Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31100
User-Perceived Quality Factors for Certification Model of Web-Based System

Authors: Jamaiah H. Yahaya, Aziz Deraman, Abdul Razak Hamdan, Yusmadi Yah Jusoh


One of the most essential issues in software products is to maintain it relevancy to the dynamics of the user’s requirements and expectation. Many studies have been carried out in quality aspect of software products to overcome these problems. Previous software quality assessment models and metrics have been introduced with strengths and limitations. In order to enhance the assurance and buoyancy of the software products, certification models have been introduced and developed. From our previous experiences in certification exercises and case studies collaborating with several agencies in Malaysia, the requirements for user based software certification approach is identified and demanded. The emergence of social network applications, the new development approach such as agile method and other varieties of software in the market have led to the domination of users over the software. As software become more accessible to the public through internet applications, users are becoming more critical in the quality of the services provided by the software. There are several categories of users in web-based systems with different interests and perspectives. The classifications and metrics are identified through brain storming approach with includes researchers, users and experts in this area. The new paradigm in software quality assessment is the main focus in our research. This paper discusses the classifications of users in web-based software system assessment and their associated factors and metrics for quality measurement. The quality model is derived based on IEEE structure and FCM model. The developments are beneficial and valuable to overcome the constraints and improve the application of software certification model in future.

Keywords: web-based system, software certification model, user centric approach, software quality factors, metrics and measurements

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1852


[1] Deraman, A. & Yahaya, J.H. 2012, Research and Development in Software Certification: Past, Present and Future (Keynote), Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Applied Mathematics 2012, Jakarta, Indonesia, 6 Sept 2012, pp. 1-7.
[2] Deraman, A. 2011, Software Certification: The way forward (keynote), The 5thMalasyian Software Engineering Conference (MySec2011), Johor Bharu, 13-14 Dec 2011.
[3] Ropponen, J. &Lyytinen, K. 2000. "Components of Software Development Risk: How to Address Them? A Project Manager Survey,” IEEE Trans. Software Engineering 26(2), pp. 98-112.
[4] Berntsson-Svensson, R. & Aurum, A. 2006. "Successful Projects and Products: An Empirical Investigation” ACM Proceeding of ISESE'06, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 21 - 22 September, 2006, pp. 144-153.
[5] Yahaya, J.H., Deraman, A &Hamdan, A.R. 2008, SCfM_Prod: A software product certification model”, 3rd International Conference on information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications, ICTTA, 2008, art 4530350.
[6] Yahaya, J.H., Deraman, A. &Hamdan, A.R. 2010, Continuously ensuring quality through software product certification: A case study. 2010 International Conference on Information Society, i-society 2010, London. Art No. 6018821, pp. 183-188.
[7] Sommerville, I. 2007, Software Engineering 8, England: Pearson Education Limited, pp. 516-656.
[8] Patton, J. "Understanding User Centricity”, IEEE Software, Volume 24, No. 6, pp. 9-11, November/December 2007.
[9] Voas, J. 1998, The Software Quality Certification Triangle. Crosstalk, The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, November 1998:12-14.
[10] Rawashdeh, A. & Matalkah, B. 2006, A New Software Quality Model for Evaluating COTS Components, Journal of Computer Science 2 (4): 373-381, ISSN 1549-3636.
[11] Yahaya, J.&Deraman, A. 2010. Measuring the Unmeasurable Characteristics of Software Product Quality. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology (IJACT). Vol.2 (4), pp 95-106.
[12] Panovski, G. 2008, Master’s thesis Product Software Quality, Department of Mathematics and Computing Science, Eindhoven University of Technology.
[13] Hwang, S.M. 2009, Process Quality Levels of ISO/IEC 15504, CMMI and K-model, International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, Volume 3, No. 1, pp. 33-42, January.
[14] DeepshikhaJamwal, 2010. Analysis of Software Quality Models for Organizations International Journal of Latest Trends in Computing (E-ISSN: 2045-5364), pp. 19-23.
[15] Quasthoff, M. &Meinel, C. 2007, User Centricity in Healthcare Infrastructures, Internet Technologies and Systems HassoPlattner Institute, Germany, pp. 141-151.
[16] Khaled M Khan, Mohammed Samaka, Christopher Van Eeno & Surianto Budihardjo. 2010. Assessing User-Centric Quality of Web-Based System. Int. Journal of Software Engineering, IJSE vol. 3, No. 1 January 2010.pp 13-27.
[17] ISO 9126, 2014. ISO 9126 Software Quality Characteristics. (accessed 11 Feb 2014).
[18] Florac, W.A. 1996. Software Quality Measurement: A Framework for Counting Problems and Defects. Technical Report CMU/SEI-92-TR-022 ESC-TR-92-022 Sept 1992.
[19] Johnson, M. 2010. User Involvement, Social Media, and Service Evolution: The Case of Habbo. In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences – 2010,
[20] Johnson, M. 2013. M. How Social Media Changes User-Centred Design: Cumulative and Strategic User Involvement with Respect to Developer–User Social Distance, Aalto University publication series, DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS 46/2013.
[21] Yahaya, et al., 2008, Software Certification Implementation: Case Studies Analysis and Findings, The 3rd International Symposium on Information Technology 2008 (ITSim2008), Kuala Lumpur, Volume 3, pp. 1541-1548, 26-29 August 2008.
[22] Spantzel, A.B., Camenish, J., Gross, T. & Sommer, D. 2007, User Centricity: A Taxonomy and Open Issues, Department of Computer Science, Purdue University,IBM Zurich Research Lab, Switzerland.
[23] Kim, J. & Park, Y. 2011, Two Directions of User-centric Approach to Identifying New Service Opportunities: Vacuum to Solution and Practice to Niche, 3rd International Conference on Information and Financial Engineering IPEDR, Volume.12, pp. 487-491.
[24] Ahn, G.J. et al., 2009, Privacy-enhanced User-Centric Identity Management, IEEE Communications Society (IEEE ICC) proceedings.
[25] Deraman, A., Hamdan, A.R., Yahaya, J.H, Baharom, F, & Hood, Z. 2010, Software Certification Process by Product Quality Approach: The Process Manual, Kuala Terengganu: PenerbitUniversiti Malaysia Terengganu.
[26] Heck, P., Klabbers, M. &Eekelen, M. v.2010, A Software Product Certification Model, Software Qual J (2010) 18:37–55.
[27] J. McCall, P. Richards, G. Walters, "Factors in Software Quality”, in N. Fenton & S Pfleegers (Ed), Software Metrics: A rigorous Approach, 2nd edition, Boston, PWS Publishing Company, 1977.
[28] IEEE. 2005. IEEE Standard for a Software Quality Metrics Methodology. arnumber=749159 (accessed 4 Feb 2014)