Flame Acceleration of Premixed Natural Gas/Air Explosion in Closed Pipe

Authors: H. Mat Kiah, Rafiziana M. Kasmani, Norazana Ibrahim, Roshafima R. Ali, Aziatul N.Sadikin

Abstract:

An experimental study has been done to investigate the flame acceleration in a closed pipe. A horizontal steel pipe, 2m long and 0.1m in diameter (L/D of 20), was used in this work. For tests with 90 degree bends, the bend had a radius of 0.1m and thus, the pipe was lengthened 1m (based on the centreline length of the segment). Ignition was affected at one end of the vessel while the other end was closed. Only stoichiometric concentration (Ф, = 1.0) of natural gas/air mixtures will be reported in this paper. It was demonstrated that bend pipe configuration gave three times higher in maximum overpressure (5.5 bars) compared to straight pipe (2.0 bars). From the results, the highest flame speed, of 63ms^-1, was observed in a gas explosion with bent pipe; greater by a factor of ~3 as compared with straight pipe (23ms^-1). This occurs because bending acts similar to an obstacle, in which this mechanism can induce more turbulence, initiating combustion in an unburned pocket at the corner region and causing a high mass burning rate, which increases the flame speed.

Keywords: Bending, gas explosion, bending, flame acceleration, overpressure.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1089287

References:

[1] M. Fairweather, Hargrave, G. K., Ibrahim, S. S. and Walker, D. G., Studies of Premixed Flame Propagation in Explosion Tubes. Combust Flame, 116 (4), 1999, pp. 504-518.
[2] S.S. Ibrahim and Masri, A. R., The effects of obstructions on overpressure resulting from premixed flame deflagration. J Loss Prevent Proc, 14(3), 2001, pp. 213-221.
[3] A. Lipatnikov and Chomiak, J., Turbulent burning velocity and speed of developing, curved, and strained flames. P Combust Inst,29(2), 2002, pp. 2113-2121.
[4] R. Blanchard, Arndt, D., Grätz, R., Poli, M. and Scheider, S., Explosions in closed pipes containing baffles and 90 degree bends,J Loss Prevent Proc,23(2),2010, pp. 253-259
[5] H.N. Phylaktou, Andrews, G. E. and Herath, P., Fast flame speeds and rates of pressure rise in the initial period of gas explosions in large L/D cylindrical enclosures, J Loss Prevent Proc, 3,1990,pp. 355-364
[6] K. Chatrathi K, Going J E, and Grandestaff B. Flame propagation in industrial scale piping, Process Saf. Prog, 20, 2001, pp. 286-294
[7] G.I. Oakley and Thomas, G.O., Investigations into concerns about BS EN 12874:2001 flame arresters, Performance requirements, test methods and limits for use, HSE Research Report 281, 2004.
[8] EN 12874, European Standard, Flame arresters-Performance requirements, test methods and limits for use, 2001.
[9] M.A. Nettleton, Shock attenuation in a gradual area explosion, J Fluid Mech, 60, 1973, pp. 209-223.
[10] R.M. Kasmani, Andrews, G.E. and Phylaktou, H.N., Experimental study on vented gas explosion in a cylindrical vessel with a vent duct, Process Saf Environ, 91 (4), 2013, pp. 245-332
[11] D. Razus, Movileanu, C., Brinzea, V. and Oancea, D., Explosion pressures of hydrocarbon-air mixtures in closed vessels. J Hazard Mater, 135(1-3), 2006, pp. 58-65.
[12] A.E. Dahoe and Goey, L. P. H., On the determination of the laminar burning velocity from closed vessel gas explosions. J Loss Prevent Proc, 16(6), 2003, pp. 457-478.
[13] J. Kindracki, Kobiera, A., Rarata, G. and Wolanski, P. (2007). Influence of ignition position and obstacles on explosion development in methane-air mixture in closed vessels. J Loss Prevent Proc, 20(4-6), 2007, pp. 551-561.
[14] Q. Zhang, Li, W., Lin, D. C., Duan, Y. and Liang, H. M., Experimental study of gas deflagration temperature distribution and its measurement. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 35, 2011, pp.503-508.
[15] G. Munday, Detonations in vessels and pipelines, The Chemical Engineer, 1971, pp.135-144.