Service-Oriented Enterprise Architecture (SoEA) Adoption and Maturity Measurement Model: A Systematic Literature Review
Authors: Nur Azaliah Abu Bakar, Harihodin Selamat, Mohd Nazri Kama
Abstract:
This article provides a systematic review of existing research related to the Service-oriented Enterprise Architecture (SoEA) adoption and maturity measurement model. The review’s main goals are to support research; to facilitate other researchers’ search for relevant studies; and to propose areas for future studies within this area. In addition, this article provides useful information on SoEA adoption issues and its related maturity model, based on research-based knowledge. The review results suggest that motives, critical success factors (CSFs), implementation status, and benefits are the most frequently studied areas, and that each of these areas would benefit from further exposure.
Keywords: Systematic Literature Review, Service-oriented Architecture, Adoption, Maturity Model.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1089303
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2950References:
[1] L. Bastida, A. Berreteaga, and I. Cañadas, "Adopting Service Oriented Architectures Made Simple,” Enterprise Interoperability III, pp. 221–232, 2008.
[2] T. Erl, M. L. Taub, K. Hart, J. Mcfarland, and T. Young, SOA Design Patterns, 1st ed. Boston, USA: Prentice Hall, 2009.
[3] E. Niemi and S. Pekkola, "Enterprise Architecture Quality Attributes: A Case Study,” 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3878–3887, Jan. 2013.
[4] M. K. Haki and M. W. Forte, "Proposal of a service oriented architecture governance model to serve as a practical framework for business-IT Alignment,” in New Trends in Information Science and Service Science (NISS), 2010 4th International Conference on, 2010, pp. 410–417.
[5] S. Gerić and N. Vrček, "Prerequisites for successful implementation of Service-Oriented Architecture,” in Proceedings of the ITI 2009 (ITI’09) 31st International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, 2009, pp. 175–180.
[6] J. H. Lee, H.-J. Shim, and K. K. Kim, "Critical Success Factors in SOA Implementation: An Exploratory Study,” Information Systems Management, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 123–145, Apr. 2010.
[7] M. A. Manan and P. Hyland, "Enterprise SOA Implementation Readiness: a Case Study in Malaysia,” in 22nd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 2011.
[8] G. Feuerlicht and S. Govardhan, "SOA: Trends and Directions,” Systems Integration, vol. 149, pp. 149–155, 2009.
[9] C. Abrams and R. W. Schulte, "Service-oriented architecture overview and guide to SOA research,” G00154463, Stamford: Gartner Research, no. January, 2008.
[10] R. Heffner, "SOA Adoption: Technology Diversity Accelerators,” Forrester Research, 2008.
[11] G. A. Lewis, "Is SOA Being Pushed Beyond Its Limits ?,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2013.
[12] C. Okoli and K. Schabram, "A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research,” vol. 10, no. 2010. pp. 1–49, 2010.
[13] B. Kitchenham and S. Charters, "Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Version 2.3,” UK, 2007.
[14] M. Petticrew and H. Roberts, Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
[15] J. W. Creswell, Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 4/e ed. Pearson, 2012, p. 672.
[16] C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, P. A. da MotaSilveiraNeto, E. Engström, I. do Carmo Machado, E. S. de Almeida, P. A. da M. S. Neto, E. Engström, I. do C. Machado, and E. S. de Almeida, "On the Reliability of Mapping Studies in Software Engineering,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 2594–2610.