Effects of SRT and HRT on Treatment Performance of MBR and Membrane Fouling

Authors: M. I. Aida Isma, Azni Idris, Rozita Omar, A. R. Putri Razreena

Abstract:

40L of hollow fiber membrane bioreactor with solids retention times (SRT) of 30, 15 and 4 days were setup for treating synthetic wastewater at hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 12, 8 and 4 hours. The objectives of the study were to investigate the effects of SRT and HRT on membrane fouling. A comparative analysis was carried out for physiochemical quality parameters (turbidity, suspended solids, COD, NH₃-N and PO₄^3-). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy diffusive X-ray (EDX) analyzer and particle size distribution (PSD) were used to characterize the membrane fouling properties. The influence of SRT on the quality of effluent, activated sludge quality, and membrane fouling were also correlated. Lower membrane fouling and slower rise in trans-membrane pressure (TMP) were noticed at the longest SRT and HRT of 30d and 12h, respectively. Increasing SRT results in noticeable reduction of dissolved organic matters. The best removal efficiencies of COD, TSS, NH₃-N and PO₄^3- were 93%, 98%, 80% and 30% respectively. The high HRT with shorter SRT induced faster fouling rate. The main fouling resistance was cake layer. The most severe membrane fouling was observed at SRT and HRT of 4 and 12, respectively with thickness cake layer of 17mm as reflected by higher TMP, lower effluent removal and thick sludge cake layer.

 

Keywords: Membrane bioreactor, SRT, HRT, membrane fouling.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1093004

References:

[1] Judd, S., The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors in water and wastewater treatment. London, Oxford, 2006, pp. 2-17.
[2] Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane A.G., Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr Sci. 284, 2006, pp. 17-53.
[3] Chuyang Y. Tang, T. H. Chong, Anthony G. Fane. Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: A review. Advanced in Colloid and interface science 164, 2011, pp. 126 – 143.
[4] Pierre Cote, Zamir Alam, Jeff Penny, Hollow fiber membrane life membrane bioreactors (MBR). Desalination 258, 2012, pp. 145-151.
[5] Sheng Cheng, Application of submerged hollow fiber membrane in membrane bioreactors: filtration principles, operation and membrane fouling. Desalination 283, 2011, pp.31 – 39.
[6] Yu Tian and Xinying Su. Relation between the stability of activated sludge flocs and membrane fouling in MBR: under different SRTs. Bioresource Technology 118, 2012, pp. 477-482.
[7] R. Van den Broeck, P. Krzeminski, J. Van Dierdonck, G. Gins, M. Lousada, J. F. M. Van Impe, J. H. J. M. van der Graaf, I. Y. Smets, J.B. van Lier. Activated sludge characteristics affecting sludge filterability in municipal and industrial MBRs: Unraveling correlations using multi-component regression analysis. Journal of Membrane Science 378, 2011, pp. 330-338.
[8] Sangmin Lee and Mi-Hyung Kim. Fouling characteristics in pure oxygen MBR process according to MLSS concentrations and COD loadings. Journal of Membrane Science 428, 2013, pp. 323-330.
[9] M. Tiranuntakul, P.A. Schneider, V. Jegatheesan. Assessments of critical flux in a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor. Biosource technology 102, 2011, pp. 5370-5374.
[10] Lutz Bohm, Anja Drews, Helmut Prieske, Pierre Berube, Matthias Kraume. The importance of fluid dynamics for MBR fouling mitigation. Bioresource Technology 122, 2012, pp. 50 – 61.
[11] Vera Iversen, Hasan Koseoglu, Nevzat O. Yigit, Anja Drews, Mehmet Kitis, Boris Lesjean, Mathias Kraume. Impacts of membrane flux enhancers on activated sludge respiration and nutrient removal in MBRs. Water research 43, 2009, pp. 822-830.
[12] Muhammad R. Bilad, Gergo Mezohegyi, Priscilla Declerck, Ivo F.J. Vankelecom. Novel magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) for fouling control in membrane bioreactors. Water research 46, 2012, pp. 63-72.
[13] T. Zsirai, P. Buzatu, P. Aerts, S. Judd. Efficacy of relaxation, back flushing, chemical cleaning and clogging removal for an immersed hollow fibre membrane bioreactor. Water research 46, 2012, pp. 4499 – 4507.
[14] Xu Li, Jinsong Yu, A.G. Agwu Nnanna. Fouling mitigation for hollow fiber UF membrane by sonication. Desalination 281, 2011, pp. 23 – 29.
[15] Rajesh Banu J., Do Hac-Uan and Ick-Tae Yeom. Nutrient removal in an A2/O-MBR reactor with sludge recycling. Biosource Technology 100, 2009, pp. 3820-3824.
[16] APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/ Water Environment Federation, Washington, 2005.
[17] Mark D. Williams and Massoud Pirbazari. Membrane bioreactor process for removing biodegradable organic matter from water. Water Research 41, 2007, pp. 3880 – 3893.
[18] Min Gu Kim and George Nakhla. Comparative studies on membrane fouling between two membrane-based biological nutrient removal systems. J.Membr Sci., 2009, pp. 91-99.
[19] J.Zhang, H.C.Chua, J.Zhou, A.G.Fane. Factors affecting the membrane performance in submerged membrane bioreactors. J. Membr. Sci. 284, 2006, pp. 54-66.
[20] Winzeler, H.B., Belfort G. Enhanced performance for pressure driven membrane processes: the argument for fluid instabilities. J. Membr. Sci. 80, 1993, pp. 35-47.