Robust Human Rights Governance: Developing International Criteria

Authors: Helen P. Greatrex

Abstract:

Many states are now committed to implementing international human rights standards domestically. In terms of practical governance, how might effectiveness be measured? A facevalue answer can be found in domestic laws and institutions relating to human rights. However, this article provides two further tools to help states assess their status on the spectrum of robust to fragile human rights governance. The first recognises that each state has its own 'human rights history' and the ideal end stage is robust human rights governance, and the second is developing criteria to assess robustness. Although a New Zealand case study is used to illustrate these tools, the widespread adoption of human rights standards by many states inevitably means that the issues are relevant to other countries. This is even though there will always be varying degrees of similarity-difference in constitutional background and developed or emerging human rights systems.

Keywords: robust human rights governance, fragile states.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1073569

References:

[1] Bradford and G. Scott, Developing Robust Economic Governance Systems: A Project for the World Bank MDTF for Research and Knowledge Work on Fragile States. Final Report - Volume 1: Main Report. Washington DC: The World Bank, 2009.
[2] Department for International Development, Why Do We Need to Work More Effectively in Fragile States? London, UK: DFID, 2005.
[3] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Fragile States: Policy Commitment and Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States and Situations. Paris, France: OECD, 2007.
[4] Human Rights Commission, New Zealand Action Plan for Human Rights 2005-2010. Wellington, NZ: HRC, 2005.
[5] Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, New Zealand Handbook on International Human Rights. Wellington, NZ: MFAT, 2008, p.12.
[6] United Nations General Assembly, Human Rights Council: National Report Submitted in Accordance with Paragraph 15 (A) of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 - New Zealand (A/HRC/WG.6/5/NZL/1) 9 April 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: UN, 2009, p. 4.
[7] United Nations Economic and Social Council, Report of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and Follow-up to the World Conference on Human Rights (E.CN.4/2003/14) (UN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003), p. 403.
[8] Ministry of Justice, Re-evaluation of the Human Rights Protections in New Zealand: Report for the Associate Minister of Justice and Attorney- General Hon. Margaret Wilson. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Justice, 2000.