Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30517
Relationship between Facebook Usage and the Student Engagement of Sri Lankan Management Undergraduates

Authors: L. C. H. Jayarathna, W. M. N. Fernando


Academics and researchers are interested in the effects of social media on college students, with a specific focus on the most popular social media website; Facebook. Previous studied have found contradictory result on the relationship between Facebook usage and the student engagement with positive, detrimental and no significant relationships. However, these studies were limited to western higher education system. This paper fills a gap in the literature by using a sample (300) of Sri Lankan management undergraduates to examine the relationship between Facebook usage and student engagement. Student engagement was measured 35 item scale based on the National Survey of Student Engagement and Facebook usage by Facebook intensity scale. Descriptive statistics, path analysis and structural equation modeling were applied as statistical tools and techniques. Results indicate that student engagement scale was significantly negatively related with the Facebook usage with the influence from student engagement on Facebook usage.

Keywords: Student Engagement, social networking sites, Facebook Intensity

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3251


[1] Comscore. (2007). comScore Media Metrix Releases Top 50 Web Ranking for July. Retrieved December 23, 2013, from
[2] Wang, J., Lin, C.-F. C., Yu2, W.-C. W., & Wu, E. (2013). Meaningful Engagement in Facebook Learning Environments: Merging Social and Academic Lives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14, 302-322.
[3] staff, M. (2007). College Students: Facebook Top Site, Social Networking Really Hot. Retrieved December 25, 2013, from
[4] Hargittai, E. (2007). Who’s Space? Differences among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276-297.
[5] Junco, R. (2011). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58, 162 – 171.
[6] Junco, R. (2010). Using Emerging Technologies to Engage Students and Enhance Their Success. Retrieved January 27, 2014, from
[7] Socialbakers. (2013). Student Sri Lanka. Retrieved November 03, 2013, from
[8] Varma, R. (2009). Gender differences in factors influencing students towards computing. Computer Science Education, 19(1), 37-49.
[9] Junco, R., Heiberger, G., &Loken, E. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 01-18.
[10] Ruleman, A. B. (2012). Social media at the university: a demographic comparison. New Library World, 113 (7/8), 316 - 332.
[11] Rulemana, A. B. (2013). Comparison of Faculty and Student Ownership and Use of Technology. Technical Services Quarterly, 30(1), 38-55.
[12] Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement?
[13] Pascarella, E., &Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students: Athird decade of research. San Francisco (02 Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
[14] Conard, M. A. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(3), 339–346.
[15] O’Connor, M. C., &Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 971–990.
[16] Ojalvo, H. E. (2011). How Facebook Use Correlates With Student Outcomes. Retrieved December 23, 2013, from, Journal of College Student Development, 683–706.
[17] Junco, R. (2013). Inequalities in Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2328-2336.
[18] Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
[19] Carini, R. M., D. Kuh, G., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32.
[20] Brint, S., Cantwell, A. M., & Hanne, R. A. (2008). The Two Cultures of Undergraduate Academic Engagement. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 383-402.
[21] Pascarellaa, E. T., Seifertb, T. A., &Blaich, C. (2010). How effective are the NSSE Benchmarks in Predicting Important Educational Outcomes? The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(1), 16-22.
[22] Bentler, P., & Bonnet, D. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
[23] Appleton, J., Christenson, S., Kim, &Reschly, A. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445.