Research on Platform of Testing Reference Point Effect under Managerial Decision-making Simulation Environment
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32826
Research on Platform of Testing Reference Point Effect under Managerial Decision-making Simulation Environment

Authors: Yang Jiang, Zhuchao Yu, Zhu Wang, Xueying Hong

Abstract:

Reference point effects of top managers exerts an influence on managerial decision-making behaviors. We introduces the main idea of developing the decision behavior testing system designed for top manager in team task circumstance. According to the theory of the reference point effect, study of testing experiments in the reference point effect is carried out. Under managerial decision-making simulation environment, a platform is designed for testing reference point effect. The system uses the outcome of the value of the reference point to report the characteristics of the decision behavior of top managers.

Keywords: reference point effect, decision-making behavior, top manager, managerial decision-making simulation environment.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1334584

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1033

References:


[1] XU Jiang, LIU Li, LIU Ruihua. Framing Effect in Behavioral Decision Making (J). Huazhong Normal University Journal of Postgraduates, 2010 (02).
[2] Tversky A, Kahneman, D. Rational choice and the framing of decision (J). Journal of Business, 1986, (59): 251-278.
[3] Song Hui. Analysis of Expected Utility Theory and Prospect Theory (J). Journal of Xi-an University of Finance and Economics, 2008, (02).
[4] Zhu Jinhong. The Theory Development of Behavior Decision Making under Uncertainty (J). Journal of Kaili University, 2009(04) .
[5] Chen Wenfu, Li Huaizu. Reference Point Methods of Intuitive Decision Making (J). SYSTEMS ENGINEERING-THEORY & PRACTICE, 1999, 19(1): 51-55.
[6] Liang Zhe, Li Shu, Xu Jiehong. THE DEDUCTION OF A DECISION WEIGHT ¤Ç: CONTROVERSIES, QUESTIONS, AND ANSWERS (J). Mathematics in Economics, 2007, (04).
[7] Li Zhanlei, Li Hongmei, Li Nan. The experiment of irrational behavior in individual decision-making (J). Journal of Hebei University of Engineering (Social Science Edition), 2007, (02).
[8] Wang Qiwen. Economic management computer basic course (M). Beijing: High Education Press, 1999.245-246.
[9] Xiao Xiaodong. Modern management model development and application (J). Modernization of Management, 2001(5): 50-52.
[10] Chiaki Iwai. DEVELOPMENT OF MBABEST21´╝îA CASE-BASED MANAGEMENT GAME (J).
[11] Wang Ping; Behavior under uncertainty decision Interpretation -- on prospect theory model research and development (J); Management Observer; 2008(7).
[12] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47: 263~297.
[13] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty (J). Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992(5): 297- 324.
[14] Shafire. Decision Making (M) WILSONRA, KEILFC. The M I T Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences .Massachusetts: The M I T Press, 2001: 220-223.
[15] Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982, 3: 323~ 343.
[16] Machina MJ. Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica, 1982, 50: 277~ 323.
[17] Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 1981, 211: 453~ 458.
[18] Mitsuru Morita, Masahiro Horiuchi, Chiaki Iwai, Masatsugu Oshima, Zhuchao Yu. An Experiment on Group Decision-Making Using A Business Game: An International Comparison of MBA Students In Japan, China, And Russia (C), The Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning (ABSEL2010), Vol. 32: 141-150, USA, Little Rock, 24-26 March 2010.
[19] Glimcher P W, Dorris M C, Bayer H M. Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice. Games and Economic Behavior, 2005, 52: 213~ 256.