Technology Based Learning Environment and Student Achievement in English as a Foreign Language in Pakistan
The fast growing accessibility and capability of emerging technologies have fashioned enormous possibilities of designing, developing and implementing innovative teaching methods in the classroom. The global technological scenario has paved the way to new pedagogies in teaching-learning process focusing on technology based learning environment and its impact on student achievement. The present experimental study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of technology based learning environment on student achievement in English as a foreign language. The sample of the study was 90 students of 10th grade of a public school located in Islamabad. A pretest- posttest equivalent group design was used to compare the achievement of the two groups. A Pretest and A posttest containing 50 items each from English textbook were developed and administered. The collected data were statistically analyzed. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of Experimental group and the Control group. The performance of Experimental group was better on posttest scores that indicted that teaching through technology based learning environment enhanced the achievement level of the students. On the basis of the results, it was recommended that teaching and learning through information and communication technologies may be adopted to enhance the language learning capability of the students.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1334367Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2631
 Salmon, G. (2005). Flying not flapping: A strategic framework for elearning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 13, 201-218.
 Harmon, S. W., & Jones, M. C. (1999). The five levels of Web use in education: Factors to consider in planning online courses. Educational Technology, 39(6), 28-31.
 Holt, D. M., & Thompson, D. J. (1998). Managing information technology in open and distance education. Distance Education, 19(2), 197-216.
 Jackson, B., & Anagnostopoulou, K. (2001). Making the right connections: Improving quality in online learning. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching and learning online: New pedagogies for new technologies
 Simonsen, M. (1995). Does anyone really want to learn at a distance? Techtrends, 40(5), 12. Learning Environ Res (2007) 10:189-206 205
 Reeves, T. C. (1994). Evaluating what really matters in computer-based education. In M. Wild & D. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), Computer education: New perspectives (pp. 219-246). Perth, Australia: MASTEC.
 Bennet, S., Priest, A., & Macpherson, C. (1999). Learning about online learning: An approach to staff development for university teachers. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15,207-221.
 Neo, K. T. K., & Neo, M. (2001). A constructivist learning experience: Reconstructing a web site using web based multimedia authoring tools. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3), 330-350.
 Torrisi-Steele, G. (2002). Technology for the sake of learningÔÇöA planning approach for integrating new technologies in tertiary learning environments. The Eighth Australian World Wide Web Conference, 6- 10 July, Twin Waters Resort, Sunshine Coast, Australia (pp. 349-362). Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University. Retrieved January 23, 2008,fromhttp://www.ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw02/papers/refereed/torrisi/in dex.html.123
 Mc Mahon, M. (1997, December). Social constructivism and the World Wide Web-A paradigm for learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), Perth, Australia. Retrieved January 23, 2006, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth97/papers/Mcmah on/Mcmahon.html.
 Pear, J. J., & Crone-Todd, D. E. (2002). A social constructivist approach to computer-mediated instruction. Computers and Education, 38, 221- 231.
 Ring, G., & McMahon, M. (1997, December). Web instruction: Searching for a theoretical basis. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE97), Kuching, Malaysia.
 Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249-294.
 Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. (1998). Classroom learning environments in urban elementary, middle and high schools. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 95-113. doi:10.1023/A:1009940816549.44 Learning Environ Res (2009) 12:31-44
 Langford, P. (1989). The process of learning. In P. Langford (Ed.), Educational psychology: An Australian perspective (pp. 43-64). Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.
 Cooke, S. (2005, September). Theme speakerÔÇöImplementation. Paper presented at the Association of Learning Technology Conference, Manchester, UK.
 Tucker, B., Jones, S., Straker, L., & Cole, J. (2003). Course evaluation on the web: Facilitating student and teacher reflection to improve learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 96, 81-93.
 Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2003). Exploring technology-mediated learning from a pedagogical perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 11, 111-126.
 Pelgrum, WJ & N Law (2003). "ICT in Education around the World: Trends, Problems and Prospects." International Institute of Educational Planning, UNESCO. Paris. P. 17-122.
 Zandvliet, B.D., & Fraser, .B.J (2005). Physical and Psychosocial environments associated with networked classroom. Learning Environments Research, 8, 1-17.
 Schelfhout, W., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2004). The use of self, peer and teacher assessment as a feedback system in a learning environment aimed at fostering skills of cooperation in an entrepreneurial context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 177-201.
 Krashen, S. D., & Terrel, D. T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
 Claire, E., & Haynes, J. (1994). Classroom teacher-s ESL Survival Kit 1. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.