Sustainability as a Criterion in the Reconstruction of Libya’s Public Transport Infrastructure

Authors: Haitam Emhemad, Brian Agnew, David Greenwood

Abstract:

Amongst the many priorities facing Libya following the 2011 uprising is the provision of a transport infrastructure that will meet the nation’s needs and not undermine its prospects for economic prosperity as with many developing economies non-technical issues such as management, planning and financing are the major barriers to the efficient and effective provision of transport infrastructure. This is particularly true in the case of the effective incorporation of sustainability criteria, and the research upon which this paper is based involves the examination of alternative ways of approaching this problem. It is probably fair to say that criteria that relate to sustainability have not, historically, featured strongly in Libya’s approach to the development of its transport infrastructure. However, the current reappraisal of how best to redevelop the country’s transport infrastructure that has been afforded by recent events may offer the opportunity to alter this. The research examines recent case studies from a number of countries to explore ways in which sustainability has been included as a criterion for planning and procurement decisions. There will also be an in-depth investigation into the Libyan planning and legislative context to examine the feasibility of the introduction of such sustainability criteria into the process of planning and procurement of Libya’s transport infrastructure.

Keywords: Libya Reconstruction, Sustainability criteria, Transport Infrastructure.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1094062

References:

[1] E. Akampurira, D. Root, and W. Shakantu, "Stakeholder perceptions in the factors constraining the development and implementation of public private partnerships in the Ugandan electricity sector," Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, vol. 20, p. 2009, 2009.
[2] R. Čiegis, R. Čiegis, and E. Jasinskas, "Concepts of strong comparability and commensurability versus concepts of strong and weak sustainability," Engineering Economics, pp. 31-35, 2005.
[3] R. Čiegis, A. Gavenauskas, N. Petkevičiūte, and D. Štreimikiene, "Ethical values and sustainable development: Lithuanian experience in the context of globalisation," Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 14, pp. 29-37, 2008.
[4] R. Čiegis and D. Gineitiene, "Participatory aspects of strategic sustainable development planning in local communities: Experience of Lithuania," Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 14, pp. 107-117, 2008.
[5] R. Ciegis and D. Streimikiene, "Integration of sustainable development indicators into sustainable development programmes," Inzineriné Ekonomika, vol. 2, pp. 7-12, 2005.
[6] M. B. Davies, "Doing a uccessful Research Project," 2007.
[7] C. Mihyeon Jeon and A. Amekudzi, "Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: definitions, indicators, and metrics," Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 11, pp. 31-50, 2005.
[8] L. Ministry of Transport, "Annual Report Ministry Activities, Ministry of Transport, Libya.," 2011- 2012.
[9] H. S. K. Nathan and B. S. Reddy, "Towards a conceptual framework for development of sustainable development indicators for an urban setup," International Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 15, pp. 187-205, 2012.
[10] J. Nichols, N. Garrick, and C. Atkinson-Palombo, "Framework for Developing Indicators of Sustainability for Transportation Planning," in Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, 2009.
[11] T. A. W. C. Report, "World Economic Forum and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)," 2013.
[12] D. Silverman, Qualitative research: Sage, 2010.
[13] F. Stewart and J. Yermo, "Infrastructure Investment in New Markets: Challenges and Opportunities for Pension Funds," OECD Publishing2012.
[14] J. w Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: SAGE Publications, Incorporated, 2009.