Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32131
Functionality of Negotiation Agent on Value-based Design Decision

Authors: Arazi Idrus, Christiono Utomo


This paper presents functionality of negotiation agent on value-based design decision. The functionality is based on the characteristics of the system and goal specification. A Prometheus Design Tool model was used for developing the system. Group functionality will be the attribute for negotiation agents, which comprises a coordinator agent and decision- maker agent. The results of the testing of the system to a building system selection on valuebased decision environment are also presented.

Keywords: Functionality, negotiation agent, value-baseddecision

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1272


[1] Anumba, C.J., Egbu, C. and Carrillo, P. (2005). Knowledge Management in Construction. Blackwell Publishing.
[2] Sense, A.J. (2008). The Conditioning of Project Participant-s Authority to Learn Within Project. International Journal of Project Management 26 (2): 105-111.
[3] Anumba, C.J., Ugwu, O.O. and Ren, Z. (2005). Agents & Multi-agent System in Construction. Taylor and Francis.
[4] Hamel, A; Suzanne, P; Michael, P. (2005). ÔÇÿA New Approach to Agency in a Collaborative Decision Making Process-. In Proceeding International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE Computer Society.
[5] Kirk, S.J., Turk, R. G. and Hobbs, R. W. (2007). Value Based Team Design Decision Making. The American Institute of Architects.
[6] Thomas, G., and Thomas, M. (2005) Constructing Partnering and Integrated Team Working. Blackwell Publishing.
[7] Kelly, J., Male, S. and Graham, D. (2004). Value Management of Construction Project. Blackwell Science.
[8] Clemen, R.T. (1996). Making Hard Decisions, 2nd edition. Duxbury Press, Belmont.
[9] Cariaga, I., El-Diraby, T. and Osman, H. (2007). Integrating Value Analysis and Quality Function Deployment for Evaluating Design Alternatives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 133(10), 761-770.
[10] Sanchez, M., Prats, F., Agell, N. and Ormazabal, G. (2005). Multiplecriteria Evaluation for Value Management in Civil Engineering. Journal of Management in Engineering 21(3), 131-137.
[11] Fan, S., Shen, Q. and Lin, G. (2007). Comparative Study of Idea Generation between Traditional VM Workshop and GDSS-supported Workshop. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 133(10), 816-825.
[12] Al-Hammad and Hassanain. VE in the assessment of exterior building wall system. Journal of Architectural Engineering 2 (3), 1996.
[13] Qingan, M., Qing, M, and Hong, Y. (1999) Value Analysis Application in Material Design of Concrete. SAVE International Conference Proceeding.
[14] Fisher, J. M. (1999). The Modification of Value Engineering for Application in the Petrochemical Industry. Master thesis, University of Calgary, Alberta
[15] Scott, M.J. (1999). Formalizing Negotiation in Engineering Design. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology Pasadena.
[16] Wanyama, T. (2006). Decision Support for COTS Selection. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calgary.
[17] Zhang (2002). Sophisticated Negotiation in Multi-Agent Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
[18] Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J. and Slotkin, G. (1995). Multi-agent Negotiation Under Time Constrains-. Artificial Intelligence 75, 297-345.
[19] Morge, M. and Beaune, P. (2004). A Negotiation Support System Based on Multi-agent System: Specify&Preference Relation on Arguments. ACM Symposium on Applied Computing.
[20] Henderson-Sellers, B. and Giorgini, P. (Eds.) (2005). Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Idea Group Publishing.
[21] Al-Hashel, E., Balachandran, B.M.., Sharma, D. (2007). A Comparison of Three Agent-Oriented Software Development Methodologies: ROADMAP, Prometheus, and MaSE. in B. Apolloni et al. (Eds.): KES 2007/ WIRN 2007, Part III. LNAI 4694, pp. 909-916. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[22] Padgham, L. and Winikoff, M. (2004). Developing Intelligent Agent System a Practical Guide. John Wiley&Sons, New Jersey.
[23] Utomo, C., Idrus, A., Napiah, M. and Khamidi, M.F. (2009). Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation. International Conference on Operations Research. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (WASET). Penang Malaysia, February 25- 27: 447-451.