Performance Based Design of Masonry Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frames for Near-Field Earthquakes Using Energy Methods
Authors: Alok Madan, Arshad K. Hashmi
Abstract:
Performance based design (PBD) is an iterative exercise in which a preliminary trial design of the building structure is selected and if the selected trial design of the building structure does not conform to the desired performance objective, the trial design is revised. In this context, development of a fundamental approach for performance based seismic design of masonry infilled frames with minimum number of trials is an important objective. The paper presents a plastic design procedure based on the energy balance concept for PBD of multi-story multi-bay masonry infilled reinforced concrete (R/C) frames subjected to near-field earthquakes. The proposed energy based plastic design procedure was implemented for trial performance based seismic design of representative masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames with various practically relevant distributions of masonry infill panels over the frame elevation. Non-linear dynamic analyses of the trial PBD of masonry infilled R/C frames was performed under the action of near-field earthquake ground motions. The results of non-linear dynamic analyses demonstrate that the proposed energy method is effective for performance based design of masonry infilled R/C frames under near-field as well as far-field earthquakes.
Keywords: Masonry Infilled Frame, Energy Methods, Near-fault Ground Motions, Pushover Analysis, Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis, Seismic Demand.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1093179
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2795References:
[1] Roberts, M. W., and Lutes, L. D., 2003 "Potential for Structural Failure in the Seismic Near-field.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V.129, No.8, 2003, pp 927-934.
[2] Yang, J. N., and Agrawal, A. K., "Semi-Active Hybrid Control for Nonlinear Buildings against Near-Field Earthquakes.” Engineering Structures, Vol.94, 2002, pp 271-280.
[3] Leelataviwat, S., Goel, S.C., and Stojadinovic, B., "Energy-Based Seismic Design of Structures using Yield Mechanism and Target Drift.” Journal of Structural Engineering, V.128, No.8, 2002, pp 1046-1054.
[4] Housner , G.W., " Limit Design Of Structures To Resist Earthquakes.” Proceeding of 1st world conference on earthquake engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland,California, 5, 1956, pp 1-13.
[5] Kato, B., and Akiyama, H., " Seismic Design of Steel Buildings” Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, V.108, No. 8, 1982, pp1709-1721
[6] Akiyama, H., "Earthquake-Resistant Limit-State Design of Buildings.” University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1985.
[7] Lee, S.S., and Goel, S.C., "Performance Based Design Of Steel Moment Frames Using Target Drift And Yield Mechanism.” Research Report UMCEE 01-17, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2001.
[8] BIS. "IS 1893-2002 (Part 1): Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1-General Provisions and Buildings.” Bureau of Indian Standards, 2002.
[9] Madan, A., Reinhorn, A. M., Mander, J. B., Valles, R., "Modeling of Masonry Infill Panels for Structural Analysis.” Journal of Structural Engineering, V.123, No.10, 1997, pp 1295 - 1302.
[10] Valles, R. E., Reinhorn, A. M., Kunnath, S. K., Li, C., and Madan, A., "IDARC Version 4.0 - A Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of Buildings.” Technical Report NCEER-96-0010, SUNY/Buffalo, 1996.
[11] ATC-40., "Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings.” Report SSC 96-01, California Seismic Safety Commission, Applied Technology Council, CA, USA, 1996.
[12] FEMA-356 "Prestandard and Commentary for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings”, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington D. C., USA, 2000.
[13] Newmark, N.M., and Hall, W.J., "Earthquake Spectra and Design.” Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland,California, 1982.
[14] Housner, G. W., "Behavior of structures during earthquakes.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V.85, No.4, 1959, pp 109-129.