Role of Credit on Production Efficiency of Farming Sector in Pakistan(A Data Envelopment Analysis)

Authors: Saima Ayaz, Zakir Hussain, Maqbool Hussain Sial

Abstract:

The study identified the sources of production inefficiency of the farming sector in district Faisalabad in the Punjab province of Pakistan. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique was utilized at farm level survey data of 300 farmers for the year 2009. The overall mean efficiency score was 0.78 indicating 22 percent inefficiency of the sample farmers. Computed efficiency scores were then regressed on farm specific variables using Tobit regression analysis. Farming experience, education, access to farming credit, herd size and number of cultivation practices showed constructive and significant effect on the farmer-s technical efficiency.

Keywords: Agricultural credit, DEA, Technical efficiency, Tobit analysis

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1329436

References:

[1] Adams, D. W. & Delbert A. F. (1992). Edited by Informal Finance in Low-income Countries, Westview Press, Colorado, 1992
[2] Aleem, I., (1990). Imperfect information, screening, and the costs of informal lending: A study of rural credit market in Pakistan. World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), 329-349.
[3] Bravo-Ureta, B. E. & Pinheiro. A. E., (1997). Technical, economic and allocative efficiency in peasant farming: Evidence from the Dominican Republic. The Developing Economies, 35, 48-67.
[4] Coelli T. D. S., Rao P. & Battese, G. E. (1998). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Boston MA: Kluwar Academic Publishers
[5] David, C. & Mayer, L. R. (1980). Measuring the farm level impact of agricultural loans, in borrowers and lenders: rural financial Markets and Institutions in Developing Countries. London: Overseas Development Institute, 201-234.
[6] Farrell, M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (A, general), 120, 253-281.
[7] Feder, G., Lawrence J., Lau, J., Lin, Y., & Luo, X., (1990). The relationship between credit and productivity in Chinese agriculture: A microeconomic model equilibrium. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(5), 1151-1157.
[8] GOP (2008) Economic Survey of Pakistan, Government of Pakistan, Finance Division, Islamabad.
[9] Hanif, M., Khan, S. & Nauman, F., (2004). Agricultural perspective and policy. ISBN 969-8581-06-5 Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock (MINFAL), Islamabad.
[10] Iqbal, M., Ahmad, M. & Abbas, K. (2003). The impact of institutional credit on agricultural production in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 42 (4), 469-485.
[11] Lovell, C. A. K. (1993). Production frontier and productive efficiency. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Oxford University Press, New York, 3-67.
[12] Malik, S. J. (1999). Poverty and rural credit: the case of Pakistan. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics Islamabad.
[13] Meeusen, W. and Broeck, J. V. (1977). Efficiency estimation from cobbdouglas production functions with composed errors. International Economic Review, 18, 435-444.
[14] Ogen, O. (2007). The agricultural sector and Nigeria-s development: comparative perspectives from the Brazilian agro industrial economy, 1960-1995. Nebula Journal Australia, 4(1), 184-194.
[15] Olagunju, F.I. & Adeyemo, R. (2007). Agricultural credit and production efficiency of small-scale farmers in south-eastern Nigeria. Agricultural Journal 2(3), 426-433.
[16] Qureshi, S. K & Shah, A. (1992). A critical review of rural credit policy in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 31(4), 781-801.
[17] Ray, S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: theory and techniques for economics and operations research. The University of Cambridge Press, U K.
[18] Sial, H. M. & Carter, M. R. (1996). Financial market efficiency in an agrarian economy: micro econometric analysis of the Pakistan Punjab. The Journal of Development Studies, 32(5), 771-798.
[19] Zuberi, H. A. (1989). Production function, Institutional credit and agricultural development in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 28(1), 43-56.