Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30379
On the Dynamic Model of Service Innovation in Manufacturing Industry

Authors: Yongyoon Suh, Chulhyun Kim, Moon-soo Kim

Abstract:

As the trend of manufacturing is being dominated depending on services, products and processes are more and more related with sophisticated services. Thus, this research starts with the discussion about integration of the product, process, and service in the innovation process. In particular, this paper sets out some foundations for a theory of service innovation in the field of manufacturing, and proposes the dynamic model of service innovation related to product and process. Two dynamic models of service innovation are suggested to investigate major tendencies and dynamic variations during the innovation cycle: co-innovation and sequential innovation. To structure dynamic models of product, process, and service innovation, the innovation stages in which two models are mainly achieved are identified. The research would encourage manufacturers to formulate strategy and planning for service development with product and process.

Keywords: Service Innovation, Manufacturing ─░ndustry, dynamic model, service innovation models, innovation cycle

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1327658

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1566

References:


[1] E. Sundin, M. Lindahl, A. Ronnback, G. Sandstrom, and J. Ostlin, "Integrated product and service engineering methodology," Proc. of 11th Int. Conf. of Sus. Inno., Chicago, IL, 2006.
[2] S. Brax, "A manufacturer becoming service provider: challenges and a pradox," Manag. Serv. Qual., vol. 15, no.2, pp.142-155, 2005.
[3] Y. Ahn, S. Lee, and Y. Park, "Development of an integrated product-service roadmaps with QFD: a case study on mobile communications," Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag., vol. 19, no. 5, pp.621-638, 2008.
[4] S. Lenfle and C. Midler, "The launch of innovative product-related services: lessons from automotive telematics," Res. Policy., vol. 38, no. 1, pp.156-169, 2009.
[5] S. Vandermerwe and J. Rada, "Servitization of business," Eur. Manag. J., vol.6, no. 4, pp.314-324, 1988.
[6] K. Jansson and K. D. Thoben, "The extended products paradigm: an introduction," Proc. the 5th Int. Conf. on Des. Info. Infra. Syst. Manufact., Osaka, Japan, 2002.
[7] M. J. Goedkoop, C. J. G. van Halen, H. R.M. te Riele, and P. J. M. Rommens, Product Service Systems, Ecological and Economic Basis, Technical Report, Pre Consultants, The Hague, 1999.
[8] J. M. Utterback and W. J. Abernathy, "A dynamic model of process and product innovation," Omega-Int. J. Manage. S., vol. 3, no. 6, pp.639-656, 1975.
[9] R. Barras, "Towards a theory of innovation in services," Res. Policy., vol. 15, no. 4, pp.161-173, 1986.
[10] F. Gallouj and O. Weinstein, "Innovation in services," Res. Policy., vol. 26, no 4-5. pp.537-556, 1997.
[11] G. Sirilli and R. Evangelista, "Technological innovation in services and manufacturing: results from Italian surveys," Res. Policy., vol. 27, no 9. pp.881-899, 1998.
[12] A. Oke, "Innovation types and innovaiton management practices in servcie companies," Int. J. Oper. Prod. Man., vol. 27, no. 6, pp.564-587, 2007.
[13] E. Kirner, S. Kinkel, and A. Jaeger, "Innovation paths and the innovatin performance of low-technology firms: an empirical analysis of German industry," Res. Policy., vol. 38, no. 3, pp.447-458, 2009.
[14] C. Castaldi, "The relative weight of manufacturing and services in Europe: an innovation perspective," Technol. Forecast. Soc., vol. 76, no. 6, pp.709-722, 2009.
[15] H. Kim and Y. Park, "The impact of R&D collaboration on innovative performance in Korea: a Bayesian network approach," Scientometrics., vol. 75, no. 3, pp.535-554, 2008.
[16] S. Lee, G. Park, B. Yoon, and J. Park, "Open innovation in SMEs: an intermediated network model," Res. Policy., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 290-300, 2010.
[17] B. Y. Eom and K. Lee, "Determinants of industry-academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: the case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization," Res. Policy., vol. 39, no. 5, pp.625-639, 2010.