Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30309
Comparative Analysis of Diversity and Similarity Indices with Special Relevance to Vegetations around Sewage Drains

Authors: Ekta Singh

Abstract:

Indices summarizing community structure are used to evaluate fundamental community ecology, species interaction, biogeographical factors, and environmental stress. Some of these indices are insensitive to gross community changes induced by contaminants of pollution. Diversity indices and similarity indices are reviewed considering their ecological application, both theoretical and practical. For some useful indices, empirical equations are given to calculate the expected maximum value of the indices to which the observed values can be related at any combination of sample sizes at the experimental sites. This paper examines the effects of sample size and diversity on the expected values of diversity indices and similarity indices, using various formulae. It has been shown that all indices are strongly affected by sample size and diversity. In some indices, this influence is greater than the others and an attempt has been made to deal with these influences.

Keywords: diversity indices, Biogeographical factors, Ecology and Similarity Indices

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1070201

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2539

References:


[1] Mc Arthur, R.H., 1965, "Patterns of species diversity," Biological Review, 40: 510-533.
[2] Lewis, J.K., 1970, "Production in grassland ecosystem U.S./I.B.P. Grassland Ecosystem: A supplement Edited by R.L. Dix and R.C. Beidleman," Colorado State University, U.S.A.
[3] Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaner, 1964, "The Mathematical Theory of communication" The Uni. of Illinois press, Urbana, IL.
[4] Menhinick, E.F., 1964, "A comparison of some species diversity indices applied to samples of field insects," Ecology, 45: 858-862.
[5] Mc Intosh, R.P., 1967, "The continum concept of vegetation," Bot. Rev., 33: 130-187.
[6] Margalef, R., 1968, Perspective in Ecological Theory," Uni. of Chicago Press. pp.112.
[7] Simpson, E.H., 1949, "Measurement of diversity," Nature, 163-188.
[8] Lydy M.J., C.G. Crawford, and J.W. Frey, 2000, "A comparison of selected diversity, similarity, and biotic indices for detecting changes in benthic-invertebrate community structure and stream quality," Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 39 (4) 469-479.
[9] H.G. Washington, 1984, "Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: A review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems," Water Research, vol.18, pp 653-694.
[10] R.D. Routledge, 1979, "Diversity indices: Which ones are admissible?" J. Theoretical Biology, vol. 76, pp. 503-515.
[11] Sari Pitkanen, 1998, "The use of diversity indices to assess the diversity of vegetation in managed boreal forests," Forest Ecology and Management, vol.112, pp. 121-137.
[12] Henk Wolda, 1981, "Similarity Indices, Sample Size and Diversity," OecoIogia, vol.50: 296-302.
[13] Pielou, E.C., 1969, "An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology," John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[14] Sorensen, T., 1948, "A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant society based similarity of species content," K. Danske. Videns. Selsk. 5: 1-34.