Learning Styles Difference in Difficulties of Generating Idea
Authors: M. H. Yee, J. Md Yunos, W. Othman, R. Hassan, T. K. Tee, M. M. Mohamad
Abstract:
The generation of an idea that goes through several phases is affected by individual factors, interests, preferences and motivation. The purpose of this research was to analyze the difference in difficulties of generating ideas according to individual learning styles. A total of 375 technical students from four technical universities in Malaysia were randomly selected as samples. The Kolb Learning Styles Inventory and a set of developed questionnaires were used in this research. The results showed that the most dominant learning style among technical students is Doer. A total of 319 (85.1%) technical students faced difficulties in solving individual assignments. Most of the problem faced by technical students is the difficulty of generating ideas for solving individual assignments. There was no significant difference in difficulties of generating ideas according to students’ learning styles. Therefore, students need to learn higher order thinking skills enabling students to generate ideas and consequently complete assignments.
Keywords: Difference, difficulties, generating idea, learning styles.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1336210
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2056References:
[1] B. Jonson, "Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age,” Design Studies, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 613–624, 2005.
[2] D. Graham, and T. Bachmann, Ideation: The Birth and Death of Ideas. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2004, pp. 4.
[3] American Heritage Dictionary, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Ed. USA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2011.
[4] J. Foster, How to Get Ideas, San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers, 1996.
[5] B. S. Glassman, Improving Idea Generation and Idea Management in order to Better Manage the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation, West Lafayette Indiana: Purdue University, PhD Dissertation, 2009.
[6] B. Vandenbosch, A. Saatcioglu, and S. Fay, "Idea management: a systemic view,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 259-288, 2006.
[7] M. A. Abd Hamid, Pengenalan Pemikiran Kritis & Kreatif, 1st Ed. Skudai, Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2001.
[8] B.K. Beyer, Practical Strategies for the Teaching of Thinking, London: Allyn and Bacon, Inc, 1992.
[9] B. Mohamad, A. Esa, and H. Junoh, Psikologi Pendidikan Dalam PTV, Johor: Penerbit UTHM, 2008.
[10] M. H. Yee, M. Y. Jailani, T. K. Tee, O, Widad, M. Mimi Mohaffyza and H. Razali, "Contributing factors towards difficulty in generating idea among technical students," Journal of Technical Education and Training (JTET), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14-27, June 2013,
[11] Sharp, A. Teaching Fluency in Gifted Classrooms: Generating Ideas is an Important Part of Creative Problem Solving. Retrieved Mar 25, 2013, from http://gifted-classes-materials-lessons.suite101.com/article.cfm/ teaching_fluency_in_gifted_classrooms#ixzz0pFkVb76K.
[12] J. Hoseinifar, M. M. Siedkalan, S. R. Zirak, M. Nowrozi, A. Shaker, E. Meamar, E. Ghaderi, "An investigation of the relation between creativity and five factors of personality in students,” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 30, pp.2037-2041, 2011.
[13] K. J. Wheelihan, Creativity for Success. The Creativity Institute. Retrieved 2011 from http://EzineArticles.com/
[14] G. D. Kuh, "Assessing what really matters to student learning: inside the national survey of student engagement,” The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 131-137, 2001.
[15] M. Y. Jailani, M. H. Yee, A. Arihasnida., O. Widad, H. Razali, and T. K. Tee, "Penjanaan idea berdasarkan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi bagi mata pelajaran pendidikan kejuruteraan,” in Proc. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Kejuruteraan Dan Keusahawanan 2010 (NCEE 2010), Kota Bahru, Kelantan, 2010, pp. 80-89.
[16] C. J. Lassig, "Approaches to creativity: How adolescents engage in the creative process,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 10, pp. 3-12, December 2013.
[17] M. H. Yee, T. K. Tee, M. Y. Jailani, O. Noraini, and I. Suzanna, "The perception of student on mastering the level of higher order thinking skills in technical education subjects,” in Proc. 3rd regional Conference On Engineering Education and research In Higher Education (RCEERHED 2010a), Kuching, Sarawak, Jun 2010, pp. 30-35.
[18] M. H. Yee, M. Y. Jailani, O. Widad, H. Razali, and T. K. Tee, "Persepsi tahap kesukaran penjanaan idea bagi subjek pendidikan kejuruteraan,” in Prosiding International Conference on Education 2010 (ICE 2010), Brunei Darrussalam, 2010, pp. 24-27.
[19] V. E. Ross, "A model of inventive ideation,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 120-129, November 2006.
[20] A. Furnham, D. J. Hughes, E. Marshall, "Creativity, OCD, Narcissism and the Big Five,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 10, pp. 91-98, December 2013.
[21] A. L. Chen, L. P. Li, X. S. Li, Z. Jun, and D. Lei, "Study on innovation capability of college students based on extenics and theory of creativity,” Procedia Computer Sciences, vol. 17, pp. 1194-1201, 2013.
[22] R. W. Woodman, J. E. Sawyer, and R. W. Griffin, "Toward a theory of organizational creativity,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 18, pp. 293–321, 1993.
[23] D. A. Kolb, Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual, Boston, Mass: McBer & Co, 1976.
[24] W. Wiersma, Research Methods In Education: An Introduction. 7th Ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2005.
[25] D. Ary, L. C. Jacobs, and A. Razaviech, Introduction to Research in Education, 6th Ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2002.
[26] R. V. Krejecie, & D. W. Morgan, "Determining Sample Size for Research Activities,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 30, no. 3, 1970, pp. 607-610.
[27] N. Idris, Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan, Malaysia: Mc Draw Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd, 2010, pp. 117.
[28] Y. P. Chua, Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan Buku 1. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd, 2006.
[29] J. R. McDonough, and J. Osterbrink, "Learning styles: an issue in clinical education,” AANA Journal, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 89-94, 2005.
[30] R. Loo, "Kolb’s learning styles and learning preferences. Is there a linkage?” Educational Psychology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 146-153, 2004.