A Methodology for Quality Problems Diagnosis in SMEs
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
A Methodology for Quality Problems Diagnosis in SMEs

Authors: Humberto N. Teixeira, Isabel S. Lopes, Sérgio D. Sousa

Abstract:

This article proposes a new methodology to be used by SMEs (Small and Medium enterprises) to characterize their performance in quality, highlighting weaknesses and area for improvement. The methodology aims to identify the principal causes of quality problems and help to prioritize improvement initiatives. This is a self-assessment methodology that intends to be easy to implement by companies with low maturity level in quality. The methodology is organized in six different steps which includes gathering information about predetermined processes and subprocesses of quality management, defined based on the well-known Juran-s trilogy for quality management (Quality planning, quality control and quality improvement) and, predetermined results categories, defined based on quality concept. A set of tools for data collecting and analysis, such as interviews, flowcharts, process analysis diagrams and Failure Mode and effects Analysis (FMEA) are used. The article also presents the conclusions obtained in the application of the methodology in two cases studies.

Keywords: Continuous improvement, Diagnosis, Quality Management, Self-assessment, SMEs

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1069997

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2508

References:


[1] P. Crosby, Quality is free: the art of making quality certain. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
[2] J. C Bou-Llusar, A. B. Escrig-Tena, V. Roca-Ping, and I. Beltrán-Martín, "An empirical assessment of the EFQM Excellence Model: evaluation as a TQM framework relative to the MBNQA Model," Journal of Operations Management, vol. 27, pp. 1-22, 2009.
[3] T. Conti, "A history and review of the European Quality Award Model." The TQM Magazine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 112-128, 2007.
[4] T. Conti, "Optimizing self-assessment," Total Quality Management, vol. 8, no. 2-3, pp. 5-15, 1997.
[5] F. B. Benavent, S. C. Ros, and M. Moreno-Luzon., "A model of quality management self-assessment: an exploratory research," International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 432-451, 2005.
[6] S. D. Sousa, E. Aspinwall, P. Sampaio, and A. Rodrigues, "Performance measures and Quality Tools in Portuguese small and medium enterprises: survey results." Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 277-307, 2005.
[7] S. Biazzo and G. Bernardi, "Organizational self-assessment options: a classification and a conceptual map for SMEs," International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 881-900, 2003.
[8] J. Sturkenboom, T. Van Der Wiele, et al., "An action-oriented approach to quality management self-assessment in small and medium-sized enterprises," Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 231-246, 2001.
[9] A. Van der Wiele and A. R. T. Williams, "ISO 9000 series registration to business excellence: the migratory path," Business Process Management, vol. 6, no.5, 2000.
[10] S. Bisgaard, "Quality management and Juran-s legacy," Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 23, pp. 665-677, 2007
[11] A. B. Godfrey and R. S. Kenett, "Joseph M. Juran, a perspective on past contributions and future impact," Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 23, pp. 653-663, 2007.