Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30526
Constructivism Learning Management in Mathematical Analysis Courses

Authors: K. Paisal

Abstract:

The purposes of this research were (1) to create a learning activity for constructivism, (2) study the Mathematical Analysis courses learning achievement, and (3) study students’ attitude toward the learning activity for constructivism. The samples in this study were divided into 2 parts including 3 Mathematical Analysis courses instructors of Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University who provided basic information and attended the seminar and 17 Mathematical Analysis courses students who were studying in the academic and engaging in the learning activity for constructivism. The research instruments were lesson plans constructivism, subjective Mathematical Analysis courses achievement test with reliability index of 0.8119, and an attitude test concerning the students’ attitude toward the Mathematical Analysis courses learning activity for constructivism. The result of the research show that the efficiency of the Mathematical Analysis courses learning activity for constructivism is 73.05/72.16, which is more than expected criteria of 70/70. The research additionally find that the average score of learning achievement of students who engaged in the learning activities for constructivism are equal to 70% and the students’ attitude toward the learning activity for constructivism are at the medium level.

Keywords: constructivism, Learning Management, Mathematical Analysis courses

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1093886

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1481

References:


[1] Bloom,Benjamin s. (1976).Human Characteristics and School Leaning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[2] Bruner, Jerome Seymour.(1966).The Process of Education.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[3] Commission of National Education.(1997).Plans National Education Act No.8 1997-2001.Bangkok:Office of the Prime Minister.
[4] Department of Education Ministry .(2000).Law of the Nation Education 1999.Bangkok: Kuruspha Press.
[5] Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology.(2008). Standards of learning in Science and Technology.Bangkok: Printed in Learning Science and Technology Institution.
[6] Thatong, Knuth (2011). Teaching Thinking. Bangkok: Pechakasem Press.
[7] Noypitaksa,S.(2008). The Study of the Relationship Between Learning and Self- consciousness in the Ability in Learning Mathematics and Problem Solving of Mathayomsuksa 3 Student.Master of Education. Srinakarinwirot University.
[8] Prachumkayormat, S. (2009). The Comparison of the Ability in Mathematic Problem Solving and IQ of Matthayom Suksa 1 Students by using Problem Solving Learning Cell, Master of Education , Srinakarinwirot University.
[9] Somvong Plangprasochoke.(2003).Problems of Teaching Mathematics. Bangkok: Pra Nakhon Rajabhat University Press.
[10] Tipphauakong, S. (2001). Mathematic Problem Solving. Bangkok: The Teacher’s Counsil of Thailand Ladprow Publishing
[11] Yong.Carolyn.(1972)."Team Learning,”The Arithmatics Teacher. December.