Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30172
Attributions by Team Members for Team Outcomes in Finnish Working Life

Authors: Maarit Valo, Pertti Hurme

Abstract:

This study focuses on teamwork in Finnish working life. Through a wide cross-section of teams the study examines the causes to which team members attribute the outcomes of their teams. Qualitative data was collected from 314 respondents. They wrote 616 stories to describe memorable experiences of success and failure in teamwork. The stories revealed 1930 explanations. The findings indicate that both favorable and unfavorable team outcomes are perceived as being caused by the characteristics of team members, relationships between members, team communication, team structure, team goals, team leadership, and external forces. The types represent different attribution levels in the context of organizational teamwork.

Keywords: Team, teamwork, team outcomes, workplace, working life.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1070107

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 958

References:


[1] Vašková, R., 2007. Team work and high performance work organisation. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Available at http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/reports/TN0507TR01/TN0507T R01_2.htm (accessed April 14, 2010).
[2] Lehto, A.-M., 2004. Finnish quality of work life surveys. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Available at http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/surveys/FI0410SR01/FI0410SR0 1.htm (accessed April 14, 2010).
[3] European Working Conditions Survey, 2005. Fourth European Working Conditions Survey. European Working Conditions Observatory (EWCO). Available at http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/surveys/ewcs2005/index.htm (accessed April 14, 2010).
[4] Lehto, A.-M., 2009. Changes in the quality of working life over four decades. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Available at www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/surveyreports/FI0911019D/FI0911019 D_2.htm (accessed April 14, 2010).
[5] Frey, L. R., 2003. ÔÇÿIntroduction: Group communication in context: Studying bona fide groups- in Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups, 2nd edn. L. R. Frey (ed.), 1-20. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[6] Gouran, D. S., 1999. ÔÇÿCommunication in groups: The emergence and evolution of a field of study- in The handbook of group communication theory and research. L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, and M. S. Poole (eds), 3- 36. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[7] Poole, M. S., A. B. Hollingshead, J. McGrath, R. Moreland, and J. Rohrbaugh, 2005. ÔÇÿInterdisciplinary perspectives on small groups- in Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives. M. S. Poole and A. B. Hollingshead (eds), 1-20. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[8] Wittenbaum, G. M., A. B. Hollingshead, P. B. Paulus, R. Y. Hirokawa, D. G. Ancona, R. S. Peterson, K. A. Jehn, and K. Yoon, 2004. ÔÇÿThe functional perspective as a lens for understanding groups-. Small Group Research 35/1: 17-43.
[9] Cohen, S. G., and D. E. Bailey, 1997. ÔÇÿWhat makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite-. Journal of Management 23/3: 239-290.
[10] Lemieux-Charles, L., and W. L. McGuire, 2006. ÔÇÿWhat do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature-. Medical Care Research and Review 63/3: 263-300.
[11] Barge, J. K., and R.Y. Hirokawa, 1989. ÔÇÿTowards a communication competency model of leadership-. Small Group Research 20/2: 167-189.
[12] Hollingshead, A. B., G. C. Jacobsohn, and S. J. Beck, 2007. ÔÇÿMotives and goals in context: A strategic analysis of information-sharing groups- in Social communication. K. Fiedler (ed.), 257-280. New York: Psychology Press.
[13] Larson, C., and F. LaFasto, 1989. TeamWork: What must go right / what can go wrong. London: Sage.
[14] Stasser, G., L. A. Taylor, and C. Hanna, 1989. ÔÇÿInformation sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups-. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57/1: 67-78.
[15] De Dreu, C. K., 2007. ÔÇÿCooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective-. Journal of Applied Psychology 92/3: 628-638.
[16] Kang, H.-R., H.-D. Yang, and C. Rowley, 2006. ÔÇÿFactors in team effectiveness: Cognitive and demographic similarities of software development team members-. Human Relations 59/12: 1681-1710.
[17] Lim, B. C., and K. J. Klein, 2006. ÔÇÿTeam mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy-. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 27: 403-418.
[18] Chou, L.-F., A.-C. Wang, T.-Y. Wang, M.-P. Huang, B.-S. Cheng, 2008. ÔÇÿShared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness-. Human Relations 61/12: 1713-1742.
[19] Oetzel, J. G., and K. Bolton-Oetzel, 1997. ÔÇÿExploring the relationship between self-construal and dimensions of group effectiveness-. Management Communication Quarterly 10/3: 289-316.
[20] Gevers, J. M. P., and M. A. G. Peeters, 2008. ÔÇÿA pleasure working together? The effects of dissimilarity in team member conscientiousness on team temporal processes and individual satisfaction-. Journal of Organizational Behavior, DOI: 10.1002/job.544
