Planning and Design Criteria to Make Urban Transport More Sustainable: The Case of Baku

Authors: Gülnar Bayramoğlu Barman

Abstract:

Since the industrial revolution, technological developments and increased population have caused environmental damages. To protect the nature and architectural environment, firstly, green architecture, ecological architecture and then sustainability occurred. This term has been proposed not to be a new term but a response to environmental disturbances caused by human activities and it is re-conceptualization of architecture. Sustainable architecture or sustainability is lot more extensive than ecological and green architecture. It contains the imbalance between environmental problems that is natural environment and consumption that occurred all around the world. An important part of sustainability debate focused on urban planning and design for more sustainable forms and patterns. In particular, it is discussed that planning and design of urban areas have a major effect on transport and therefore can help reduce car usage, emissions, global warming and climate change. There are many planning and design approaches and movement that introduce certain criteria and strategies to prevent car dependency and encourage people to use public transportation and walking. However, when review the literature, it is seen that planning movements, such as New Urbanism and Transit Oriented Development originated and were implemented mostly in West European and North American Cities. The purpose of this study is to find out whether all those criteria, principles and strategies are also relevant planning approaches for more non-western cities like Baku, which has a very different planning background and therefore possibly different urban form and transport issues. In order to answer the abovementioned question, planning and design approaches in the literature and these recent planning movements were studied and a check list was formed which indicate planning and design approaches that can help attain a more sustainable transport outcome. The checklist was then applied to the case of Baku.

Keywords: Sustainability, Transport, Urban Design.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1336250

References:

[1] Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability And Cities; Overcoming Automobile Dependence. W. -K. Chen, Linear Networks and Systems (Book style). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1993, pp. 123–135.
[2] Our Common Future (1987, March 20). Brundtland Report United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development.
[3] Robert, K. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005, April). What Is Sustainable Development? Science And Policy For Sustainable Development, 47, Pp. 8-21.
[4] Schafer, A. (1998). The Global Demand For Motorized Mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 32 (6), 455-477.
[5] World Energy Council, 2007.
[6] Litman, T. (2011, March 1). Measuring Transportation; Traffic, Mobility and Accessibility.
[7] Strategic Transportation Plan (2010). WSP Finland Ltd In Association With KLC Law Firm. Republic Of Azerbaijan: Consulting Services for the Preparation of a Strategic Transportation.
[8] Fatullayev, Ş. S. (1986). Baku Urban Planning Between 19th and the Beginning of the 20th Century.
[9] Efendizade, R. M. (1986). Architecture of the Soviet Azerbaijan.
[10] Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2006). Urban Design To Reduce Automobile Dependence. An International Journal Of Suburban And Metropolitan Studies , 2, 35-52.
[11] Banister, D. (2008). The sustainability mobility paradigm. Transport Policy.