Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30140
Nutrients Removal Control via an Intermittently Aerated Membrane Bioreactor

Authors: Junior B. N. Adohinzin, Ling Xu

Abstract:

Nitrogen is among the main nutrients encouraging the growth of organic matter and algae which cause eutrophication in water bodies. Therefore, its removal from wastewater has become a worldwide emerging concern. In this research, an innovative Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) system named “moving bed membrane bioreactor (MBMBR)” was developed and investigated under intermittently-aerated mode for simultaneous removal of organic carbon and nitrogen.

Results indicated that the variation of the intermittently aerated duration did not have an apparent impact on COD and NH4+–N removal rate, yielding the effluent with average COD and NH4+–N removal efficiency of more than 92 and 91% respectively. However, in the intermittently aerated cycle of (continuously aeration/0s mix), (aeration 90s/mix 90s) and (aeration 90s/mix 180s); the average TN removal efficiency was 67.6%, 69.5% and 87.8% respectively. At the same time, their nitrite accumulation rate was 4.5%, 49.1% and 79.4% respectively. These results indicate that the intermittently aerated mode is an efficient way to controlling the nitrification to stop at nitrition; and also the length of anoxic duration is a key factor in improving TN removal.

Keywords: Membrane bioreactor (MBR), Moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), Nutrients removal, Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1093291

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1936

References:


[1] Leiknes T, Ødegaard H. The development of a biofilm membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 2007, 202(1-2-3): 135-143.
[2] Rusten B, Eikebrokk B, Yngve U, Lygren E. Design and operations of the Kaldnes moving bed biofilm reactors. Aquacultural Engineering, 2006, 34(3): 322-331
[3] Williams SC, Beresford J (1998) The effect of anaerobic zone mixing on the performance of a three-stage Bardenpho plant. Water SciTechnol 38(1):55–62.
[4] Pai TY, Tsai YP, Chou YJ, Chang HY, Leu HG, Ouyang CF (2004) Microbial kinetic analysis of three different types of EBNR process. Chemosphere 55: 109–118
[5] Canziani R, Emondi V, Garavaglia M et al. Effect of oxygen concentration on biological nitrification and microbial kinetics in a cross-flow membrane bioreactor (MBR) and moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) treating old landfill leachate. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 286(1-2): 202-212.
[6] Suvilampi E, Marja A, Tiirola et al. Microbial diversity in a thermophilic aerobic biofilm process: analysis by length heterogeneity PCR (LH-PCR). Water Research, 2003, 37(10): 2259-2268.
[7] Andreottola G, Foladori P, Ragazzi M et al. Experimental comparison between MBBR and activated sludge system for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Sci.Technol, 2000, 41(4-5): 375-382.
[8] Rusten B, Kolkinn O, Ødegaard H. Moving bed biofilm reactors and chemical precipitation for high efficiency treatment of wastewater from small communities. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 35(6): 71-79.
[9] Gunder, B., Krauth, K., 1998. Replacement of secondary clarification by membrane separation–results with plate and hollow fiber modules. Water Science and Technology 38 (4–5), 383–393.
[10] Anderson, G.K., Saw, C.B., Fernandez, M.I.A.P., 1986. Applications of porous membranes for biomass retention in biological wastewater treatment processes. Process Biochemistry 12, 174–182.
[11] Yamagiwa, K., Yoshida, M., Ito, A., et al. 1998. A new oxygen supply method for simultaneous organic carbon removal and nitrification by a one-stage biofilm process. Water Science and Technology 37, 117–124.
[12] APHA, 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association.