Disparity of Learning Styles and Cognitive Abilities in Vocational Education

Authors: Mimi Mohaffyza Mohamad, Yee Mei Heong, Nurfirdawati Muhammad Hanafi Tee Tze Kiong

Abstract:

This study is conducted to investigate the disparity of between learning styles and cognitive abilities specifically in Vocational Education.  Felder and Silverman Learning Styles Model (FSLSM) was applied to measure the students’ learning styles while the content in Building Construction Subject consists; knowledge, skills and problem solving were taken into account in constructing the elements of cognitive abilities. Building Construction is one of the vocational courses offered in Vocational Education structure. There are four dimension of learning styles proposed by Felder and Silverman intended to capture student learning preferences with regards to processing either active or reflective, perception based on sensing or intuitive, input of information used visual or verbal and understanding information represent with sequential or global learner. Felder-Solomon Learning Styles Index was developed based on FSLSM and the questions were used to identify what type of student learning preferences. The index consists 44 item-questions characterize for learning styles dimension in FSLSM. The achievement test was developed to determine the students’ cognitive abilities. The quantitative data was analyzed in descriptive and inferential statistic involving Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). The study discovered students are tending to be visual learners and each type of learner having significant difference whereas cognitive abilities there are different finding for each type of learners in knowledge, skills and problem solving. This study concludes the gap between type of learner and the cognitive abilities in few illustrations and it explained how the connecting made. The finding may help teachers to facilitate students more effectively and to boost the student’s cognitive abilities.

Keywords: Learning Styles, Cognitive Abilities, Dimension of Learning Styles, Learning Preferences.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1336140

References:

[1] Ruth G. Thomas (1992), Cognitive Theory-Based Teaching and Learning in Vocational Education. University of Minnesota; Thesis Dissertation.
[2] Tee Tze Kiong, Jailani Md Yunos, Baharom Mohamad, Widad Othman and Yee Mei Hong (2009) Pengintegrasian Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Menerusi Peta Minda Bagi Matapelajaran Kemahiran Hidup. University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia; Proceeding; pp 114-121.
[3] Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, Longmans.
[4] Bloom, B.S (Ed) (1989), Taksonomi Objektif Pendidikan. Buku Pedoman 1: Domain Kognitif. Terjemahan Abdullah Junus. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
[5] Muhammad A.Yinusa and Akanle O.Basil (2008), Socio Economic Factors Influencing Students Academic Performance in Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences 5 (4): pp 319-323.
[6] Martins Fabumi, Peter Brai-Abu and Isaiah Adeyinka Adenji (2007), Class Factors as Determinants of Secondary School Student’s Academic Performance in Oyo State. Journal of Social Science 14 (30: pp 243-247.
[7] Azizi Hj. Yahaya, Yusof Boon, Shahrin Hashim, Wan Zuraidah Wan Hamid (2003), Kajian Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Akademik PelajarTingkatan Empat Sekolah Menengah Teknik Negeri Sembilan. (Kertaskerja Negeri Sembilan. (Paper presented in Seminar Memperkasakan Sistem Pendidikan, 19-21 Oktober 2003.
[8] Francis, A. A and Segun, M. O (2008), Student, Teacher and School Environment Factor as Determinations of Achievement in Senior Secondary School Chemistry in Oyo State Nigeria.The Journal Of International Social Research Volume 1/2 Winter. pp 13-34.
[9] Felder, R. M (1993), Reaching the second tier- Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. Journal of College Science Teaching. 23 (5), pp 286-290.
[10] Creswell, J.W (2005), Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
[11] Felder, R.M and Soloman B. A (1997), Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. Retrieved 31 July 2010 from http:www.engr.ncsu.edu/ learningstyles/ilsweb.html.
[12] Sabine, G., Silvia, R. V., Tommaso, L. (2007), In-depth analysis of Felder-Silverman learning styles dimensions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), pp 79-93.
[13] Thomas F. H., Amit, J.S., (2007), Using learning styles instruments to enhance student learning. Journal of Innovative Education, 5,1. pp 249- 252.
[14] Felder, R. Silverman L.K.(1988), Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Journal in Engineering Education, 78 (7), pp 674-681.
[15] Nancy L. L, Karen C. Band George A. M (2005), SPSS for Intermidiate Statistics: Use and Interpretation 2nd Edition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[16] Anderson, L. W and Krathwohl, D. R. (2001), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s.
[17] Garon and Cano (1996). Cooperating Learning in Agriculture Education. The Journal of International Social Research Volume 1/2 Fall. pp 13-34.
[18] Cano, J., and Martinez, C. (1991) The Relationship Between Cognitive Performance And Critical Thinking Abilities among Selected Agricultural Education Students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 32(1), pp 24-29.