Analysing the Elementary Science and Technology Coursebook and Student Workbook in Terms of Constructivism

Authors: Nil Duban

Abstract:

The curriculum of the primary school science course was redesigned on the basis of constructivism in 2005-2006 academic years, in Turkey. In this context, the name of this course has been changed as “Science and Technology"; and both content and course books, students workbooks for this course have been redesigned in light of constructivism. The aim of this study is to determine whether the Science and Technology course books and student work books for primary school 5th grade are appropriate for the constructivism by evaluating them in terms of the fundamental principles of constructivism. In this study, out of qualitative research methods, documentation technique (i.e. document analysis) is applied; while selecting samples, criterion-sampling is used out of purposeful sampling techniques. When the Science and Technology course book and workbook for the 5th grade in primary education are examined, it is seen that both books complete each other in certain areas. Consequently, it can be claimed that in spite of some inadequate and missing points in the course book and workbook of the primary school Science and Technology course for the 5th grade students, these books are attempted to be designed in terms of the principles of constructivism. To overcome the inadequacies in the books, it can be suggested to redesign them. In addition to them, not to ignore the technology dimension of the course, the activities that encourage the students to prepare projects using technology cycle should be included.

Keywords: Constructivism, coursebooks, science and technology education.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1071304

References:

[1] ─░. E., Ayd─▒n. "Yap─▒c─▒ Gör├╝┼ƒe Göre Ders Kitaplar─▒n─▒n Tasar─▒m─▒: A├ûF Uzaktan E─ƒitim Ders Kitaplar─▒ ├ûrne─ƒi," Yay─▒nlanmam─▒┼ƒ Y├╝ksek Lisans Tezi. Eski┼ƒehir: Anadolu ├£niversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstit├╝s├╝, 2002.
[2] R. C. Bogdan, and S.K Biklen. Qualitative Research For Education. An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Third Edition. MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1998.
[3] A. Colburn. Constructivism and Science Teaching. Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 1998.
[4] M. Kirk, C.E. Matthews and S. Kurtts. "The Trouble with Textbooks," The Science Teacher. vol. 68, no. 9, 2001.
[5] F. Köseo─ƒlu, B. Atasoy, N. Kavak, H. Akku┼ƒ, E.Budak, H. T├╝may, H. Kaday─▒f├º─▒ and U. Ta┼ƒdelen. ├û─ƒretmenlere-├û─ƒrencilere-Velilere Yap─▒land─▒r─▒c─▒ ├û─ƒrenme Ortam─▒ ─░├ºin Bir Fen Ders Kitab─▒ Nas─▒l Olmal─▒. Ankara: Asil Yay─▒n Da─ƒ─▒t─▒m, 2003.
[6] M. D. LeCompte and J..P. Goetz. Etnographic Data Collection in Evaluation Research. Etnography in Educational Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984.
[7] M.B. Miles and A.M. Huberman. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd Edition). CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
[8] K. Roth. Reading Science Texts For Conceptual Change, In Science Learning: Processes and Applications. Newark, Del.: International Reading Assocations, 1991.
[9] A. Saban. Öğrenme Öğretme Süreci. Yeni Teori ve Yaklaşımlar. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 2002.
[10] R. Yager. "The Constructivist Learning Model: Towards Real Reform in Science Education," The Science Teacher. vol. 58, no. 6, 1991.
[11] ┼×. Ya┼ƒar and M. G├╝ltekin. "Uzaktan E─ƒitimde Kullan─▒lan Ders Kitaplar─▒n─▒n Yap─▒land─▒rmac─▒ ├û─ƒrenmeyi Ger├ºekle┼ƒtirecek Bi├ºimde D├╝zenlenmesi," Uluslararas─▒ Kat─▒l─▒ml─▒ A├º─▒k ve Uzaktan E─ƒitim Sempozyumunda sunulmu┼ƒ bildiri. 23-25 May─▒s, 2002.