Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30174
The Effect of Cooperation Teaching Method on Learning of Students in Primary Schools
Abstract:The effect of teaching method on learning assistance Dunn Review .The study, to compare the effects of collaboration on teaching mathematics learning courses, including writing, science, experimental girl students by other methods of teaching basic first paid and the amount of learning students methods have been trained to cooperate with other students with other traditional methods have been trained to compare. The survey on 100 students in Tehran that using random sampling ┬¼ cluster of girl students between the first primary selections was performed. Considering the topic of semi-experimental research methods used to practice the necessary information by questionnaire, examination questions by the researcher, in collaboration with teachers and view authority in this field and related courses that teach these must have been collected. Research samples to test and control groups were divided. Experimental group and control group collaboration using traditional methods of mathematics courses, including writing and experimental sciences were trained. Research results using statistical methods T is obtained in two independent groups show that, through training assistance will lead to positive results and student learning in comparison with traditional methods, will increase also led to collaboration methods increase skills to solve math lesson practice, better understanding and increased skill level of students in practical lessons such as science and has been writing.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1070787Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1275
 Alice, Susan and colleagues, Rastegar, T. Malekan, M. (2007). Introduction Cooperative learning. Published straw, Tehran.
 Shabani, H. (1999). skills, education, Samt publication.
 Mehrmohammdi, M. (1995) new patterns of teaching and creativity, Journal issues, education, no. IV.
 Keramati, M. (2003). Look at new and different approach to cooperative learning, training regulations, Mashhad.
 Johnson. D.W., Johnson. R.T. & Smith. K.A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college, what evidence is there that it works.
 Aghazadeh,M. (2007). guide new methods of teaching, Tehran: Publication Aeezh.
 Sarkar Arani, MR. (2001) Japan Education, Publishing and the International Scientific Cooperation Office.
 Hamedikhah, A. (1998). Evaluation of teachers using active teaching methods comparing the results of their academic performance in elementary science teaching Tehran, MSc thesis.
 Rauf, A. (1999) teaches to teach, Amir Kabir Publications, Tehran.
 Afkari, S, (2002). Review the effectiveness of aid projects in the academic achievement of high school three areas of the city of Kermanshah MA thesis, History and Philosophy of Education, Islamic Azad University of Arak.
 Jafar-zadeh, H.K. (1995) to evaluate the efficacy of cooperation in the education area, school geography university master's thesis.
 Tahmasebi, A. (1999). through collaboration learning model for teaching complex scientific school of Persian Literature Persian Language and Literature Education, Ministry of Education, Office of education in Kurdistan province.
 GhaniFar, H. (1995). The usefulness of passive and active methods of education, master's thesis.
 Sedgh poor, S. (2008). Establishing control and strategic guidance for youth groups, community education, master's thesis.
 Rahbarnezhad, Y. (2001), Evaluation of Curriculum Test Elementary Persian II base, research and planning organization textbooks.
 Gilaks, M. Mary R. (2007). Cooperative learning in mathematics education, thirty-fifth Mathematics Conferences.