Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31181
Cyber Aggression / Cyber Bullying and the Dark Triad: Effect on Workplace Behavior / Performance

Authors: Anishya Obhrai Madan


In an increasingly connected world, where speed of communication attempts to match the speed of thought and thus intentions; conflict gets actioned faster using media like the internet and telecommunication technology. This has led to a new form of aggression: “cyber bullying”. The present paper attempts to integrate existing theory on bullying, and the dark triad personality traits in a work environment and extrapolate it to the cyber context.

Keywords: conflict at work, cyber bullying, dark triad of personality, toxic employee

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3975


[1] D. Olweus, Bully/victim problems among school children: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In Rubin & D. Pepler (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 1991 pp 9.
[2] J. J. Dooley, J. Pyzalski and D. Cross, Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review. Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 2009, pp. 182–188.
[3] J. Patchin and S. Hinduja, "Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying”, Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2006, pp. 148-69.
[4] M. L. Ybarra, and K. J. Mitchell, Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2004, pp. 1308–1316.
[5] R. M. Kowalski, and S. P. Limber, Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 2007, pp. 22–30.
[6] F. Mishna, M. Saini, and S. Solomon, Ongoing and online: Children and youth’s perceptions of cyber bullying. Children & Youth Services Review, 31, 2009, pp. 1222–1228.
[7] J. Zaki and K. N. Ochsner, The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls, and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 2012, pp. 675–680.
[8] D. L. Paulhus and K. M. Williams, The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 2002, pp. 556–563.
[9] S. Jacobwitz and V. Egan, The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 2006, pp. 331–339.
[10] D. N. Jones and A. J. Figueredo, "The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the Dark Triad". European Journal of Personality, 2013.
[11] N. R. Crick and K. A. Dodge, Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 1996, pp. 993–1002.
[12] D. M. Law, J. D. Shapka, S. Hymel, B. F. Olson and T. Waterhouse, The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2012, pp. 226–232.
[13] S. Feshbach, The function of aggression and the regulations of aggressive drive. Psychological Review, 71, 1964, pp. 257–272.
[14] F. Sticca and S. Perrin, Is Cyberbullying Worse than Traditional Bullying? Examining the Differential Roles of Medium, Publicity, and Anonymity for the Perceived Severity of Bullying. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 42, 2013, pp.739–750.
[15] K. Runions, J. D. Shapka, J. Dooley and K. Modecki, Cyberaggression and -victimization and social information processing: Integrating the medium and the message. Psychology of Violence, 3, 2013, pp. 9–26.
[16] R. R. C. Howard, The quest for excitement: A missing link between personality disorder and violence? The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22, 2011, pp. 692–705.
[17] K. C. Runions, Toward a Conceptual Model of Motive and Self-Control in Cyber-Aggression: Rage, Revenge, Reward, and Recreation. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 42, 2013, pp. 751–771.
[18] K. A. Dodge and J. D. Coie, Social information processing factors in reactiveand proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1987, pp. 1146–1158.
[19] J. D. Shapka, Internet socializing online: What are the risks? Presented at Curtin University of Technology, March 2011, Perth, Australia.
[20] J. Richetin, D. S. Richardson and D. M.Boykin, Role of prevolitional processes in aggressive behavior: The indirect influence of goal. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 2011, pp. 36–47.
[21] P. L. McLeod, R. S. Baron, M. W. Mart and K. Yoon, The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 1997, pp. 706–718.
[22] L. R. Huesmann, L. D. Eron, M. M. Lefkowitz and L. O. & Walder, Stability of aggression over time and generations. Developmental Psychology, 20, 1984, pp. 1120–1134.
[23] D. Koehn, Facing the phenomenon of evil. International Management Review, 3, 2007, pp. 38-59.
[24] B. L. Galperin, R. J. Bennett and K. Aquino, Status differentiation and the protean self: A social-cognitive model of unethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 2010, pp. 407–424.
[25] S. A. Rosenthal and T. L. Pittinsky, Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 2006, pp. 617–633.
[26] C. R. P. Boddy, Corporate psychopaths and organizational type. Journal of Public Affairs, 10, 2010, pp. 300–312.
[27] I. Zettler, N. Friedrich and B. E. Hilbig, Dissecting work commitment: The role of Machiavellianism. Career Development International, 16, 2011, pp. 20–35.
[28] K. Kiazad, S. L. Restubog, T. J. Zagenczyk, C. Kiewitz and R. L.Tang, In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research on Personality, 44, 2010, pp. 512–519.
[29] S. R. Kessler, A. C. Bandell, P. E. Spector, W. C. Borman, C. E. Nelson and L. M. Penney, Re-examining Machiavelli: A three-dimensional model of Machiavellianism in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2010, pp. 1868–1896..
[30] J. Sutton, P. K. Smith and J. Swettenham, Bullying and ‘theory of mind’: A critique of the ‘social skills deficit’ view of anti-social behavior. Social Development, 8, 1999, pp. 118–127.
[31] B. J. Bushman and R. F. Baumeister, Threatened egoism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1998, pp. 219–229.
[32] K. A. Fanti, P. J. Frick and S. Georgiou, Linking callous-unemotional traits to instrumental and non-instrumental forms of aggression. Journal of Psychopathological Behaviour Assessment, 31, 2009, pp. 285–298.
[33] H. M. Baughman, S. Dearing, E. Giammarco and P. A. Vernon, Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences 52, 2012, pp. 571–575.
[34] E. Baillien and H. De Witte, Why is organizational change related to workplace bullying? Role conflict and job insecurity as mediators. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2009, pp. 348–371.
[35] C. R. Boddy, Corporate Psychopaths, Conflict, Employee Affective Well-Being and Counterproductive Work Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1688-0.
[36] A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 1977, pp. 191–215.
[37] P. Blau, Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley, 1964/1986.
[38] P. E. Spector, S. Fox, L. M. Penney, K. Bruursema, A. Goh and S. Kessler, The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 2006, pp. 446–460.