EFL Teachers’ Metacognitive Awareness as a Predictor of Their Professional Success

Authors: Saeedeh Shafiee Nahrkhalaji

Abstract:

Metacognitive knowledge increases EFL students’ ability to be successful learners. Although this relationship has been investigated by a number of scholars, EFL teachers’ explicit awareness of their cognitive knowledge has not been sufficiently explored. The aim of this study was to examine the role of EFL teachers’ metacognitive knowledge in their pedagogical performance. Furthermore, the role played by years of their academic education and teaching experience was also studied. Fifty female EFL teachers were selected. They completed Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) that assessed six components of metacognition including procedural knowledge, declarative knowledge, conditional knowledge, planning, evaluating, and management strategies. Near the end of the academic semester, the students of each class filled in ‘the Language Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire’ to evaluate their teachers’ pedagogical performance. Four elements of MAI, declarative knowledge, planning, evaluating, and management strategies were found to be significantly correlated with EFL teachers’ pedagogical success. Significant correlation was also established between metacognitive knowledge and EFL teachers’ years of academic education and teaching experience. The findings obtained from this research have contributing implication for EFL teacher educators. The discussion concludes by setting out directions for future research.

Keywords: Metacognotive Knowledge, Pedagogical Performance, Language Teacher Characteristics Questionnaire, Metacognitive Awareness Inventory.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1093008

References:

[1] G.G. Duffy, S. Miller, S. Parsons, and M. Meloth, "Teachers as Metacognitive Professionals,” in Handbook of Metacognition , D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A.C. Graesser Eds. Taylor & Francis, 2009, pp. 60-82.
[2] H. Hartman, Metacognition in learning and Instruction. Dordrecht Netherlands: Kluwer, 2001.
[3] J. Richards and C. Lockhart (Eds). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[4] J. H. Flavell, "Metacognitive aspects of problem solving,” in The Nature of Intelligence, L. B. Resnick Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976, pp. 231–235.
[5] J. Flavell, "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry,” American Psychologist, vol. 34, pp. 906–911, 1979.
[6] L. Baker and L. Beall, "Metacognitive processes and reading comprehension” in Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, S. E. Israel and G. G. Duffy Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2009, pp. 373–388.
[7] D. J. Hacker, "Definitions and empirical foundations,” in Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, D. J. Dunlosky and A. C. Graesser Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, pp. 1-23.
[8] A. Zohar, "The nature and development of teachers’ metastrategic knowledge in the context of teaching higher order thinking,” The Journal of Learning Sciences, vol. 15/3, pp. 331–377, 2006.
[9] M. H. Long, "Process and product in ESL program evaluation,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 18/3, pp. 409–25, 1984.
[10] H. A. Rosencranz & B. J. Biddle, "The role approach to teacher competence” in Contemporary Research on Teacher Effectiveness, B. J. Biddle and W. J. Ellena Eds. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964, pp. 232– 63.
[11] B. V. Rosenshine and N. Furst, "The use of direct observation to study teaching,” in Handbook of Research on Teaching, 2nd ed., R. M. W. Travers, Ed. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973, pp. 122–83.
[12] K. A. Acheson & M. D. Gall, "Techniques in the Clinical Supervision of Teachers: Preservice and Inservice Applications,” 4th ed. New York: Longman, 1997.
[13] C. L. Elizabeth, C.M. May, and P.K. Chee, "Building a model to define the concept of teacher success in Hong Kong,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 24, 2008, pp. 623–634.
[14] X. Lin, D. L. Schwartz, and G. Hatano, "Toward teachers’ adaptive metacognition,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 40/4, p.p. 245–255, 2005.
[15] J. Bransford, R. Stevens, D. Schwartz, A. Meltzoff, R. Pea, and J. Roschelle, " Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy” in Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2nd ed., P. A. Alexander and P. H. Winne Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 2006, pp. 209–244.
[16] L. Galda and S. Guice, "Response-based reading instruction in the elementary grades,” in Instructional Models in Reading, S. Stahl and D. Hayes Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997, pp. 311–330.
[17] G. G. Duffy, "Developing metacognitive teachers: Visioning and the expert’s changing role in teacher education and professional development,” in Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development, S. E. Israel, C. C. Block, K. L. Bauserman, and K. Kinnucan-Welsch Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005, pp. 299–314.
[18] X. D. Lin, "Reflective adaptation of a technology artifact: A case study of classroom change,” Cognition & Instruction, vol. 19, pp. 395–440, 2001.
[19] J. W. Little (Chair), M. Lampert, F. Graziani, H. Borko, K. K. Clark, and N. Wong, "Conceptualizing and investigating the practice of facilitation in content-oriented teacher professional development,”
[Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 2007].
[20] C. Balcikanli, "Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for Teachers,” Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, vol. 9/3, pp. 1309-1332, 2011.
[21] G. Schraw and R . Dennison, "Assessing metacognitive awareness,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 19/4, p.p. 460-475, 1994.
[22] F. Moafian and R. Pishghadam, "Construct validation of a questionnaire on characteristics of successful EFL teachers,” Pazhuhesh-e Zabanhe-ye Khareji Journal, vol. 54, pp. 127-142, 2009.