Failure to Replicate the Unconscious Thought Advantages

Authors: Vladimíra Čavojová, Eva Ballová Mikušková

Abstract:

In this study we tried to replicate the unconscious thought advantage (UTA), which states that complex decisions are better handled by unconscious thinking. We designed an experiment in e-prime using similar material as the original study (choosing between four different apartments, each described by 12 attributes). A total of 73 participants (52 women (71.2%); 18 to 62 age: M=24.63; SD=8.7) took part in the experiment. We did not replicate the results suggested by UTT. However, from the present study we cannot conclude whether this was the case of flaws in the theory or flaws in our experiment and we discuss several ways in which the issue of UTA could be examined further.

Keywords: Decision making, unconscious thoughts, UTT.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1093558

References:

[1] Dijksterhuis, A., &Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A Theory of Unconscious Thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 95–109.
[2] Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(5), 586–98. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.87.5.586
[3] Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Sjoerdsma, A., van Baaren, R. B., &Nordgren, L. F. (2011). A Meta-Analysis on Unconscious Thought Effects. Social Cognition, 29(6), 738–762. doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.738
[4] Nieuwenstein, M., & van Rijn, H. (2012). The unconscious thought advantage: Further replication failures from a search for confirmatory evidence. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(6), 779–798.
[5] Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratiobias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 972–987.
[6] Bos, M. W., Dijksterhuis, A., & Van Baaren, R. B. (2008). On the goaldependency of unconscious thought. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1114–1120.
[7] Queen, T. L., & Hess, T. M. (2010). Age differences in the effects of conscious and unconscious thought in decision making. Psychology and Aging, 25, 251–261.
[8] Usher, M., Russo, Z., Weyers, M., Brauner, R., &Zakay, D. (n.d.). The impact of the mode of thought in complex decisions: Intuitive decisions are better. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00037
[9] Acker, F. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and metaanalysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 292–303.
[10] Lassiter, G. D., Lindberg, M. J., Gonzalez-Vallejo, C., Belleza, F. S., & Phillips, N. D. (2009). The deliberation-without attention effect: Evidence for an artifactual interpretation. Psychological Science, 20, 671–675.
[11] Rey, A., Goldstein, R. M., &Perruchet, P. (2009). Does unconscious thought improve complex decision making? Psychological Research, 73, 372–379.
[12] Thorsteinson, T. J., &Withrow, S. (2009). Does unconscious thought outperform conscious thought on complex decisions? A further examination. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 235–247.
[13] Van De Wiel, M. W. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Meeuwesen, E. W., &Wiers, R. W. (2009). Expertise Effects on Immediate, Deliberate and Unconscious Thought in Complex Decision Making. In Proceedings of the 31stAnnual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 733– 738). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
[14] Waroquier, L., Marchiori, D., Klein, O., &Cleeremans, A. (2009). Methodological pitfalls of the unconscious thought paradigm. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 601–610.
[15] Waroquier, L., Marchiori, D., Klein, O., &Cleeremans, A. (2010). Is it better to think unconsciously or to trust your first impression? A reassessment of unconscious thought theory. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1, 111–118.
[16] Hanák, R., Sirota, M., &Juanchich, M. (2013). Experts Use Compensatory Strategies More Often Than Novices In Hiring Decisions. StudiaPsychologica, 55(4), 251-264.
[17] Glöckner, A., &Witteman, C. (2010). Foundation for tracing intuition: models, findings, categorizations. In A. Glöckner& C. Witteman (Eds.), Foundation for tracing intuition: Challenges and Methods (pp. 1–23). Hove and New York: Psychology Press.