Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30011
The Impact of Rapid Urbanisation on Public Transport Systems in the Gauteng Region of South Africa

Authors: J. Chakwizira, P. Bikam, T. A. Adeboyejo

Abstract:

This paper seeks to illustrate the impact of rapid urbanization (in terms of both increase in people and vehicles) in the Gauteng region (which includes Johannesburg, Pretoria and Ekurhuleni). The impact that existing transport systems and options place on the capacity of residents from low income areas to travel and conduct various socio-economic activities is discussed. The findings are drawn from a 2013 analysis of a random transport household survey of 1550 households carried out in Gauteng province. 91.4% of the study respondents had access to public transport, while 8.6% had no access to public transport. Of the 91.4% who used public transport, the main reason used to explain this state of affairs was that it was affordable (54.3%), convenient (15.9%), Accessible (11.9%), lack of alternatives (6.4%) and reliable at 4.1%. Recommendations advanced revolve around the need to reverse land use and transportation effects of apartheid planning, growing and developing a sustainable critical mass of public transport interventions supported by appropriate transport systems that are environmentally sustainable through proper governance. 38.5% of the respondents indicated that developing compact, smart and integrated urban land spaces was key to reducing travel challenges in the study area. 23.4% indicated that the introduction and upgrading of BRT buses to cover all areas in the study area was a step in the right direction because it has great potential in shifting travel patterns to favor public modes of transport. 15.1% indicated that all open spaces should be developed so that fragmentation of land uses can be addressed. This would help to fight disconnected and fragmented space and trip making challenges in Gauteng. 13.4% indicated that improving the metro rail services was critical since this is a mass mover of commuters. 9.6% of the respondents highlighted that the bus subsidy policy has to be retained in the short to medium term since the spatial mismatches and challenges created by apartheid are yet to be fully reversed.

Keywords: Urbanisation, population, public, transport systems, Gauteng.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1337239

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF

References:


[1] A. May and Marsden S, Urban Transport and Mobility, International Transport Forum, Leipzig, Germany, 2010 pp. 3 & 5
[2] Cortright J. Driven Apart, 2010, Rockfeller Foundation, USA
[3] R. Cervero. "Linking urban transport and land use in developing countries”, The Journal of Transport and Land use, Vol. 6 no. 1, 2013 pp. 7-24
[4] European Commission, "Roadmap to a single European transport area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system”. Technical report, European Commission, European Partnership for Transport, Brussels, 2011.
[5] J. Chakwizira J, M. Mashiri M, The contribution of transport governance in socio-economic development in South Africa, In Sustainable Transport: 28th Annual Southern African Transport Conference (SATC) 2009, Pretoria, South Africa, 6-9 July 2009, pp 1-18 ISBN: 9781920017392
[6] Sustainable Energy Africa, The state of energy in South African cities, Sustainable energy Africa, Cape Town, South Africa, 2006
[7] StatsSA, General Household Survey, Pretoria, 2009 pp. 6
[8] DoT , National Household Transport Surveys, 2003, Pretoria
[9] R. Gakenheimer, Mobility Issues in the Developing World, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 1997 pp. 1
[10] StatsSA, Census 2011, Pretoria, 2011
[11] G.K. Ingram, Patterns of metropolitan development: What we have learnt? World Bank – Operations Evaluation Department (OED), Washington, USA, 1997
[12] P. Alpkokin, C. Cheung, J. Black & Y. Hayashi, 'Dynamics of Clustered Employment Growth and Its Impacts on Commuting Patterns in Rapidly Developing Cities', Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2008 vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 427–444.
[13] N. Buchanan, R. Barnett, S. Kingham & D. Johnston, 'The Effect of Urban Growth on Commuting Patterns in Christchurch, New Zealand', Journal of Transport Geography, 2006 vol. 14, no. 5,pp. 342-354.
[14] R.N. Buliung, & P.S. Kanaroglou, 'Urban Form and Household Activity-Travel Behavior', Growth and Change, 2006 vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 172-199.
[15] Q. Ma, W. Zhang & X. Wang, 'Review on Spatial Structure of The Metropolis Affecting Its Traffic', Economic Geography, 2004 vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 215-220.
[16] Bertaud, A, The Spatial Organization of Cities: Deliberate Outcome or Unforeseen Consequence?, World Development Report 2003: Dynamic Development in a Sustainable World, World Bank.
[17] P. Veneri, 'Urban Polycentricity and the Costs of Commuting: Evidence from Italian Metropolitan Areas', Growth and Change, 2010, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 403–429.
[18] Bertaud, A, Urban Spatial Structures, Mobility and The Environment, 2009, World Bank, Washington DC.
[19] J. Chakwizira, "The Question of Road Traffic congestion and Decongestion in the Greater Johannesburg Region”, in Proceedings of the 26th Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2007), 9-12 July 2007, Pretoria, South Africa, ISBN: 1-920-01702x pages 499 – 511
[20] IBM Corporation. The globalization of traffic congestion: IBM 2010 commuter pain survey. Technical report, 2010, IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York.
[21] DoT, Key results of the national household travel survey, Pretoria, 2005 pp. 8
[22] C. Venter, Quality of Transport in the Priority Townships, October 2013 (unpublished).
[23] J. Pourbaix, Towards a smart future for cities: Urban transport scenarios for 2025. Public Transport International, 2011 vol. 60(3):8–10.
[24] Chakwizira J, Bikam P, Dayomi M & Adeboyejo A. T, "Some missing dimensions of urban public transport in Africa: insights and perspectives from South Africa”, The Built and Human Environment Review, Volume 4, Special Issue, 2, 2011 pages 56 -84