[21] Sonnentag, S. and J. Volmer, 2009. ÔÇÿIndividual-level predictors of taskrelated teamwork processes: The role of expertise and self-efficacy in team meatings-. Group & Organization Management 34/1: 37-66.
[22] Z├írraga, C. and J. Bonache, 2005. ÔÇÿThe impact of team atmosphere on knowledge outcomes in self-managed teams-. Organization Studies 26/5: 661-681.
[23] Katzenbach, J. R., and D. K. Smith, 1993. The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
[24] Child, J. T., and M. Shumate, 2007. ÔÇÿThe impact of communal knowledge repositories and people-based knowledge management on perceptions of team effectiveness-. Communication Quarterly 21/1: 29- 54.
[25] Kuhn, T., and M. S. Poole, 2000. ÔÇÿDo conflict management styles affect group decision making?-. Human Communication Research 26/4: 558- 591.
[26] Coopman, S., 2001. ÔÇÿDemocracy, performance, and outcomes in interdisciplinary health care teams-. Journal of Business Communication 38/3: 261-284.
[27] Hirokawa, R. Y., and K. M. Rost, 1992. ÔÇÿEffective group decision making in organizations: Field test of the vigilant interaction theory-. Management Communication Quarterly 5/3: 267-288.
[28] Shah, P. P., K. T. Dirks, and N. Chervany, 2006. ÔÇÿThe multiple pathways of high performing groups: The interaction of social networks and group processes-. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27/3: 299-317.
[29] Styhre, A., J. Roth, and A. Ingelg├Ñrd, 2002. ÔÇÿCare of the other: Knowledge-creation through care in professional teams-. Scandinavian Journal of Management 18/4: 503-520.
[30] Hirschfeld, R. R., M. H. Jordan, H. S. Feild, W. F. Giles, and A. A. Armenakis, 2006. ÔÇÿBecoming team players: Team members- mastery of teamwork knowledge as a predictor of team task proficiency and observed teamwork effectiveness-. Journal of Applied Psychology 91/2: 467-474.
[31] Hawkins, K. W., and B. P. Fillion, 1999. ÔÇÿPerceived communication skill needs for work groups-. Communication Research Reports 16/2: 167- 174.
[32] Hollingshead, A. B., G. M. Wittenbaum, P. B. Paulus, R. Y. Hirokawa, D. G. Ancona, R. S. Peterson, K. A. Jehn, and K. Yoon, 2005. ÔÇÿA look at groups from the functional perspective- in Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives. M. S. Poole and A. B. Hollingshead (eds.), 21-62. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[33] Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln, 2005. ÔÇÿIntroduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research- in The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), 1-32. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[34] Hackman, J. R., and R. Wageman, 2005. ÔÇÿA theory of team coaching-. Academy of Management Review 30/2: 269-287.
[35] Lester, S. W., B. M. Meglino, and M. A. Korsgaard, 2002. ÔÇÿThe antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups-. Academy of Management Journal 45/2: 352-368.
[36] Gipson, C. B., C. D. Cooper, and J. A. Conger, 2009. ÔÇÿDo you see what we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams-. Journal of Applied Psychology 94/1: 62-76.
[37] Heider, F., 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
[38] Kelley, H. H.,1972. ÔÇÿAttribution in social interaction- in Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins and B. Weiner (eds), 1-26. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
[39] Weary, G., M. A. Stanley, and J. H. Harvey, 1989. Attribution. New York: Springer Verlag.
[40] Wallace, D. M., and V. B. Hinsz, 2009. ÔÇÿGroup members as actors and observers in attributions of responsibility for group performance-. Small Group Research 40/1: 52-71.
[41] Hirokawa, R. Y., and J. Keyton, 1995. ÔÇÿPerceived facilitators and inhibitors of effectiveness in organizational work teams-. Management Communication Quarterly 8/4: 424-446.
[42] Hirokawa, R. Y., D. DeGooyer, and K. Valde, 2000. ÔÇÿUsing narratives to study task group effectiveness-. Small Group Research 31/5: 573-591.
[43] Clandinin, D. J., and F M. Connelly, 2000. Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[44] Jensen, K. B., 2002. A handbook of media and communication research: Qualitative and quantitative methodologies. London: Routledge.
[45] Frey, L. R., C. H. Botan, and G. L. Kreps, 2000. Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods, 2nd edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[46] Lindlof, T. R., and B. C. Taylor, 2002. Qualitative communication research methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[47] Sillars, A., 1980. ÔÇÿAttributions and communication in roommate conflicts-. Communication Monographs 47/3: 180-200.
[48] Poole, M. S., J. Keyton, and L. R. Frey, 1999. ÔÇÿGroup communication methodology: Issues and considerations- in The handbook of group communication theory & research. L. R. Frey, D. Gouran and M. S. Poole (eds), 92-111. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[49] Bierhoff, H.-W., 1989. Person perception and attribution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
[50] Fiske, S. T., and S. E. Taylor, 1984. Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[51] Roloff, M. E., and C. R. Berger, editors, 1982. Social cognition and communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[52] Hildreth, P., and C. Kimble, editors, 2004. Knowledge networks. Innovation through communities of practice. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.