Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30753
An Adequate Choice of Initial Sample Size for Selection Approach

Authors: Mohammad H. Almomani, Rosmanjawati Abdul Rahman

Abstract:

In this paper, we consider the effect of the initial sample size on the performance of a sequential approach that used in selecting a good enough simulated system, when the number of alternatives is very large. We implement a sequential approach on M=M=1 queuing system under some parameter settings, with a different choice of the initial sample sizes to explore the impacts on the performance of this approach. The results show that the choice of the initial sample size does affect the performance of our selection approach.

Keywords: ordinal optimization, Ranking and Selection, Optimal Computing Budget Allocation, Subset Selection, Indifference-Zone, Initial Sample Size

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1329042

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 933

References:


[1] S.H. Kim and B.L. Nelson, "Selecting the best system," Operations Research and Management Science, Chapter 17, pp. 501-534, 2006.
[2] Y.C. Ho, R.S. Sreenivas and P. Vakili, "Ordinal optimization of DEDS," Journal of Discrete Event Dynamic System, vol. 2, pp. 61-88, 1992.
[3] C.H. Chen, E. Y¨ucesan and S.E. Chick, "Simulation budget allocation for further enhancing the efficiency of ordinal optimization," Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 251-270, 2000.
[4] C.H. Chen, C.D. Wu and L. Dai, "Ordinal comparison of heuristic algorithms using stochastic optimization," IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 44-56, 1999.
[5] M.H. Almomani and R. Abdul Rahman, "Selecting a good stochastic system for the large number of alternatives," Accepted and will be published in Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 2011.
[6] C.H. Chen, "An effective approach to smartly allocated computing budget for discrete event simulation," IEEE Conference on Decision and control, vol. 34, pp. 2598-2605, 1995.
[7] S.S. Gupta, "On some multiple decision (selection and ranking) rules," Technometrics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 225-245, 1965.
[8] D.W. Sullivan and J.R. Wilson, "Restricted subset selection procedures for simulation," Operations Research, vol. 37, pp. 52-71, 1989.
[9] Y. Rinott, "On two-stage selection procedures and related probabilityinequalities," Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, vol. A7, pp. 799-811, 1978.
[10] A.C. Tamhane and R.E. Bechhofer, "A two-stage minimax procedure with screening for selecting the largest normal mean," Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, vol. A6, pp. 1003-1033, 1977.
[11] B.L. Nelson, J. Swann, D. Goldsman and W. Song, "Simple procedures for selecting the best simulated system when the number of alternatives is large," Operations Research, vol. 49, pp. 950-963, 2001.
[12] M.H. Alrefaei and M.H. Almomani, "Subset selection of best simulated systems," Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 344, no. 5, pp. 495-506, 2007.
[13] R.E. Bechhofer, T.J. Santner and D.M. Goldsman, Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening, and Multiple Comparisons. New York:Wiley, 1995.
[14] D. Goldsman and B.L. Nelson, "Ranking, selection and multiple comparisons in computer simulation," Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 192-199.
[15] S.H. Kim and B.L. Nelson, "Recent advances in ranking and selection," Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 162-172.
[16] R.R. Wilcox, "A table for Rinott-s selection procedure," Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 16, pp. 97-100, 1984.
[17] D. He, S.E. Chick and C.H. Chen, "Opportunity cost and OCBA selection procedures in ordinal optimization for a fixed number of alternative systems," IEEE Transactions on Systems, vol. 37, pp. 951-961, 2007.
[18] S.E. Chick and Y. Wu, "Selection procedures with frequentist expected opportunity cost bounds," Operations Research, vol. 53 no. 5,pp. 867- 878, 2005.