Performance Comparison for AODV, DSR and DSDV W.R.T. CBR and TCP in Large Networks
Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) is a wireless ad hoc self-configuring network of mobile routers (and associated hosts) connected by wireless links, the union of which forms an arbitrary topology, cause of the random mobility of the nodes. In this paper, an attempt has been made to compare these three protocols DSDV, AODV and DSR on the performance basis under different traffic protocols namely CBR and TCP in a large network. The simulation tool is NS2, the scenarios are made to see the effect of pause times. The results presented in this paper clearly indicate that the different protocols behave differently under different pause times. Also, the results show the main characteristics of different traffic protocols operating on MANETs and thus select the best protocol on each scenario.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1072379Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1427
 S. Palchaudhuri and S. Lavu. A Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Net-work Routing Protocols, Computer Sc., Electrical Engg. Rice University.
 S. Sarkar, T. Basavaraju, and C. Puttamadappa. Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks Principles, Protocols, andApplications, 2007
 S. Basagni, M. Conti, S. Giordano, and I. Stojmenovic. Mobile Ad hoc Networking, 2004, IEEE press , A JOHN WILEY and SONS, INC. PUBLICATION.
 M. Ilyas. THE Handbook of AD HOC Wireless Networks, Edited by CRC Press, 2003.
 C. Perkins and P. Bhagwat. Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector rout-ing (DSDV) for mobile computers, In Proceedings of the SIGCOMM '94 Conference on Communication Architectures, Protocols and Applications, pages 234-244, August 1994.
 D. Johnson Y. Hu and D. Maltz. The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4, 2007, RFC 4728.
 C. Perkins, E. Royer and S. Das. Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, RFC3561.
 K. Fall, K. Varadhan The ns Manual (formerly ns Notes and Documen-tation), The VINT Project, A Collaboration between researchers at UC Berkeley, LBL, USC/ISI, and Xerox PARC, January 6, 2009.
 C. Perkins and E. Royer. Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing, Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 90-100, February 1999.
 The VINT Project. The network simulator - ns-2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.
 T. Camp, J. Boleng and V. Davies. Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research, Dept. of Math. and Computer Sciences Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO in 10 September 2002.
 A. Aho, B. Kernighan and P. Weinberger. AWK-A Pattern Scanning and Processing Language, in UNIX Programmer's Manual, Sev enth Edition, Volume 2, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston 1983, pp. 451-459.
 D. Close, A. Robbins, P. Rubin, R. Stallman and P. Oostrum. The AWK Manual" Edition 1.0, December 1995
 C. Perkins, E. Royer, S. Das and M. Marina. Performance Comparison of Two On-Demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks, IEEE Personal Communications, February 2001.
 LST at ETH Zrich. http://www.lst.infethz.ch/research/adhoc/fastns/, LST at ETH Zrich, 2006.
 A. Kumar,L. Reddy and P. Hiremath. Performance Comparison of Wire-less Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocols, IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL.8 No.6, June 2008.
 A. Etorban, P. King and P. Trinder. A Performance Comparison of MDSDV with AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols, School of Mathemati¬cal and Computer Sciences (MACS) Heriot Watt University at Edinburgh UK 2002.
 A. Rahman, Z. Zukarnain. Performance Comparison of AODV, DSDV and I-DSDV Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, European Journal of Scientific Research, ISSN 1450-216X Vol.31 No.4, 2009.
 S. Shah, A. Khandre, M. Shirole and G. Bhole. Performance Evaluation of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols Using NS2 Simulation. Mobile and Pervasive Computing (CoMPC), August 07-08, 2008.
 G. Jayakumar and G. Gopinath Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks based on Random Way Point Mobility Model. American Journal of Applied Sciences 5 (6): 659¬664, 2008.