New Echocardiographic Morphofunctional Diastolic Index (MFDI) in Differentiation of Normal Left Ventricular Filling from Pseudonormal and Restrictive
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
New Echocardiographic Morphofunctional Diastolic Index (MFDI) in Differentiation of Normal Left Ventricular Filling from Pseudonormal and Restrictive

Authors: N. Nelasov, D. Safonov, M. Babaev, E. Mirzojan, O. Eroshenko, M. Morgunov, A. Erofeeva

Abstract:

We have shown previously that reflected high intensity motion signals (RIMS) can be used for detection of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD). It is also well known, that left atrial (LA) dimension can be used as a marker of DD. In this study we decided to analyze the diagnostic role of new echocardiographic morphofunctional diastolic index (MFDI) in differentiation of normal filling of LV from pseudonormal and restrictive. MFDI includes LA dimension and velocity of early diastolic component ea of RIMS (MFDI = LA/ea).  

343 healthy subjects and patients with various cardiac pathology underwent dopplerechocardiographic exam. According to the criteria of "Don" classification scheme 155 subjects had signs of normal LV filling (N) and 55 - of pseudonormal and restrictive filling (PN + R). LA dimension was performed in standard manner. RIMS were registered by conventional pulsed wave Doppler from apical 4-chamber view, when the sample volume was positioned between the tips of mitral leaflets. The velocity of early diastolic component of RIMS was measured. After calculation of MFDI mean values of this index in two groups (N and PN + R) were compared. The cutoff value of MFDI for differentiation of patients with N and PN + R was determined.

Mean value of MFDI in subjects with normal filling was 1.38+0.33 and in patients with pseudonormal and restrictive filling 2.43+0.43; p<0.0001. The cutoff value of MFDI > 2.0 separated subjects with normal LV filling from subjects with pseudonormal and restrictive filling with sensitivity 89.1% and specificity 97.4%.

Keywords: Dopplerechocardiography, diastolic dysfunction, left atrium, reflected high intensity motion signals.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1089479

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1544

References:


[1] N. Nelassov, "Reflected high-intensity motion signals: can this ultrasound phenomenon be used for assessment of left ventricular function?,” Ultraschall Med., 2004., V. 25., # 6 , pp. 422 – 427.
[2] М. Nagaplev, N. Nelasov, "Reproducibility of Еа component of reflected high intensity motion signals (RIMS),” The 24th international Congress of Radiology, 2006, - Capetown, South Africa, p. 491.
[3] N. Nelassov, A. Kastanajan, K. Sariev, "Does age influence systolic component of spectral Doppler artifacts,” Journal of the Indian Academy of Echocardiography, 2002, V. 7, # 1, p. 242.
[4] Nelassov N., Kastanajan A., Mironov S., Eroshenko O. "Variation of spectral Doppler artifacts with age,” Eur J Heart failure, 2002, Suppl., V.1, # 1, p.36.
[5] N.J. Nelassov, A. Shishkina, N. Korotkiyan, M. Nagalev, et al. "Early diastolic ea component of reflected high-intensity motion signals (RIMS) in differentiation of normal and pseudonormal left ventricular filling,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, August 2011, Vol. 37, Issue 8, Supplement, Page S31.
[6] N. Nelassov, E. Mirzayan, T. Karkoshko, E. Ponomarenko, et al. "Conventional pulsed wave Doppler in assessment of left and right ventricular systolic and diastolic function,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, May 2013, Vol. 39, Issue 5, Supplement, Page S29.
[7] N. Nelassov, A. Kastanajan, S. Mironov, A. Hurdaev "Echo-Doppler exam. Can spectral artifacts be utilized for assessment of left ventricular systolic function?,” European J Heart Failu,, 2001, V. 3 (Suppl 2), S 37.
[8] N. Nelassov, A. Kastanajan, E. Shanina. E. Makarenko, R. Adinarajana, V. Pronin, "Doppler artifacts: useless phenomenon or source of important information,” European J Echocardiogr., 2000, V. 1 (Suppl 2), S 77.
[9] N. Nelassov, A. Kastanajan, O. Eroshenko, M. Morgunov, "Evaluation of validity of new classification scheme of diastolic dysfunction,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, May 2006, Vol. 32, Issue 5, Supplement, Page P167.
[10] H. Yamada, P. Goh, J. Sun, J. Odabashian, M. Garscia, J. Thomas, A. Klein, "Prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction by Doppler echocardiography: Canadian consensus guidelines,” J Am Soc Echocardiogr., 2002, V. 15, # 10, pp. 1238 - 1244.
[11] J. S. Gottdiener, D. W. Kitzman, G. P. Aurigemma et al., "Left atrial volume, geometry and function in systolic and diastolic heart failure of persons ≥ 65 years of age (The Cardiovascular Health Study),” Am J Cardiol., 2006, V. 97, pp. 83 – 89.
[12] N. Nelassov, A. Кastanajan, N. Drobotja, S. Zatonsky, "Assessment of efficacy of new classification scheme for detection of different degrees of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction ,"Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux, 2005, Tome 98, Special III, p. 59.
[13] T. A. Lasko, J. G. Bhagwat, K. H. Zou and L. Ohno-Machado, "The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2005, V. 38, # 5, pp. 404 – 415.
[14] J. M. Bland, D. G. Altman, "Statistical methods for assessment agreement between two methods of clinical measurements,” Lancet, 1986, V. 8, # 8476, pp. 307 – 310.
[15] C. P. Appleton, L. K. Hatle, R. L. Popp, "Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left entricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study,” J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988, v. 12, pp. 426-40.
[16] H. Takatsuji, T. Mikami, K. Urasawa, Teranishi J, H. Onozuka et al., "A new approach for evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: Spatial and temporal analysis of left ventricular filling flow propagation by color M-mode Doppler echocardiography,” J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996, V. 27, pp. 365-71.
[17] A. D. Waggoner, S. M. Bierig, "Tissue Doppler imaging: A useful echocardiographic method for the cardiac sonographrer to assess systolic and diastolic left ventricular function,” J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2001, V. 14, pp. 1143-52.
[18] M. Kasner, D. Westermann, P. Steendijk, R. Gaub, "Utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of diastolic function in heart failure with normal ejection fraction: a comparative Doppler-conductance catheterization study,” Circulation, 2007, V. 11, pp. 637-47.
[19] C. Rivas-Gotz, D. S. Khoury, M. Manolios, L. Rao et al., "Time interval between onset of mitral inflow and onset of early diastolic velocity by tissue Doppler: a novel index of left ventricular relaxation: experimental studies and clinical application,” J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003, V. 42, pp. 1463-70
[20] J. Wang, D. S. Khoury, V. Thohan, G. Torre-Amione, S. F. Nagueh, "Global diastolic strain rate for the assessment of left ventricular relaxation and filling pressures,” Circulation, 2007, V. 115, pp.1376-83.
[21] S. Arques, E. Roux, P. Sbragia et al., " Comparative accuracy of color M-mode and tissue Doppler echocardiography in the emergency diagnosis of congestive heart failure in chronic hypertensive patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction,” Am J Cardiol, 2005, V. 96, pp. 1456–1459.
[22] W. J. Paulus, C. Tschöpe, J. E. Sanderson et al, "How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology,” Eur Heart J, 2007, V. 28, # 20, pp. 2539 - 2550.