Determination of Some Agricultural Characters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes
Authors: Ercan Ceyhan, Ali Kahraman, Hasan Dalgıç
Abstract:
This research was made during the 2011 and 2012 growing periods in the trial filed of "Research Station for Management of Soil Water and Desertification" according to “Randomized Blocks Design” with 3 replications. Research material was the following chickpea genotype; CA119, CA128, CA149, CA150, CA222, CA250, CA254 and other 2 commercial varieties named as Gökçe and Yaşa. Some agronomical characteristics such as plant height (cm), number of pod per plant, number of seed per pod, number of seed per plant, 1000 seed weight (g) and seed yield (kg ha-1) were determined. Statistically significant variations were found amongst the genotypes for all variables except seeds per pod. Means of the two years showed the range for plant height was from 52.83cm (Gökçe) to 73.00cm (CA150), number of pod per plant was from 14.00 (CA149) to 26.83 (CA261), number of seed per pod was from 1.10 (Gökçe) to 1.19 (CA149 and CA250), number of seed per plant was from 16.28 (CA149) to 31.65 (CA261), 1000 seed weight was from 295.85g (CA149) to 437.80g (CA261) and seed yield was from 1342.73 kg ha-1 (CA261) to 2161.50 kg ha-1 (CA128). Results of the research implicated that the new developed lines were superior compared with the control (commercial) varieties by means of most of the characteristics.
Keywords: Agricultural characters, chickpea, seed yield.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1090552
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1940References:
[1] M. Viswanathan, A. Ramachandran, P. Indira, C. Snehalatha, V. Mohan and P.K. Kymal, "Responses to Legumes in NIDDM Subjects-Lower Plasma-Glucose and Higher Insulin Levels", Nutrition Reports International, 40: 803–812, 1989.
[2] L. Hangen and M.R. Bennink, Consumption of Black Beans And Navy Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) Reduced Azoxymethane-Induced Colon Cancer in Rats. Nutrition and Cancer, 44(1): 60–65, 2002.
[3] M. Harmankaya, M.M. Özcan, S. Karadaş and E. Ceyhan, "Protein And Mineral Contents of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes Grown in Central Anatolian Region of Turkey", South Western Journal of Horticulture, Biology and Environment, 1(2): 159 - 165, 2010.
[4] Anonymous, 2012. http://faostat.fao.org
[5] B.T. Biçer and A.E. Anlarsal, "Bazı Nohut (Cicer arietinum L) Köy Çeşitlerinde Bitkisel ve Tarımsal Özelliklerin Belirlenmesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi,10 (4), 389-396, 2004.
[6] E. Öztaş, B. Bucak, V. Al and A. Kahraman, "Farklı Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) Çeşitlerinin Harran Ovası Koşullarında Kışa Dayanıklılık, Verim ve Diğer Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi” Hr.Ü.Z.F.Dergisi, 11 (3/4):81- 85, 2007.
[7] E. Ceyhan, M. Onder, M. Harmankaya, M. Hamurcu, and S. Gezgin, "Response of Chickpea Cultivars to Application of Boron in Boron – Deficient Calcareous Soils”, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 38:17, 2381-2399, 2007.
[8] A. Bakaoğlu and M. Ayçiçeği, "Bingöl Ekolojik Koşullarında Bazı Nohut (Cicer arietinum L) Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Verim Öğeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, F. Ü. Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 17 (1), 107-113, 2002.
[9] E. Ceyhan, M. Önder, A. Kahraman, R. Topak, M.K. Ateş, S. Karadas and M.A. Avcı, "Effects of Drought on Yield and Some Yield Components of Chickpea”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66: 378-382 (2012).
[10] P.N. Bahl, D.P. Raju, J. Kumar, and S.S. Yadav, "Pusa 267 A New High Yielding Kabulu Gram”, Plant Breeding Abstracts, 61(7): 862p, 1991.
[11] R.P.S. Pundir and C.K. Rajagophan, "Collection of Chickpea Germplazm in Timil Nadu”, India Plant Breeding Abstracts, (58): 391, 1988.
[12] D. Eser, H.H. Geçit, H.Y. Emeklier, O. Kavuncu, "Nohut Gen Materyalinin Zenginleştirilmesi ve Değerlendirilmesi", TÜBİTAK Tarım ve Ormancılık Dergisi, 13(2): 246-254, 1989.
[13] M. Altınbaş and H. Sepetoğlu, "Yeni Geliştirilen Nohut Hatlarının Bornova Koşullarında Verim ve Bazı Tarımsal Özellikleri Üzerinde Araştırmalar”, Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg, 38 (2-3):39-46, 2001.
[14] A.E. Anlarsal, C. Yücel and D. Özveren, "Çukurova Koşullarında Bazı Nohut Hatlarının Verim ve Verimle İlgili Özelliklerinin Saptanması Üzerine Bir Araştırma", Türkiye 3. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 15-20 Kasım, Adana, Cilt III, 342-347, 1999.
[15] M. Altinbaş, B. Tanyolaç and H. Sepetoğlu, "Kışlık Nohutta Verim Performansı ve Tane İriliği İle İlişkisi", Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1-2-3), 38-80, 1999.
[16] E. Öztaş, B. Bucak, V. Al and A. Kahraman, "Farklı Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) Çeşitlerinin Harran Ovası Koşullarında Kışa Dayanıklılık, Verim ve Diğer Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi” Hr.Ü.Z.F.Dergisi, 11 (3/4):81- 85, 2007.
[17] L. Leport, N.C. Turner, S.L. Davies and K.H.M. Siddique, "Variation in Pod Production and abortion Among Chickpea Cultivars under Terminal Drought”, Europ. J. Agronomy, 24: 236–246, 2006.
[18] C. Toker and M.İ. Çağırgan, "Assessment of Response to Drought Stress of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Lines under Rainfed Conditions”, Tr. J of Agriculture and Forestry, 22(6):615-621, 1998.
[19] H. Kulaz and V. Çiftçi, "Van Koşullarında Bitki Sıklığının Nohut (Cicer arietinumL)’ta Verim ve Verim Öğelerine Etkisi", Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry, (23): 599-601, 1999.