software. Several cases were considered in this analysis. They are defined where the priorities were defined always keeping one criterion in first position, while the priorities of the other criteria were defined by ordinal information defining the mutual relations of the criteria and the respective indicators. The results, show that amongst these cases, priority is obtained for CHP usage where availability indicator is highly weighted while the pipeline usage is obtained where environmental indicator highly weighted and the injection priority is obtained where economic indicator is highly weighted and also when the weighing factor of all the criteria are the same the Injection priority is obtained.

Keywords: Gas, Iran, flare

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1095953

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2969

References:


[1] Hamso B., Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership, GGFR (Global Gas Flaring Reduction), 2013. Retrieved March, 15, 2014. Available at: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd= 3&cad=rja&uact=8&sqi=2&ved=0CDkQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2F www.ipieca.org%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2Fevent-materials%2FWeds_ 0910_Hamso_Global_gas_flaring_reduction_partnership.pdf&ei=zyMk U5-BHqe_ygOqh4IQ&usg=AFQjCNFvukkLNnsRugRI6Mxeg_F52Cz LdA&bvm=bv.62922401,d.Yms
[2] WO (World Oil) News Center, 2013. Iran flaring gas worth billions due to U.S. and EU sanctions, Retrieved march, 9, 2014. Available at: http://www.worldoil.com/Iran_flaring_gas_worth_billions_due_to_US_ and_EU_sanctions.html
[3] EIA (the US Energy Information Administration), 2013c. Country Analysis Briefs. Iran, Retrieved March, 28, 2013. Available at: .
[4] GGFR (Global Gas Flaring Reduction), 2013. Retrieved May, 26, 2014. Available at: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/ EXTOGMC/EXTGGFR/0,,contentMDK:22137498~menuPK:3077311~ pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:578069,00.html
[5] M.R. Rahimpour, Z. Jamshidnejad, S.M. Jokar, G. Karimi, A. Ghorbani, A.H. Mohammadi, A comparative study of three different methods for flare gas recovery of Asalooye Gas Refinery. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 4 (2012) 17-28.
[6] Bjorndalen, N., Mustafiz, S., Rahman, M.H., Islam, M.R., 2005. Noflare design: converting waste to value addition. Energy Sources 27, 371-380.
[7] Broere, W., 5 May 2008. The Elusive Goal to Stop Flares, Shell World. http://www.shell.com.
[8] Trading Economics, World Bank Indicators - iran – Emissions. Available at: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/iran/co2-emissionsmetric- tons-per-capita-wb-data.html.
[9] Moniz J.M., Jacoby D.H., Meggs J.M.A., et al., 2011. The Future of Natural Gas. An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Available at:< https://mitei.mit.edu/system/files/NaturalGas_Report.pdf >.
[10] BP (British Petrolum), 2013. Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2013. Available at< http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/statisticalreview/ statistical_review_of_world_energy_2013.pdf>.
[11] Asalooye Gas Refinery Data from South-Pars Gas Company, 2011, Asalooye, Iran.
[12] H. Schulz, Short history and present trends of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, Appl.Catal. A: Gen. 186 (1999) 3–12.
[13] L. Iandoli, S. Kjelstrup, Energy analysis of a GTL process based on low temperature slurry FT reactor technology with a cobalt catalyst, Energy Fuels, 21 (2007) 2317–2324.
[14] H. Dale Beggs, Gas Production Operations, Oil & Gas Consultants International Inc., 1984.
[15] P.W. Fisher, D. Brennan, Minimize flaring with flare gas recovery, 2002 (http://www.johnzink.com).