Evaluating the Sustainability of Agricultural by Indicator that Appropriate to the Area of Ban Phaeo District, Samut Sakorn Province, Thailand
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Evaluating the Sustainability of Agricultural by Indicator that Appropriate to the Area of Ban Phaeo District, Samut Sakorn Province, Thailand

Authors: N. Talisa, K. Rungsarid, P. Chakrit

Abstract:

The objectives of the research are to study the existing agricultural patterns, and to evaluate the sustainability of agricultural on economic, social and environmental aspects. The samplings were the representatives of the agriculturist group from Ban Paew district, Samut Sakorn province by purposive sampling method of 30 households. The tools being used were interview forms together with the Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA) and the Participation Rural Appraisal (PRA). The information collected was analyzed with the principle of Content Analysis andusing Descriptive Statistics. After that all the information gotten was analyze the sustainability on the household level and village level. The research result can be concluded as follows: The agricultural Patterns: For most of the cultivation main crop was fruit trees planted and the supplement crop was around the patch or added other plants in the trenches. There were trenches for the cultivating water. The product distribution was by selling (97.5%) and the selling to middle man was the highest number (62.5%). Evaluating the sustainability of the agricultural by the indicators which were appropriate to the area: For the agricultural sustainability on the household level it was found that only one household had sustainable, others household had conditioned sustainable. For on the village level it was found that the sustainability on the issue of agricultural knowledge training had the lowest level (Sustainability index = 31.67%). Secondary was the acknowledging about soil information (Sustainability index = 35.0), and the household labors on agriculture, net return over cash cost (Sustainability index = 55.0%) respectively. Performance percentage is 48.81 %. It was brought to the conclusion that this area did not have the agricultural sustainability.

Keywords: Sustainability of agricultural, sustainability indicators, sustainability index.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1093900

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1657

References:


[1] A. Philipp, "What is sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence of diverging views in Switzerland and New Zeland,” Journal of Ecological Economic, vol. 68, pp. 1872 - 1882, 2009.
[2] S. Mueller, Evaluating the sustainability of agriculture: The case of the Reventado River Watershed in Costa Rica. European University Studies. Series 5. Economics and management Peter Lang GmbH. Germany, 1997.
[3] National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. Farming for the Future: A Sustainable Agriculture Agenda for the 2012 Food &Farm Bill. Washington D.C., 2012.
[4] The Office of SamutSakhon Province, Annual Report 2012.Samut Sakhon, 2012.
[5] M. Munasinghe, Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development. World Bank Environment Paper Number 3. The world Bank, Washington D.C. 1993.
[6] B. Barbara, Sustainability Assesment : A Review of Values, Concepts, and Methodological Approaches.Issues in Agriculture 10.
[7] D.J. Pannell, "What is The Value of a Sustainability Indicators? Economic Issues in Monitoring and Management for sustainability” Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, vol. 43,pp. 239-243, 2003.
[8] P. Suwanna and S. Sirijinda. Sustainable Agricultural Systems Planning on Highland Area of Northern Thailand. Bangkok :Kasetsart University, 2005.
[9] WRR. Sustained Risks: A Lasting Phenomenon. Sdu---11 Uitgeverij, The Hague, Reports to the Government 44, 1995.